Won't be a problem if we kick their a$$ every year.I don't like giving UL more access to SF exposure...Vice versa, the Virginia area is good recruiting grounds while Kentucky doesn't provide much for us. Don't mind BC, but on and off the field, would much rather have VT than UL.
As long as they keep FSU on our schedule, I don’t really care about the other matchups. It would be nice to have VT on there, but I won’t be losing sleep over it.This whole format is predicated on what UNC and Duke wanted. So it’s no surprise they got their 3 historical rivals. The rest of the conference matchups and future schedules have to be built around it. That’s why we’re playing BC and Louisville. That’s why Wake is playing GT and VT. None of the other schools matchups make a lot sense.
Murderers row.Looks like at Clemson, at Notre Dame, and at Florida in 2024.
Only if he decides to retire. They're going to win 9+ games this year but I can definitely see this being the beginning of his downfall.Dabo will be gone by 24…book it
UNC got the easiest primary opponents IMO
Not playing the Hokies every year is going to be really strange
As long as they keep FSU on our schedule, I don’t really care about the other matchups. It would be nice to have VT on there, but I won’t be losing sleep over it.
We'll have a two year gap before we play them again. Not until 2025.I feel like people are not processing that we will still play VT, and everyone else every other year. That’s still a lot. The rivalries will all stay intact.
We'll have a two year gap before we play them again. Not until 2025.
Sure, we'll play them more often than if they were in a separate division like BC was, but the rivalry should have been respected.Short term problem. One extra year, once. Whatever. Will be some breakage as we get this going, once it’s rolling it’s rolling.
except for having to play Clemson 3 straight years, including twice on the road...