ShadowSpring
Junior
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2017
- Messages
- 5,429
Props to @Coach Macho for calling it after seeing a few practices. Homey said that Harris was better and Lingard was struggling.
People are conveniently choosing to ignore the fact that Macho and others called this a long time ago after actually watching practices.Props to @Coach Macho for calling it after seeing a few practices. Homey said that Harris was better and Lingard was struggling.
Good players dont need coaches to beat FIU. The quicker yall see that the better you will be. Bama can roll out there with no gameplan and theyll beat FIU.We go 6-7 because we have trash coaches. Soft players play a role in this too unfortunately. Especially when you lose to significantly less talented teams.
If he’s not all the way back healthy, what the **** type of injury did he have? We need to look in the health doctors conducting the surgery too tbh. Oh well
He played like 3-4 plays the entire seasonWhat dont understand about the "not all the way back healthy" narrative is....he covered kicks.
If he can run and take contact and cut to cover kicks...how is he not healthy enough to run the ball?
Covering kicks is just as stressful.
Who says it's about the stress and chance of reinjury? Maybe he was CAPABLE of covering kicks but didn't demonstrate the vision and cutback ability needed to be an effective running back? Many people cover kicks that don't do much else.What dont understand about the "not all the way back healthy" narrative is....he covered kicks.
If he can run and take contact and cut to cover kicks...how is he not healthy enough to run the ball?
Covering kicks is just as stressful.
Gus edwards, not good enough for Miami to play regularly, says hi from Baltimores buy weekProps to @Coach Macho for calling it after seeing a few practices. Homey said that Harris was better and Lingard was struggling.
you're like 0 for 1,000 on all your hot takes & predictions this 2019 season, so I guess why start making any sense now?I’m one of those who think Manny is the issue. But I can’t argue with him on Lingard. Richt didn’t play Lingard, either.
He had on-field limitations and then he got hurt. In the right system he can be dangerous because of his elite speed. I hope he puts it together.
you're like 0 for 1,000 on all your hot takes & predictions this 2019 season, so I guess why start making any sense now?
Richt did begin to play Lingard and we had 2 NFL running backs ahead of him on the team last year. The fact that you think he has more "limitations" than Robert Burns or a kid who couldn't beat out Nay'quan Wright as a senior in HS for carries is literal insanity.
So the guy who probably had more success with stud freshmen running backs than anyone goes to UM and suddenly decides that it is a good idea to keep a 5 star stud on the bench? That makes zero sense. Richt didn't play him because he didn't show that he was good enough.I’m talking about here. I know what he did at UGA.
Agree and I've noticed Dr. Kaplan on the sidelines this year, I don't recall seeing him. Seems like the staff and/or administration are not confident in Vinny with injuries.
That’s an unfair comment, imo. Lingard had a good attitude by all accounts I have seen. I could believe his blocking was a concern of the staff, especially with our OL. And the injury didn’t help. But tarring him with suggestions of culture strikes me as really unfair to a good kid who has repped the U well.