- Joined
- Aug 3, 2012
- Messages
- 7,288
I just can’t wrap my head around the ATM gameplan and what we’ve seen the last few weeks.
I think it's two things. One, a2m played a ton of man coverage and TVD has all day to throw. They didn't make any substantive adjustments either, whereas everyone else has played a ton of zone. Secondly, we couldn't run on a2m, and we conceded that, so we stayed spread out and varied the pace just enough.
We basically hummed along like this heading into GT, where Mario probably got a boner when he saw BGSU ran all over them. Insert our tight formations and personnel groupings which have maybe 2 players who are a threat for anything other than a HB dive.
We've doubled down on this ever since, and almost never break tendencies, so it's a massive advantage to the defense when they're 80%+ sure which direction you're going, and because of the personnel, they won't get hurt too badly if they guess wrong.
That's where we are today-- a BROBALL philosophy with some Air Rad sprinkled in-- the path of most resistance.
Our OL is very good, but they can't block 8 or 9 people unless you help them out. If you aren't going to spread teams out consistently in the run game, then you need to work in some middle screens, PA passes to the TE (Winslow route from the Coker T), or put someone like Brashard wide in the formation to attract attention and draw somebody out of the box to help.
I am not going to defend TVD, even with these flaws he's had opportunities to do QB1 things and has failed. That said, he has beaten zone coverages before because Lashlee was a lot better about adjusting to them. When teams like UVA drop 8, run RPO and give the ball or throw the bubble until teams have to account for that and then send your vertical routes downfield.