- Joined
- Feb 3, 2018
- Messages
- 25,428
IDK, I saw some nice plays in that brief clip.... from everyone
Highlights are amazing!IDK, I saw some nice plays in that brief clip.... from everyone
Now I can’t tell if they were all good or if they all sucked
Nothing I wrote is “assuming” anythingAre we assuming the OL played worse when Tate was QB? Bc the other guys didn’t take six sacks
It honestly crossed my mind that all this is some Jedi mind trick from Manny. We have 3 highly talented QBs and an elite QB coach. Every "report" is xyz was the best but xyz struggled. He wants the turds to think they got it in the bag.
Tate is plenty talented making plays on the run. We also don't have Louisville's OL.He didn't mask shît because that o-line was still terrible. He just was that special of a athlete that he was able to make plays. We dont have a lamar jackson.
I think it's been said he was "protecting" him.... maybe from the weak OL line... he had him practice all pre-Pinstripe bowl to be the #2 guy. Had him warm up and then left him standing on the sidelines
Yep but that **** ain’t gonna workI can't help but read a piece like this and think that its all an elaborate PR strategy to prevent 2 of the 3 from transferring.
Dude you obsessed with tate.Tate is plenty talented making plays on the run. We also don't have Louisville's OL.
You used too much logic and level headedness here. Get the pitchforks readyFellas, y’all gotta look big picture here. Miami isn’t winning the NC, and unless they pull off one of the biggest upsets in recent memory, they’re not beating Clemson and making the playoffs (Clemson would be a 21+ point favorite at this point over Miami on a neutral field).
So what are we really looking for here?
We all have concerns about the OL & QB, whoever that may be. And they’re justified. This is simply not going to be a championship line, and we’re not getting championship play from the QB. But that’s fine. We’ve all said for 8 months, if the offense was just decent in 2018, we’re 11-1 most likely. So really, even with these concerns we all have, can this be a good enough offense to beat everyone on our schedule not named Clemson? I think it can. And it doesn’t have to be a world-beater, it just needs to be a step up from last year, which considering the coordinator and Rosier being ejected from the program, I don’t think that’s far-fetched. So, I understand the standard here will always be the same, but as fans let’s be realistic. Can these pieces produce an average to good offense? That should be the focus. They’re leading TD drives against what should be a ferocious defense in Scrimmage #1. That might be a positive.
Progress on that side, continued success from the defense, beat UF & FSU, win the coastal, and keep stacking chips on the trail.
My thoughts here are that the odds of having 3 really good QBs are pretty slim. Assuming they all suck because they’re competing closely is ridiculous, but I’d really love to hear that one kid was pulling away with the job simply because if not, the odds of having 3 equally good quarterbacks aren’t nearly as high as having 3 equally average ones. But assuming NONE of them can play because they haven’t separated is retarded.
"One observer thought Williams was narrowly the best Sunday but that it wasn’t clear cut and nobody has taken command of this QB battle. Besides the pick to Hall, Williams threw a couple of other passes that were near interceptions."
That is a directly contradictory statement lol
He was the best on Sunday, but it wasn't clear that he's the best & nobody has shown that they're the best & aside from 1INT threw some bad passes that should've been INT's which clearly shows he wasn't the best... But he was the best.
Lmao! That's what we've gotten all Fall camp from all the writers covering this camp, including on here.
Every description of all 3 QB's has been how they've been the best while simultaneously not being the best lol
You're a clown and the biggest hater on this site. Your bias doesn't allow you to be objective and realize facts. You want to criticize his height or arm, fine but he has an elite short shuttle for a reason.Dude you obsessed with tate.
Short shuttle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You're a clown and the biggest hater on this site. Your bias doesn't allow you to be objective and realize facts. You want to criticize his height or arm, fine but he has an elite short shuttle for a reason.
All of'em.Good for Harley. Which three wide receivers emerge from Payton, Pope, Wiggins, Hightower, and Harley?
Man that’s going to be a tough decision, we have a really talented receiver groupGood for Harley. Which three wide receivers emerge from Payton, Pope, Wiggins, Hightower, and Harley?
Good for Harley. Which three wide receivers emerge from Payton, Pope, Wiggins, Hightower, and Harley?