- Joined
- Feb 2, 2014
- Messages
- 2,974
How do you think they became a national brand?
Man, if only they decided to recruit better players on defense...
How dense can you be? Oregon chooses not to focus on defense. I really didn't think anyone still questioned this.
2014 - blown out, no defense
2013 - eliminated when the offense didn't show up, defense allowed 42 points
2012 - lost as the #1 team in the country when Stanford, who plays defense, stuck it up their ***; offense score 14 pts
2011 - outscored twice, giving up 38 and 40 points
What was your argument again?
Seriously dude your an idiot!
Your now saying they choose not to recruit top players in defense but only 3 stars. That's the lamest argument I have ever heard in my life.
I can see it now... Chip: "Why do you have the 5 star DE on the board? He will take to much effort and we are not a school that plays defense, put that 3 star back up there and take all those 4 and 5 stars down."
And you really have the nerve to call someone else dense when you know that your making stuff up just to float this nonsensical argument. You understand that this isnt Hockey right? They actually have two sides of the ball and their recruiting rankings are based on both sides of the ball.
You actually stated that these schools could get who they want but they choose not to get bigger names.
You tell me how that's not the stupidest thing ever said on this board.
When you can show me a school that avg a top 5 class year in and year out and then show me how their defense fails because they run and up tempo offense we will listen but until then we all know your desperately making stuff up simply because your simple mind is so biased towards one coach that its not even allowing you to look at things objectively. It has total control, its lazy as **** and its embarrassing you. Just stop already, stop.