T
TreOFive
Guest
what a ******* moron...his eloquence is simply a mask of his stupidity.
So your defense relies on turnovers, Al. Good luck buddy.
I'm sick of all this we didn't get off the field on 3rd down, didn't get stops on first down. We ****ing know that, the question is why you fat ****ing piece of ****. Corbata de Mierda
If you want to cause turnovers, you should be hitting the QB and FB every dam play. Which we didn't.
Of course we did. It might have been seven yards downfield on 3rd and 1, but we hit them.
I forget whether it Lu or D who said this but when you're playing that far back from the line its like trying to tackle a piano moving downhill. They're caught in space hoping to wrap up. Instead of coming downhill at the ball carrier its the opposite.
I mentioned it after the Nebraska game. Because, in a kind of absurd way, EVERY SINGLE coaching camp, clinic or seminar that you go to has a defensive coach talking about stopping a good RB *before he gets started downhill.*
To add to that, I played Safety and tackling anyone who's already coming downhill at you is a losing proposition whether you're the biggest guy in the world, surest tackler or whatever. The ability to cutback into wide open space or just the sheer physics of tackling a guy coming at you full speed when you've likely taken your first two steps back in coverage (and have to guess where he's going) are just parts of what makes this a weird approach to consistently rely on.
Idk if this was posted yet.
Q: Your struggling puts a microscope on everything. People are posting pictures of the defense off TV. Like a third and two play in both games, Nebraska and Georgia Tech, they'll snap the screen and it'll show Denzel Perryman, for instance, seven yards off the ball on third and one or third and two and the play gets converted and that opens up a snowstorm of criticism. What would be the explanation for things like that which might be contributing to the struggles in getting off the field on third down?
Golden: Denzel's depth is a function of the defense. Depending what we're doing with the defensive tackles his first gap might have to get outside (and he needs room off the line to get there). He's never supposed to be seven yards, we want him at six. We tried to get him to move up during the game. … in terms of the Georgia Tech game, that was designed. He's designed to be there. The tackles and perhaps one of the outside linebackers who was blitzing is responsible for the dive. Many times he's responsible for the dive because many of the times we're asking him to scrape fast because the outside linebacker is coming. What I'm saying is we move them back in certain instances because we're bringing the outside linebacker and his [Perryman's] gap (would be) outside. I don't know which play you're talking about. The last three years we beat that team running the same stuff. We got takeaways, third down stops, got a fourth down stop. And the offense in both years was 50 percent last year, 60 something the year before in Atlanta. That makes it a markedly different game. You have to beat that team as a team. We didn't play well enough on defense, have to get off the field on defense, and the offense and special teams didn't help the defense.
I just ****ing laughed out loud. I love that ****. It's like arguing with a latin girlfriend. We're talking about why you lied about some phone call that happened at 1AM, and she wants to blow **** up, toss knives and scream that "it happened at 12:45AM!!!"
LMAO!!!!!!
Edit: BTW, I'm not as much of as X & O guy as some of you, but after reading Golden's response, is he not basically saying without even realizing it that we are tipping our hand when we plan on doing certain things?
The Golden hatred has now obviously trumped Shannon.
Idk if this was posted yet.
Q: Your struggling puts a microscope on everything. People are posting pictures of the defense off TV. Like a third and two play in both games, Nebraska and Georgia Tech, they'll snap the screen and it'll show Denzel Perryman, for instance, seven yards off the ball on third and one or third and two and the play gets converted and that opens up a snowstorm of criticism. What would be the explanation for things like that which might be contributing to the struggles in getting off the field on third down?
Golden: Denzel's depth is a function of the defense. Depending what we're doing with the defensive tackles his first gap might have to get outside (and he needs room off the line to get there). He's never supposed to be seven yards, we want him at six. We tried to get him to move up during the game. … in terms of the Georgia Tech game, that was designed. He's designed to be there. The tackles and perhaps one of the outside linebackers who was blitzing is responsible for the dive. Many times he's responsible for the dive because many of the times we're asking him to scrape fast because the outside linebacker is coming. What I'm saying is we move them back in certain instances because we're bringing the outside linebacker and his [Perryman's] gap (would be) outside. I don't know which play you're talking about. The last three years we beat that team running the same stuff. We got takeaways, third down stops, got a fourth down stop. And the offense in both years was 50 percent last year, 60 something the year before in Atlanta. That makes it a markedly different game. You have to beat that team as a team. We didn't play well enough on defense, have to get off the field on defense, and the offense and special teams didn't help the defense.
I just ****ing laughed out loud. I love that ****. It's like arguing with a latin girlfriend. We're talking about why you lied about some phone call that happened at 1AM, and she wants to blow **** up, toss knives and scream that "it happened at 12:45AM!!!"
LMAO!!!!!!
Edit: BTW, I'm not as much of as X & O guy as some of you, but after reading Golden's response, is he not basically saying without even realizing it that we are tipping our hand when we plan on doing certain things?
Yes. But, everyone has known that. Our alignment tips our action each time. Just like last year when our personnel groupings tipped what we'd do on 3rd and long. Now, he's saying "QB, take a look at our LB depth." But, really, any coach worth his salt was seeing that anyway. If FSU and Vtech line up in anything but 4WR and just run repeatedly down our throat, Jimbo and Beamer are openly trying to keep Golden in the ACC.
The Golden hatred has now obviously trumped Shannon.
Shannon was simply pathetic and verbally defensless at the end. Golden is just going to **** everyone off as he tries to vainly talk his way out of an impossible situation. He can't admit his core philosophy is a loser.....it's his career going down the toilet.
The thing I cannot understand is thinking that it's a good idea to have ONLY your interior DL responsible for the dive. It's as if Al Golden went into a coma in 1984 and missed the whole "4-3 over front single gap" movement that essentially whiped out the option as an offense.
Idk if this was posted yet.
Q: Your struggling puts a microscope on everything. People are posting pictures of the defense off TV. Like a third and two play in both games, Nebraska and Georgia Tech, they'll snap the screen and it'll show Denzel Perryman, for instance, seven yards off the ball on third and one or third and two and the play gets converted and that opens up a snowstorm of criticism. What would be the explanation for things like that which might be contributing to the struggles in getting off the field on third down?
Golden: Denzel's depth is a function of the defense. Depending what we're doing with the defensive tackles his first gap might have to get outside (and he needs room off the line to get there). He's never supposed to be seven yards, we want him at six. We tried to get him to move up during the game. … in terms of the Georgia Tech game, that was designed. He's designed to be there. The tackles and perhaps one of the outside linebackers who was blitzing is responsible for the dive. Many times he's responsible for the dive because many of the times we're asking him to scrape fast because the outside linebacker is coming. What I'm saying is we move them back in certain instances because we're bringing the outside linebacker and his [Perryman's] gap (would be) outside. I don't know which play you're talking about. The last three years we beat that team running the same stuff. We got takeaways, third down stops, got a fourth down stop. And the offense in both years was 50 percent last year, 60 something the year before in Atlanta. That makes it a markedly different game. You have to beat that team as a team. We didn't play well enough on defense, have to get off the field on defense, and the offense and special teams didn't help the defense.
I just ****ing laughed out loud. I love that ****. It's like arguing with a latin girlfriend. We're talking about why you lied about some phone call that happened at 1AM, and she wants to blow **** up, toss knives and scream that "it happened at 12:45AM!!!"
Dline has to handle the dive regardless if 7, 8 or 9 in the box. A Dline that disrupts the dive screws everything up with this offense. I saw guys getting blown off the ball on occasion. Perryman has to clean everything else up. It's not fun to defend.