Nope.
View attachment 216994
10 of these 15 teams are ranked and have performed mostly in line with there recruiting classes. Almost all have played multiple games against teams on this very list, so it skews win-loss record and rankings.
We are the only team on this list with a losing record besides aTm. We both have awful, out of date offenses that suppress our talent and locker room issues.
Auburn plays a murderous schedule and just replaced their coach who was a bad fit. Oklahoma and Florida are both under 1st year coaches. They have issues but are not devoid of talent.
So why are we the only team on this list that “has no talent”? It’s bullshyt the fan base keeps spewing to vent their frustration and coddle terrible coaching.
Our team hasn’t played well. Doesn’t mean we “have no talent”. It just means we haven’t played well for MANY reasons. There are coaches and players who need to be replaced. We need to improve our size, athleticism, and depth. None of that is in question.
Look at our performance from Enos to Lashlee to Gattis. The talent level didn’t change much, but the production certainly did. Talent is not equal to production. I don’t know why this is so hard for people to see.