Yeah - I remember very, very well -
We lost like 31 scholarships - no bowls - no one wanted to come here - and I recall Soldinger saying they didn't even have enough players to scrimmage.
Now how in H*** are you supposed to win ten games a year when you're in that deep of a hole? And yet, that's the only thing many can look at.
They weren't old enough to recall our hiring of Schnellenberger - or even JJ. They act like they know all the history - but it wasn't pretty back then.
Freaking kids - "what's the numbers?"
Hand Butch the team handed to JJ - what's it going to be?
Hand Butch the team Dennis was handed.
Some of you are just so simple - and you have no idea what his record would be. I recall JJ's first year - not so good. And yes, I recall his announcement, and thinking - "who is this guy?"
Well, I hope you are not calling me "simple" but I'll survive regardless if you are. : )
First of all in JJ's first year he had a staff who hated him and a few who thought they should be HC forced down his throat, didn't he? Let's provide context. It's also, you know, a first year. Especially when every other year proved that he was the goods. Upward trajectory. Sky high. He also built Miami's first GREAT teams. 1983 won it all in a kind of cardiac way (amazingly!!), depending on other losses, etc. Jimmy's teams were dominant. Was different, incredible, he proved UM was not a fluke.
Anyway, as an example, taking a team that should be 2-10 and going 6-6 with it does not get you into the HOF. I'm sorry, it just doesn't. It's a job well done, congrats, but winning, and winning big is it.
As for your premise, I'm not sure. Butch, and this is subjective, but I'm not sure how anyone lands elsewhere, was easily the worst game-day coach among Howard, Jimmy, Dennis and himself. In fact, many think he had the best team in CFB in 2000 and didn't get it done. Some believe he might have screwed up the 2001 team, that won it all but had a close call or two.
Butch's strength... ****, really the thing he was known for, was recruiting, and even more so IMO, evaluations. So I'm not sure what the result would have been if he had been handed a team with more talent. We might be talking about a guy we grew tired with for not getting enough out of what he was handed.
I've been a Cane fan my whole life, and I remember the fanbase, THIS fanbase, mostly from the internet of which I maybe assume you participated, calling him Freckles, Botch, and literally paying good money to fly a banner over the OB demanding that he be fired. So, let's not pretend the base wasn't absolutely fed up with some of his game day decisions, clock management, bad losses, and more.
To answer your question directly, I would easily say that had Butch been handed the teams that Jimmy or Dennis were handed, he would have performed worse, because he was simply a lesser coach on game day. History (and me!) says that he would have recruited better than Dennis and left the program in better shape, though.
Kudos to Butch. The right man at the right time who helped right the ship. Boooo to Butch for a lot of other questionable actions in his career and dealings with UM.
As for the HOF, absolutely not a slam dunk. It's a fair debate, as, IMO has been illustrated in this thread.
Lightning rod!