well i can promise you that if Rosier comes out of spring as starter, and i agree that until someone beats him out he should start, he will not have the success he had last year, blueprint is out there now. Should he start v LSU and play the whole game i would surprised to win it, that's thinking they have the athletes they normally do which would allow them to shut down the run. Normally LSU has very good db's, can Rosier beat them with his arm, we cannot go 3 and out and put pressure on our D, we're not that good. Their gonna frustrate the **** out of 12 and let him self destruct, we didnt see a team with LSU athletes till Clemson last year, kinda glad we will see that right off the bat this year, get this QB thing out of the way so we can move forward. At some point in this game Perry will have to come in, 12 will lose confidence, and he will be able to move the offense. You just cant duplicate this at practice i dont care what anybody says, Richt can say what he wants but this game itself will determine our quarterback going forward, and we're damm lucky LSU is not up to snuff, which allows us the chance to work things out and still win the game
forums
malik rosier will be starting next year all year long
- Thread starter jackedaround
- Start date
Advertisement
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2017
- Messages
- 918
datdude81
Junior
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 2,016
Perry stayed himself after the bowl game this team needs a real leader
There is no way in heck Rosier starts
He doesn’t communicate with the WRs like a qb should which may be even more of a reason why he is so off on his deep balls
He is grossly inaccurate and when it’s high competition opposing defenders are in his head
The only thing he can do decently is scramble but he can create plays or look off safeties etc he is just not that great we saw the best of him last year and that was a miracle
There is no way in heck Rosier starts
He doesn’t communicate with the WRs like a qb should which may be even more of a reason why he is so off on his deep balls
He is grossly inaccurate and when it’s high competition opposing defenders are in his head
The only thing he can do decently is scramble but he can create plays or look off safeties etc he is just not that great we saw the best of him last year and that was a miracle
That is a good argument, we should've won by more and won more. Especially this year given the talent we have on offense, I hope that one of the other QB's can maximize it. I have no confidence that Rosier will.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2017
- Messages
- 918
I find it to be a terrible argument considering we won more games last year than the previous 13 years.
Number1CanesFan
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Messages
- 13,632
How do you know Rosier will be the starter all year? I hate that the sports world treats QBs like starting pitchers. Makes me wanna puke! Rosier even referred to himself as a 10 game winner. Bull****!!!
Sure Rosier made some plays down the stretch of games to help us win (FSU, GT). But let's shed some light on those 10 wins.
First of all, the defense averaged nearly 4 turnovers per game, but the offense scored less than 10 points per game off of turnovers. If We reduced the defensive turnovers to 2 per game, the offense probably doesn't score any points off of turnovers. Given the numerous close games, Miami would have lost to Georgia Tech, North Carolina, Virginia, and the Virginia Tech game would have been a toss up. Even with a VT win, it would have been a 6-4 regular season.
Would you be saying Rosier is definitely our starter with a 6-4 regular season and possibly 6-5 record With no Coastal Division title? I don't think so. That's what Rosier performed at. He was inconsistent, but serviceable.
Don't get it twisted. The TEAM won 10 games because of the defense and their ability to get turnovers.
The starting QB position is there for the taking. We'll see if any of the young bucks can dethrone Rosier.
I guarantee you this, Rosier will not have the luxury of overcoming poor 1st half performances. If he's having a bad half, he will sit while someone else gets a chance.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2012
- Messages
- 6,870
The fact he's starting kinda means we have nobody else.
Dwinstitles
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2011
- Messages
- 54,611
If he stars it will be like all other coaches, scared to bench the starter. **** it took Saban a whole year to start the better guy, I just dont get why coaches do this. Start the better player especially when its obvious that the bench player is better by a mile
Advertisement
kryptonite
AARP
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2012
- Messages
- 14,162
He's pretty good at winning 10 games too.
kryptonite
AARP
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2012
- Messages
- 14,162
Or maybe, like last season, it will be because nobody took the job from him. I'm just saying, it doesn't have to be about being scared, it could be about how the other QBs perform in practice.
Dwinstitles
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2011
- Messages
- 54,611
I think its more of how the coach would look to the team to bench a guy that brought them to rank number 2 in the country, I mean thats got ot be it.
datdude81
Junior
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 2,016
That defense won him most of them games sir
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2017
- Messages
- 918
Everyone's aware that our defense was statistically better in total and scoring defense in 2016 than it was in 2017, right? Everyone's aware that the defense gave up 38 points to Clemson and 34 points to Wisconsin, right?
gruntking
Make Lies Wrong Again
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2015
- Messages
- 7,669
The defense lost any hope after seeing the offense... 3 and out, 3 and out, 3 and out, three and out.............
kryptonite
AARP
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2012
- Messages
- 14,162
He played well enough to win, and that shouldn't be discounted. When we needed it, when the D had given up late points to fsu, the guy came through. When the D was making opposing QBs look like Heisman candidates, he did enough to win. It was rarely pretty, but give the man his due.
Advertisement
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2017
- Messages
- 918
Are you under the impression that the 2016 offense was not 99th in the country in 3rd down conversion rate?
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2017
- Messages
- 918
Exactly, the only difference is the QB. In years past, it was the defense that lost the games. Now that Rosier had game-winning drives it's not the defense's fault at all. Now it's Rosier's fault that we didn't win by enough points. Fuggin retards.
gruntking
Make Lies Wrong Again
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2015
- Messages
- 7,669
I'm not sure what your point is here after reading your previous posts. Without using stats, I'm going by what I witnessed all year regarding 3rd down conversions. Here on CIS people have blamed Rosier, the play calling, injuries, and even officiating bias...etc.
We had a good 2017, but this is the U and we all expect more. We beat who we were supposed to beat and with the exception of ND, FSU and VT everybody else we beat had a losing record... including GT who we miraculously beat.
Even though the defense had bad games especially the last ones... I still believe that the offense needs more work to get our program back and be able to beat elite programs. And I think we can start by getting a more effective QB.
Don't get me wrong we need to better the defense and cultivate recruits.
Hey It's 2:30am... goodnight
Number1CanesFan
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Messages
- 13,632
I would say we HAD no one else. Sheriffs wasn't the answer. Our two freshman (Perry and Weldon) weren't ready. Both are in year 2 and Jerrod Williams is an early enrollee. So there are 3 potential starters over Rosier. Realistically, I would say there are 2 (Perry and Weldon).
It's not fair to pass judgment on guys who haven't played yet. We don't know how much they have improved and matured.
How much will Rosier improve. We will find out all we need to know during the Spring and Fall camps.
Even if Rosier looks great in practice, I don't trust that it will transfer it to the games. He has to prove he can play at a high level on a consistent basis. That means > 62% completions rate and < 25% int/td. Last year he had 54% completions rate and 54% interception to touchdown rate (26 TDs, 14 INTs). He needed to be at 62% completion, 26 TDs and 7 INTs.
We'll see if he improves.
Personally, I'm pulling for Perry because he has the biggest ceiling and the most talent of any qb or other player on the roster. If he reaches his potential, we can challenge Clemson for the ACC title and a playoff birth.