TedHendricksOffspring
Junior
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 1,865
So, if we hire Kiffin ... And the accompanying articles talk about his recruiting prowess and his reputation as an OC wizard, then you'll be good with the hire?
#BeConsistent
And do you not remember the number of talking heads who tried to convince us Al Golden was the right hire when he got the job? Or when Troy Drayton was quoted in the paper talking about how "aggressive" Mark D'Onofrio was going to be as our DC?
Those links are all propaganda, and it's standard operating procedure when a new coach is hired.
Carroll just happened to hit his stride at USC, and now continues it in Seattle.
But it remains, he wasn't a hot name / preferred choice to take the USC job in 2000.
And BTW ... If every USC HC candidate is quality, what's your knock against Kiffin, again?
#GotEeeM
Did you really link the USC press announcement to validate they were happy about the hire???
LOL
USC Goes Carrolling - latimes
And yet there was a strong contingency that was happy he was hired.
LOL
You're foolin'!
Read that linked article in CONTEXT (see what I did)...
The tone of that article is that Carroll was an unpopular choice for the position.
How do I know?
The 4th line of the article ...
"I've been an unpopular choice in the past," Carroll says. "What it is, it's a challenge."
He wasn't a "hot name" ... It's not an opinion, it's fact. He wasn't their top choice ... Again, not an opinion ... It's fact.
#LetItGo
But I did find this part of the article interesting ...
So USC represents a new chance for a man still trying to prove he can be a successful head coach. He retains a reputation for being smart and energetic, a defensive specialist who molded top-ranked squads with the Jets and later, as a coordinator, with the San Francisco 49ers.
... Even though Carroll was 49 when he got the USC job, he was still trying to prove he could be a successful HC ...
Timing Isn't Entirely on Carroll's Side - latimes
I see that you tried to use my context line and did not succeed.
The tone of the article is that he wasn't as good as the other three candidates but when you're USC, every candidate you seriously consider is quality. It's like complaining about a 93% on a test. What aren't you getting? #ApologyAccepted .
That part of the article is interesting. Notice also how it says that he had fielded top units in the NFL and mentions his playoff appearances later in the article. Almost as if definitions of success vary or something.
Negative, Ghost Rider because as I've already stated Kiffin had elite athletes and lost and when that happens recruiting is a moot point. And the key to being a good head coach is the balance of both offense and defense. Why don't we just hire Mike Leach for less if all we want is a crazy offense and some good recruits? #UnderstandContext .
I bought that Golden was the guy hook, line, and sinker but I also popped open good ole Youtube and saw that D'Onofrio was anything but aggressive so they can try and convince me of whatever they like but the tape didn't lie then and it's been validated by now.
So the links that back you up are true but mine are false? Grab a bench. He was a hot name because people knew he was and enough people wanted him. Being fourth known or wanted doesn't invalidate your own popularity. Give it up.
And it's easy why Kiffin was hired. He had USC ties and his father is USC royalty so they gave him his shot, he bombed, and they gave him the boot at the TSA gate. His defenses sucked, for being an offensive genius they could have and should have been better, and he had talent advantages and big time athletes and sucked with them. That's the knock and that's what separates a quality coaching candidate from a quality coach. #GotNothing .
Last edited: