CaneInHeelCountry
Junior
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 1,870
Unless you guys can't point to some concrete negatives about UM getting an IPF, I'm not sure why you're wasting any time arguing about the degree to which that this is a positive development.
With a name like "Republicane", I'd think you'd be wary of throwing money at something that may not yield a tangible benefit. Seems like you'd want to know there'd be a pretty good ROI.
Why? It's not my money they'd be spending. At least there is a slight possibility that it could pay dividends for the football team. If they didn't spend it on building an IPF they'd likely just be spending it on some bull**** money sink research project. "We're really excited to find out about the *********ory habits of transsexual Dominican iguanas! This study should dovetail nicely with the work UM has already done on the rare Panamanian **** goat."
If you've bought tickets to games and UM paraphernalia, it is your money.
Why do you--and a few others here--seem to assume that if we didn't fund an IPF, the money would be lost by the athletic dept and shifted to academics? I'm pretty sure this isn't the case.
I've already outlined a few ways that that money could potentially be spend within the football program, ways that would likely provide a better ROI. Buy out Golden and improve coaching salaries for one. Improve the weight room to a level on par with Bama, Texas, and other top-tier programs is another. And finally, the admin could have chosen to take the ~20 mil it will end up spending on an IPF to begin an earnest effort to fundraise for a new stadium.
If the IPF is a done deal, so be it...whoo ******* hoo. But point is that it's 20 mil that could be better spent.