forums

Tears Gator Tears

Advertisement
flagator86 said:
@RVACane sooooo Asa Martin gonna be a Gator lol
Click to expand...


What in the actual ****?

1673919269726.jpeg
 
Advertisement
Highline17 said:
Idk how an alleged accredited recruiting site can give a 80 spot climb this late, you either didn’t scout him in the first place or you have an agenda, because there is no new tape of him.
Click to expand...
I’ve always deduced that all the recruiting sites alter their rankings to attract more subscribers but something like this is just ridiculous. I mean, a kid’s high school career is over and somehow got an 80 spot bump in their rankings despite not playing a single down?
 
flagator86 said:
Click to expand...

The funny undertone in this is that in order for this to be true, that means some big booster or other UF supporter "pledged" money to the collective or alternatively a completely separate business and GC wrote the contract. THEN the prominent booster or UF supporter allegedly reneged on the promise and failed to come through. Who knows why. Maybe they were expecting help from other sources, maybe a loan was denied, maybe their business took a ****, regardless the promise did not happen.

Now Heitner is trying to clear GC's name and saying they may have a "claim" for promissory estoppel basically the GC detrimentally relied on the promise of the booster so they should not be held liable to Rashada, liability essentially passes through GC to the booster. But in order to do that you now need to sue the person who at one point was promising to donate tons of cash. Once you sue that person I would find it hard to believe that person turns around and is quick to donate again.
 
Advertisement
Cookie917 said:
The funny undertone in this is that in order for this to be true, that means some big booster or other UF supporter "pledged" money to the collective or alternatively a completely separate business and GC wrote the contract. THEN the prominent booster or UF supporter allegedly reneged on the promise and failed to come through. Who knows why. Maybe they were expecting help from other sources, maybe a loan was denied, maybe their business took a ****, regardless the promise did not happen.

Now Heitner is trying to clear GC's name and saying they may have a "claim" for promissory estoppel basically the GC detrimentally relied on the promise of the booster so they should not be held liable to Rashada, liability essentially passes through GC to the booster. But in order to do that you now need to sue the person who at one point was promising to donate tons of cash. Once you sue that person I would find it hard to believe that person turns around and is quick to donate again.
Click to expand...
He specifically used the word promise not pledge so I’m assuming he’s asking this rhetorically. Either way they’ve made a mess of it.
 
Cookie917 said:
The funny undertone in this is that in order for this to be true, that means some big booster or other UF supporter "pledged" money to the collective or alternatively a completely separate business and GC wrote the contract. THEN the prominent booster or UF supporter allegedly reneged on the promise and failed to come through. Who knows why. Maybe they were expecting help from other sources, maybe a loan was denied, maybe their business took a ****, regardless the promise did not happen.

Now Heitner is trying to clear GC's name and saying they may have a "claim" for promissory estoppel basically the GC detrimentally relied on the promise of the booster so they should not be held liable to Rashada, liability essentially passes through GC to the booster. But in order to do that you now need to sue the person who at one point was promising to donate tons of cash. Once you sue that person I would find it hard to believe that person turns around and is quick to donate again.
Click to expand...
It’s beautiful
 
Back
Top