forums

Tears Gator Tears

Advertisement
90510
 
RattlerCane305 said:
Definitely true. Former Ms. Virginia and Mrs. Lawrence before marrying Emmitt. **** bruh, you were married to a woman who came in 2nd to a woman who married one of my generation's greatest comedians and the NFL's all-time leading rusher?!?! And you're married to a Dominicana that, based on my general knowledge of Dominicanas plus that fun fact you dropped on us, I would assume is 5 alarm smokin'?!?! Maybe we need to get you in a recruiting position on staff. Let's not even make it hard on you, would you agree to cover from South Jersey to the Tidewater?
Click to expand...

Rva got mad cash or a huge crank.....or both.

I’m proud to call him my amigo.
 
Advertisement
TrueFloridian said:
I love how all the responses are in for a PWO but the OP says he's offered a scholly. How does all this work with their counters is my question.
Click to expand...


Yeah, the kid is clearly reported to be getting a scholarship, and the star-whores try to downgrade him to a preferred walk-on. Brilliant.

I would imagine that when you combine the "in the works since April" and all of the other academic risks that Mullet signed, this kid has been on the "waitlist" for months. Even though the 2 WRs supposedly got their test scores, UF may have better knowledge (than Swamp 247 posters) that one or both test score improvements are being flagged. OR they could have info on Wardrick Wilson being denied a student visa. I would imagine that if this kid was replacing Wilson as an IC, it's a straight 1-for-1 replacement, but if one or both of the WRs fail to quality, then it still counts as a hit against the IC numbers.
 
Cribby said:
Rva got mad cash or a huge crank.....or both.

I’m proud to call him my amigo.
Click to expand...


It could be one of those Parks & Recreation situations, where Jerry's wife was played by Christie Brinkley, and then in another episode, a doctor divulged that Jerry had one of the biggest endowments the doctor had ever seen.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
Yeah, the kid is clearly reported to be getting a scholarship, and the star-whores try to downgrade him to a preferred walk-on. Brilliant.

I would imagine that when you combine the "in the works since April" and all of the other academic risks that Mullet signed, this kid has been on the "waitlist" for months. Even though the 2 WRs supposedly got their test scores, UF may have better knowledge (than Swamp 247 posters) that one or both test score improvements are being flagged. OR they could have info on Wardrick Wilson being denied a student visa. I would imagine that if this kid was replacing Wilson as an IC, it's a straight 1-for-1 replacement, but if one or both of the WRs fail to quality, then it still counts as a hit against the IC numbers.
Click to expand...
I thought I read somewhere that one of their guys had a 300 point jump in his score and it got flagged. I could be mistaken but I thought I saw that.
 
Advertisement
RVACane said:
I thought I read somewhere that one of their guys had a 300 point jump in his score and it got flagged. I could be mistaken but I thought I saw that.
Click to expand...


Yeah, some douchey guy on their board was saying it was more like 250 points, but still.

AND they were using Gaytor Mathz. So, westlake gaytor was yapping about a score increase from a 600 to a 900 being a "50% increase". But the reality is that the low end of the SAT scale is a 400. That means that the original test score of a 600 is only 200 points above the minimum, and thus a 300 point increase would be a 150% increase in the test score.

So, yeah, they don't really know what they are talking about. As I mentioned several pages back, it is statistically more unrealistic to go from a 600 to a 900 than it is to go from a 1200 to a 1500. Just being honest.

I wouldn't put those 2 WRs on the active roster quite yet. Clearinghouse will still have their say, and as I mentioned before, in the post-Aunt-Becky world, going from a 600 to a 900 on your VERY LAST ATTEMPT without some solid evidence of prep course work is just...ridiculous.

Go back and read that Gaytor thread, one guy is adamant that nobody can invalidate SAT scores without proof of cheating. Sadly, ETS does it ALL THE TIME, just because they believe a score increase is too high and/or unrealistic. When I worked for Princeton Review, that was one of our "bragging" points, that we had numerous students that ETS flagged for SAT score improvements (this was back in the 80s and 90s when ETS didn't have very good monitoring systems, so they just assumed everyone was cheating). Now, ETS makes up a bunch of nonsense that they DON'T invalidate scores based on score improvements, but that is a lie, as it is usually the primary evidence that they cite when people sue them.

Here's just one example of a score being invalidated FROM THE PAST YEAR:

thehill.com

College Board invalidates student’s SAT after she retakes test and improves scores

The College Board invalidated a Florida high school student’s SAT results after she retook the exam to improve her score by 330 points.{mosads}Kamilah Campbell of Miami Gardens, Fla., originally go…
thehill.com thehill.com
 
Back
Top