I love d$ but I hope he’s off the arch love fest after this…

[Shooter McGavin]

View attachment 375815

Go glaze Pringle and say he’s better than all our rbs you dikweed. You are seriously one of the worst posters here.

 

[ssvir]

The NFL values Arch way more than the fans.

Does that mean they are right? Of course not. That story is still being written, and they get things wrong like everyone else.

But you always talk about real football experience and seem to ignore that the “football people” are much more in line with my thinking on this.

Your fallback is always "NFL" like that is somehow a justification for your position that they don't stink in college.

Arch does less with more than possibly any player in the history of college football.

 

[ssvir]

View attachment 375783

 

[dade305cane]

Beck was a 72% passer last year. That was through 16 games. He was very consistent outside of Ville game. His problem was the deep ball with an elbow that was still healing. His consistency got him drafted in 3rd round. You can bet Texas would trade for Beck right now if they could. Conversely, Manning was a 61% passer last year and 63% this year. Comparing their accuracy is foolish.

Which is why I said he got better and improved. I'm going back to his UGA' days with inconsistency.

 

[CaneFan79]

I will relent some; Arch would be a better NFL QB than Malik Willis.

 

[ddann]

It still might work out for him to be a first rounder, in DMoney defense.

GM’s care whole lot more about the name and “how it looks” than actual performance.

Anything can happen, famous last name or not. Remember how high the Dolphins took Ryan Tannehill?

 

[Calinative]

Go glaze Pringle and say he’s better than all our rbs you dikweed. You are seriously one of the worst posters here.

ok lol

 

[DMoney]

Your fallback is always "NFL" like that is somehow a justification for your position that they don't stink in college.

I like NFL data because it is objective and removed from message board emotion.

It also removes the player from his college environment.

 

[Shooter McGavin]

ok lol

**** you

 

[Calinative]

**** you

 

[ddann]

I keep hearing the “GMs will value his last name” line.

When does that actually happen? The last time I heard this was with Eli Manning, who ended up winning two Super Bowls and throwing for a million yards.

If anything, these legacy first rounders actually overperform relative to the average first round pick (McAffrey, Watt, Matthews x2, Horn, Surtain).

I’ve got a better example for you based on Texas history in the Mack Brown era.

His name was Chris Simms.

 

[caneforlifeforreal]

I literally think Arch would be an Undrafted Free Agent if his last name wasn’t Manning. He’s a great athlete & runner but woof on his passing.

Maybe he should play WR like his Dad. He has more of those genes than his Uncles

 

[ddann]

If his last name was Jones nobody would be talking about him

Oh yeah?

What if he was the little brother of Daniel
Jones?

 

[Peachycarnahan]

Why can’t you say something to the effect of:

“Despite Arch failing to come near his lofty expectations out of high school, his lack of development by Texas, his poor mechanics and his continued mistakes when lights shine brightest, Arch will likely be taken in the first round by some team NFL team because of his traits (and pedigree).”

That statement is tough to argue with. The parenthetical is optional. I included it because I believe that to be the case. The rest is factual. Instead, you keep pumping sunshine on this guy. Hence the strong pushback.

I don't necessarily agree with all of your points but in total, it is a well written and fair take. golf clap.