Wait a second. What's the argument here? Is it that we're running great route concepts or that we're not in order to limit reads for Rosier (and protect him)? Or both?
And, how does HurricaneVision's review (which does not go through every single play, unless I'm missing something) support either? He questioned route concepts (all verts) in some parts. He picked out route combinations he really liked in others.
Outside of the 50/50 balls, I actually didn't have a problem with how we attacked in the passing game. Thought it was pretty solid given Rosier's attributes. But, I don't see any overwhelming evidence from this breakdown supporting either side.
Then you are spot on in your assessment. I don't do every single play (some are straightforward).
I have absolutely no agenda. I go through the plays as they occur on my playbook. I write as I go and often times I'll see a coverage and expect a certain route but that's not what we do. Richt knows a lot more than I do about football so I'm not trying to portray anything different.
My memory is probably hazy, but I thought I did show a play where McCloud made a nice play and pointed it out, but I could be wrong.
I totally agree we attacked well in the passing game outside of the frequency of back-shoulder throws, and even that got them to adjust their zones to protect against them and we picked up a nine yard gain because of it on an important drive in the game.
I'd have even liked to take more of the bubbles. That is really hard to guard against when we block well on the edge and they play us so soft.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk