- Joined
- Jan 5, 2019
- Messages
- 26
Think I only counted 1 run that went off tackleDo we have anymore running plays other than this
Think I only counted 1 run that went off tackleDo we have anymore running plays other than this
Kinda crazyThat would require some creativity, something Dawson lacks.
It kind of went away after the A&M game. I was baffled why they went so basic after that. Because they looked really good in that game.Kinda crazy
We watched it v A&M two years ago
Where has it gone?
Pre snap motion etc…
Hal Mumme the father of the air raid talks about the air raid running game here in this video. Just skip to 36:15 of this video
Calling them slow, brutal.Have you guys ever considered that the reason why the run calls aren't varied in the way that yall would like is because the personnel might not excel at executing it?
If you build a run game around being physically imposing & 2 of your top 3 RB's are big slow power backs, what gives you guys confidence that putting in all these outside runs will work for + positive yards?
The run game is tailored to the strengths of the personnel; the calls are that way because that's what they do best, run straight forward.
You're not a journeyman OC anymore once you've put together a #1 offense and a 1.1 QB.Journeyman OC and a caveman head coach will do that. The bootlickers on here will defend defend until we lose then say I didn’t see it coming after the second lost they pretend they knew it was bad idea all along.
Btw to the mouth breather that said bama did the samething, no they didnt: you can use YouTube
If you don't get caught, there was no holding.30 off one run where we were held on the edge.
How fast do you think Fletch & Chamar Brown are?
Faster than me!How fast do you think Fletch & Chamar Brown are?
We’re not burying our head in the sand. It’s literally been proven to work. Last season our running game was great. No it’s not the most creative or ****, but it’s efficient and methodical. Which is a tried and true formula.The run scheme is legitimately terrible. Half the people on here can bury their head in the sand, but it is an absolutely awful run scheme.
LETS DO TIGHT SPLITS NEXTHave you guys ever considered that the reason why the run calls aren't varied in the way that yall would like is because the personnel might not excel at executing it?
If you build a run game around being physically imposing & 2 of your top 3 RB's are big slow power backs, what gives you guys confidence that putting in all these outside runs will work for + positive yards?
The run game is tailored to the strengths of the personnel; the calls are that way because that's what they do best, run straight forward.
lol this is such bs. If we do lose a game it won’t be because our running game, I can guarantee you that. Not ONE game we lost last season was because “lack of creativity in our run game.” Its a top 10 rushing offense for goodness sakeJourneyman OC and a caveman head coach will do that. The bootlickers on here will defend defend until we lose then say I didn’t see it coming after the second lost they pretend they knew it was bad idea all along.
Btw to the mouth breather that said bama did the samething, no they didnt: you can use YouTube
Said exactly this in an earlier post…If we had any flavor in the run game we win by 21+ and they never stop us.
Hope it’s in our bag for later. (I know it’s not)
A jet sweep to Marion, Toney, or even Lofton would have broken for 50+ multiple times last night because they crashed and sold out right up the gut
Welp @DMoney I don’t know who the people are but I for one hear you but context matters too…How is it obvious? Do you have any evidence to back that up? I suspect you do not.
We were top 5 nationally in yards per carry last year while also avoiding negative plays and converting everything on the top offense in America. It’s the same scheme and our lead back didn’t even make an NFL team.
Notre Dame was also Top 5 last year, with a first round pick at RB. Most people considered them the best rushing team in America. We just outran them quite easily. People would’ve been doing cartwheels in June if I said that would happen. Now it’s happened, and people are proposing undefined “tweaks” to our run game that they can’t articulate with any meaning.
We have one of the best running games in America. We bully the bullies. Sit back and enjoy the show.
And it works just fine.You saw the graphic last night. 76% of our run plays last year were between the tackles 2nd in the nation (only to Army? I think?).
No reason to believe this year will be any different.
It didn't last night when we needed it on a couple of late drives. Regardless, it doesn't make much sense to think it won't improve with more unpredictability.And it works just fine.
Can you elaborate on what we do in the run game? I saw atleast 5 different schemes without rewatching the game yet. The "dive" comment is old and false.The run scheme is legitimately terrible. Half the people on here can bury their head in the sand, but it is an absolutely awful run scheme.
But they were more creative broMiami’s running backs- 131 yards
Notre Dame’s running backs- 78 yards