My take, we already know we have a finished product with Rosier, with Perry there is the hope/assumption that there is a higher ceiling and the expectation of him living up to a much higher recruiting ranking coming in. So the perception that he's a better player(eventually) and plus, we've all seen enough of Rosier.
There's an old saying in sports - if you're going to be bad or struggle, it's better to be young and go with upside
I think that's the case here
Now, to your point, yeah, both QB's have been bad. And this archaic system - which some believe is only the 1995 Dallas Cowboys offensive line away from being functional - doesn't help matters. Its why I call his offense 'the BetaMax', I think it's dated and much too reliant on 50-50 balls downfield. And yeah, the QB coaching leaves a TON to be desired(although they will be well conditioned with all the gassers they are made to do during practice)
Yeah, this side of the ball is broken.
But as it relates to Malik and Rosier it's like choosing between gonorrhea and syphilis.
Personally, I had had it with Rosier to a point that I wanted Perry( in part because next year we have a tough opener vs UF and I dont want a raw rookie taking snaps that game) no matter what. I saw no future or present with 12. Well, after the UVA meltdown and some of the stuff that Ive been told about Perry( and Chise I recall telling you about them a couple of years ago) and some of the social media postings, well, now I want Jarren Williams to start getting warmed up in the bullpen.
Our QB's are what they are, but I really think the bigger picture is the guy running it(something I said b4 the last loss).