Feldman on Finebaum

So, if we hire Kiffin ... And the accompanying articles talk about his recruiting prowess and his reputation as an OC wizard, then you'll be good with the hire?

#BeConsistent

And do you not remember the number of talking heads who tried to convince us Al Golden was the right hire when he got the job? Or when Troy Drayton was quoted in the paper talking about how "aggressive" Mark D'Onofrio was going to be as our DC?

Those links are all propaganda, and it's standard operating procedure when a new coach is hired.

Carroll just happened to hit his stride at USC, and now continues it in Seattle.

But it remains, he wasn't a hot name / preferred choice to take the USC job in 2000.

And BTW ... If every USC HC candidate is quality, what's your knock against Kiffin, again?

#GotEeeM


Did you really link the USC press announcement to validate they were happy about the hire???

LOL

USC Goes Carrolling - latimes

And yet there was a strong contingency that was happy he was hired.

LOL

You're foolin'!

Read that linked article in CONTEXT (see what I did)...

The tone of that article is that Carroll was an unpopular choice for the position.

How do I know?

The 4th line of the article ...

"I've been an unpopular choice in the past," Carroll says. "What it is, it's a challenge."

He wasn't a "hot name" ... It's not an opinion, it's fact. He wasn't their top choice ... Again, not an opinion ... It's fact.

#LetItGo

But I did find this part of the article interesting ...

So USC represents a new chance for a man still trying to prove he can be a successful head coach. He retains a reputation for being smart and energetic, a defensive specialist who molded top-ranked squads with the Jets and later, as a coordinator, with the San Francisco 49ers.

... Even though Carroll was 49 when he got the USC job, he was still trying to prove he could be a successful HC ...

Timing Isn't Entirely on Carroll's Side - latimes

I see that you tried to use my context line and did not succeed.

The tone of the article is that he wasn't as good as the other three candidates but when you're USC, every candidate you seriously consider is quality. It's like complaining about a 93% on a test. What aren't you getting? #ApologyAccepted .

That part of the article is interesting. Notice also how it says that he had fielded top units in the NFL and mentions his playoff appearances later in the article. Almost as if definitions of success vary or something.

Negative, Ghost Rider because as I've already stated Kiffin had elite athletes and lost and when that happens recruiting is a moot point. And the key to being a good head coach is the balance of both offense and defense. Why don't we just hire Mike Leach for less if all we want is a crazy offense and some good recruits? #UnderstandContext .

I bought that Golden was the guy hook, line, and sinker but I also popped open good ole Youtube and saw that D'Onofrio was anything but aggressive so they can try and convince me of whatever they like but the tape didn't lie then and it's been validated by now.

So the links that back you up are true but mine are false? Grab a bench. He was a hot name because people knew he was and enough people wanted him. Being fourth known or wanted doesn't invalidate your own popularity. Give it up.

And it's easy why Kiffin was hired. He had USC ties and his father is USC royalty so they gave him his shot, he bombed, and they gave him the boot at the TSA gate. His defenses sucked, for being an offensive genius they could have and should have been better, and he had talent advantages and big time athletes and sucked with them. That's the knock and that's what separates a quality coaching candidate from a quality coach. #GotNothing .
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
So the links that back you up are true but mine are false? Grab a bench. He was a hot name because people knew he was and enough people wanted him. Being fourth known or wanted doesn't invalidate your own popularity. Give it up.

I'm quoting YOUR links. lol

Your links validate that Carroll was an unpopular choice. He was viewed at "Paul Hackett 2.0", and the fan base wasn't interested because they had just fired version 1. lol

And on what planet is being the 4th candidate for something not indicative of your popularity? #YouSoCrazy

You're basing your point on the result that Carroll is now an all-time great, so they made the right hire and he was a quality coach! But nobody expected that any more than Kirby expected Al Golden to be the one to lead us back ... Meaning it was a hope and a prayer!

With the rare exception of Urban Meyer and Nick Saban, maybe Chip Kelly, there are no "sure things" in today's game, IMO ...

Regarding Carroll ... USC got lucky with a guy who was widely considered to be a wizard on 1 side of the ball, but had failed in 2 previous HC opportunities. No context needed ...

We're gonna have to get lucky, too ...
 
Last edited:
He lost to the best RB in the conference and the second best in the country. That's how it goes sometimes when he was taking over a team that had won 8 games once since 1997. He rushed for 136 yards and it was Butch's second game back so there might have been just some slight work to be done.

I'm glad you asked because I just looked it up and those NC State teams actually had a total 9 players drafted while Butch was there and a total of 19 players overall if you go all the way through graduation. Even I'm surprised it's that many. Other than that 2008 team though, no NC State team whooped him. You must've made another mistake.

Best RB in Conference USA? But Johnson was only a small portion of the 470 yards given up? That's it the second best RB in the country and 2 NFL practice squad players beat your god and his 7 real NFL players? LMAO!!

I would be upset as well if Butch was my idol and he got whooped by sorry NC State teams too.

Sorry.

It was his second game back, that you have still ignored, and he still contributed over 250 totals yards if you combine his returning, which he was first team all-American for, and receiving. That's what a beast can do when you've only been on the job for a few months. Don't forget context, my friend!

I would be upset too if that had happened. You seem to have ignored my point of the NFL players, which is odd. But other than that 2008 game, with much more NFL talent than I thought they had, your whoop theory is false.

I accept your apology.

Second game back excuse? Well dam, how many games does he need to get acclimated? NC State whopped him, year 1, year 2, year 3 , AND year 4. My bad, barely beat him year 1, barely beat him year 2, whooped him year 3, and barely beat him year 4. Whew, don't want to make it seem like they were not close games or that NC State own him.

Apology Accepted!

Blandy & Mr. Whipple: 33
Butch: 10

Nuff said.

We didn't even get to sorry *** 3-9 Virginia yet
:ibis-roflmao-sm4:
 
Last edited:
So the links that back you up are true but mine are false? Grab a bench. He was a hot name because people knew he was and enough people wanted him. Being fourth known or wanted doesn't invalidate your own popularity. Give it up.

I'm quoting YOUR links. lol

Your links validate that Carroll was an unpopular choice. He was viewed at "Paul Hackett 2.0", and the fan base wasn't interested because they had just fired version 1. lol

And on what planet is being the 4th candidate for something not indicative of your popularity? #YouSoCrazy

You're basing your point on the result that Carroll is now an all-time great, so they made the right hire and he was a quality coach! But nobody expected that any more than Kirby expected Al Golden to be the one to lead us back ... Meaning it was a hope and a prayer!

With the rare exception of Urban Meyer and Nick Saban, maybe Chip Kelly, there are no "sure things" in today's game, IMO ...

Regarding Carroll ... USC got lucky with a guy who was widely considered to be a wizard on 1 side of the ball, but had failed in 2 previous HC opportunities. No context needed ...

We're gonna have to get lucky, too ...

Both links I provided showed that significant portions of the fan base were to have him. What are you reading? There was a clear split in the fan base.

If you Don Shula, Bill Belichick, Vince Lombardi, and Bill Walsh all wanted to coach your team, the fourth most popular member of that group is not necessarily unpopular just not as popular as the others. #YouAreDeliberatelyPretendingNotToUnderstandMe .

In his tenure with the Patriots, Peter Carroll took them to the playoffs 67% of the time and he went to the playoffs 50% of the time he was in the NFL prior to the Seahawks. On what planet does that make him a reach as a football coach? He was quality before he went into the stratosphere with USC and the Seahawks so he doesn't best fit the point that you're trying to make but let's get to it. Any hiring of a coach is generally a gamble and some pan out and some don't. Some have better credentials and qualities than others and that goes without saying. Carroll, who had a much better resume than you would be led to believe, was still a gamble but a safer one. Al Golden was a much bigger gamble and in hindsight with all the more thorough analysis we have done there was enough evidence to be concerned about him even though he was the hottest young name going. Your hope and a prayer slogan is generally right but there are exceptions and we're naming them.

Sure things are a rarity in the game now but I think there's more than just those three and I think the definition of, "sure thing," can be unique to each school. Charlie Strong, as an example, would kill it down here immediately. He won at Louisville with basically all Miami talent and he schematically fits the school style. Texas is another story and the jury is still out but it doesn't look good thus far for him. Golden would succeed at a Purdue or Northwestern, not here though.

Carroll went to the playoffs 2 out of 3 times with the Patriots. He won a playoff game. How is that failing? Bob Kraft is on record saying that he didn't give Carroll a fair shot when he fired him. No context is needed because he's just flat out being misrepresented.

We will have to get lucky. While we're here, who are your top 5 then, in order. You seem to be not as hot on Kiffin as other candidates so let's hear them.
 
Last edited:
1. The links you provided are standard articles AFTER a new coach is hired. The articles attempt to be even handed, but lean toward the optimistic side.

Read this board ... Even in year 5, Al Golden still has some supporters.

I never said "every USC fan and booster" was opposed to the hire, but there were enough for Pete to know that he was an "unpopular choice", as he called himself in the linked article you shared.


2. Pete wasn't close to being on the Mt. Rushmore of coaches when USC hired him. He was fired by New England because he underperformed their expectations. That team had gone to the Super Bowl the year before he was hired.

Remember my reference to Kiffin winning 66% of his first 40 games in his time at USC, and 65% for his career there? You discount that because you would argue he had enough talent to win more than that, right? (And for the record, Kiffin has won 63% of his games as a college HC, and NEVER had a losing season in college)

Well, Kraft felt the same way about the team he gave Carroll. He expected better, given where they were when he was hired. Pete went 10-6, 9-7, and 8-8 with a team that was just in the Super Bowl.

So you telling me Pete's playoffs stats after taking over a team that had just been to the Super Bowl doesn't validate your position. He was given a playoff team, and they got worse each successive year.


3. I think Strong could work at Miami, I think Kiffin could work, I think Chad Morris could work, I think Justin Fuente could work, I think Dana Holgorsen could work. I'd also be curious to see Bryan Harsin (but he ain't leaving Boise)

Oh, and I think Golden would do very well at Purdue and Illinois ... Completely agree with you on that!


4. But my Top 5 realistic pursuits would be:

Doug Marrone
Hue Jackson
Mike Shula
Lane Kiffin
And whoever finishes with the best season out of Morris (relatively speaking), Fuente, and Holgorsen.
 
Advertisement
LMAO. Honestly I love being a hurricanes fan sometimes. We have a coach under contract until 2020 and argue every day over whether he should be fired or not. As if that wasn't enough , now we are picking fights over who the replacement will be for that same coach, who hasn't even been fired yet, and who might not even be on the hotseat. We will obviously never ever agree on anything.
 
1. The links you provided are standard articles AFTER a new coach is hired. The articles attempt to be even handed, but lean toward the optimistic side.

Read this board ... Even in year 5, Al Golden still has some supporters.

I never said "every USC fan and booster" was opposed to the hire, but there were enough for Pete to know that he was an "unpopular choice", as he called himself in the linked article you shared.


2. Pete wasn't close to being on the Mt. Rushmore of coaches when USC hired him. He was fired by New England because he underperformed their expectations. That team had gone to the Super Bowl the year before he was hired.

Remember my reference to Kiffin winning 66% of his first 40 games in his time at USC, and 65% for his career there? You discount that because you would argue he had enough talent to win more than that, right? (And for the record, Kiffin has won 63% of his games as a college HC, and NEVER had a losing season in college)

Well, Kraft felt the same way about the team he gave Carroll. He expected better, given where they were when he was hired. Pete went 10-6, 9-7, and 8-8 with a team that was just in the Super Bowl.

So you telling me Pete's playoffs stats after taking over a team that had just been to the Super Bowl doesn't validate your position. He was given a playoff team, and they got worse each successive year.


3. I think Strong could work at Miami, I think Kiffin could work, I think Chad Morris could work, I think Justin Fuente could work, I think Dana Holgorsen could work. I'd also be curious to see Bryan Harsin (but he ain't leaving Boise)

Oh, and I think Golden would do very well at Purdue and Illinois ... Completely agree with you on that!


4. But my Top 5 realistic pursuits would be:

Doug Marrone
Hue Jackson
Mike Shula
Lane Kiffin
And whoever finishes with the best season out of Morris (relatively speaking), Fuente, and Holgorsen.

I just threw up in my mouth with that wish list!! 1,3 &4.......no f'ing way!!
 
I don't think Kiffin was ready to be a head coach, and he showed it, but he was operating with extreme sanctions and fielded a couple teams with less than 60 guys on the roster.

I live in LA, and I found it funny that while Al was constantly bringing up losing 9 scholarships, the cloud and all these sanctions, nobody in LA gave a **** about what Kiffin was dealing with in terms of sanctions. ****, compared to how often Folden brought it up, you'd have thought USC had gotten a slap on the wrist and had a full team. Kiffin would lose a class of 20 or so upperclassman and have to fill it with a max of 15 freshmen. Every year his roster got smaller, younger and less experienced. He wasn't a very good HC, but he actually dealt with debilitating sanctions and got better results than Folden.

I'm curious to see what he does at his next HC gig, after experiencing failure and getting a chance to learn under Saban. I wouldn't be opposed to Kiffin at Miami, but he wouldn't be choice number one. At this point, anyone is going to be better than Folden. An empty beer can could coach better than him.
 
LOL

I'm always amused by the "no patrol".

No alternative is offered, just "no". No rationale offered for the no, just "no" ... lol

... but thanks for being ok with Hue Jackson ... lol

Hey, Miami is not a college town ... We need a big city coach, who won't be bothered by the sparse crowds we'll bring to Sun Life. And having NFL connections and/or aspirations is what this program needs.

Marrone was OC with New Orleans, and did some HC work when Payton was out. He'd leave Jacksonville

Hue Jackson coached at USC. he's been an upgrade to Jay Gruden with the Bengals

A Shula coaching the Canes in intriguing to me. He'd probably bring Dorsey, unless they promoted Dorsey to his spot.

I think Kiffin would do well ...

All of those guys would do well with brad Kaaya, and prepare him for the NFL, IMO.

1. The links you provided are standard articles AFTER a new coach is hired. The articles attempt to be even handed, but lean toward the optimistic side.

Read this board ... Even in year 5, Al Golden still has some supporters.

I never said "every USC fan and booster" was opposed to the hire, but there were enough for Pete to know that he was an "unpopular choice", as he called himself in the linked article you shared.


2. Pete wasn't close to being on the Mt. Rushmore of coaches when USC hired him. He was fired by New England because he underperformed their expectations. That team had gone to the Super Bowl the year before he was hired.

Remember my reference to Kiffin winning 66% of his first 40 games in his time at USC, and 65% for his career there? You discount that because you would argue he had enough talent to win more than that, right? (And for the record, Kiffin has won 63% of his games as a college HC, and NEVER had a losing season in college)

Well, Kraft felt the same way about the team he gave Carroll. He expected better, given where they were when he was hired. Pete went 10-6, 9-7, and 8-8 with a team that was just in the Super Bowl.

So you telling me Pete's playoffs stats after taking over a team that had just been to the Super Bowl doesn't validate your position. He was given a playoff team, and they got worse each successive year.


3. I think Strong could work at Miami, I think Kiffin could work, I think Chad Morris could work, I think Justin Fuente could work, I think Dana Holgorsen could work. I'd also be curious to see Bryan Harsin (but he ain't leaving Boise)

Oh, and I think Golden would do very well at Purdue and Illinois ... Completely agree with you on that!


4. But my Top 5 realistic pursuits would be:

Doug Marrone
Hue Jackson
Mike Shula
Lane Kiffin
And whoever finishes with the best season out of Morris (relatively speaking), Fuente, and Holgorsen.

I just threw up in my mouth with that wish list!! 1,3 &4.......no f'ing way!!
 
Advertisement
1. The links you provided are standard articles AFTER a new coach is hired. The articles attempt to be even handed, but lean toward the optimistic side.

Read this board ... Even in year 5, Al Golden still has some supporters.

I never said "every USC fan and booster" was opposed to the hire, but there were enough for Pete to know that he was an "unpopular choice", as he called himself in the linked article you shared.


2. Pete wasn't close to being on the Mt. Rushmore of coaches when USC hired him. He was fired by New England because he underperformed their expectations. That team had gone to the Super Bowl the year before he was hired.

Remember my reference to Kiffin winning 66% of his first 40 games in his time at USC, and 65% for his career there? You discount that because you would argue he had enough talent to win more than that, right? (And for the record, Kiffin has won 63% of his games as a college HC, and NEVER had a losing season in college)

Well, Kraft felt the same way about the team he gave Carroll. He expected better, given where they were when he was hired. Pete went 10-6, 9-7, and 8-8 with a team that was just in the Super Bowl.

So you telling me Pete's playoffs stats after taking over a team that had just been to the Super Bowl doesn't validate your position. He was given a playoff team, and they got worse each successive year.


3. I think Strong could work at Miami, I think Kiffin could work, I think Chad Morris could work, I think Justin Fuente could work, I think Dana Holgorsen could work. I'd also be curious to see Bryan Harsin (but he ain't leaving Boise)

Oh, and I think Golden would do very well at Purdue and Illinois ... Completely agree with you on that!


4. But my Top 5 realistic pursuits would be:

Doug Marrone
Hue Jackson
Mike Shula
Lane Kiffin
And whoever finishes with the best season out of Morris (relatively speaking), Fuente, and Holgorsen.

1. Well that's when most articles about the subject are going to be written. It says it was an 18 day process to his being hired to so there was quite a lull. Not sure what you expect article wise and if they do lean optimistically, maybe there's a reason for that. Year 5 is after a mountain of evidence says Golden sucks and the people who support him make up maybe 10% of the fan base. Comparing Just Hired attitudes and Year 5 attitudes isn't a valid comparison. I didn't say you said EVERY USC person was unhappy with the hire and I know Carroll referred to himself as unpopular but I would bet he and the fan base would be aware that probably over 50% were happy with the hire and that's the majority last time I checked otherwise they wouldn't have hired him.

2. I also didn't say he was on the Mt. Rushmore of coaches but he wasn't a janitor either. His resume was way above par. And underperforming to expectations, especially at the NFL level, is way more different than at the college level. Going to the playoffs in your first two years and then getting fired is lunacy even if the predecessor went to the Super Bowl because of the shift to the position and the gap between the best and worst team in the NFL is a lot smaller than the best and worst teams in college. The, "expectation," argument isn't valid. And I'd have to look for other examples but the coach who replaced Vince Lombardi had a losing record from the jump so taking over a Super Bowl team, a dynasty in this case, and winning immediately are hardly commonplace at the NFL level.

Talent, in the NFL, has the smallest gaps. Kiffin's team were coming off of 7 straight seasons of 9 or more wins and 6 seasons of 11 or more wins. The cupboard was overflowing in a very weak conference except for Oregon and Stanford on the rise and I showed that Kiffin recruited just fine while there so his talent advantage wasn't miniscule like it is for NFL teams. It was exceedingly massive. And if the argument is about getting worse, Kiffin got worse as he brought more talent in and expectation wise he went from consensus preseason #1 to unranked. That's totally different from the NFL dynamic where the difference between the Dolphins and the Patriots is better QB play and nothing more. It's that small a difference. The descent in wins for both guys is completely different where Kiffin got trounced against Meh competition when he should've been getting better and the guy who fired Carroll said it was unfair so that kind of peters out.

3. Strong would kill it and I already explained why with the whole Miami experience and defensive links. Kiffin doesn't recruit the area and never has and obviously with Cristobal on staff at Alabama that makes sense but even at USC there was a little to no South Florida recruiting. Chad Morris does nothing but recruit Florida and now in Texas that should give two recruiting areas of death. I'll reserve judgment until after the season because SMU stinks but I've got faith. Fuente turned around a SOUTHERN school against teams that play sound football rather than athletic football and he did in a dangerous city that mirrors Miami. The link is obvious. Dana Holgorsen would not have the players like all the Miramar kids that he wants and he's 28-23 at West Virginia despite having a huge strictly athletic advantage. Bryan Harsin seems both comfortable and too Idaho-ian for Miami which I know Dennis Erickson basically was as well but he was an innovative genius and the machine was humming then so that's why it worked.

4. Doug Marrone=Sucks. Overachieved at Syracuse, really impressed me with the Bills especially defensively and even more specifically in the secondary but he is a massive douche and the fact that he went from 6-10 to 9-7, overplayed his hand when Ralph Wilson died, and then could only get an OL coaching job with the Jaguars does not inspire confidence. Arrogant dude who the players could take or leave and his evaluation of EJ Manual as a 1st rounder is all I need to see. Pass.

Hue Jackson=Love him. Got to see him have the Raiders on the right track until Al died and then he overplayed his hand with Mark Davis. I think he'd be spectacular too. Beloved by the players and really has philosophies scheme wise that I enjoy.

Mike Shula=Great recruiter, **** schemer. He stocked the cupboard for Saban right out of the gate who took Shula's guys and went 12-2 in Year 2. That's damaging. He also has NCAA issues and I've seen his awful play calling of 3 and 2 calling for a bomb. Since Chudzinski left as the coordinator, Newton and the offense has regressed even though Ken Dorsey taught him to actually read a defense.

Lane Kiffin=Satan incarnate. Probably clubs baby seals in his spare time while making terrorist plots. But really he had spectacular players and athletes and failed with them. Badly. Talent went up and wins went down. Got a raw deal at USC but he did not help himself. He's not even two years removed from being fired so I don't know how much better he can be now by learning under Saban so I'll pass. He's probably a part time **** too.

My top 6:

1. Charlie Strong
2. Butch Davis
3. Mark Stoops
4. Justin Fuente
5. Jim Leavitt
6. Rod Chudzinski. I make an exception for his lack of head coaching experience at either level for his full Miami ties, excellent play calling, understanding of athletes, and willingness to be aggressive.
 
Last edited:
Lane Kiffin=Satan incarnate. Probably clubs baby seals in his spare time while making terrorist plots. But really he had spectacular players and athletes and failed with them. Badly. Talent went up and wins went down. Got a raw deal at USC but he did not help himself. He's not even two years removed from being fired so I don't know how much better he can be now by learning under Saban so I'll pass. He's probably a part time **** too.

Literally, made me laugh out loud.

Thanks for that!

And thanks for the debate!

Go Canes!
 
Last edited:
LMAO. Honestly I love being a hurricanes fan sometimes. We have a coach under contract until 2020 and argue every day over whether he should be fired or not. As if that wasn't enough , now we are picking fights over who the replacement will be for that same coach, who hasn't even been fired yet, and who might not even be on the hotseat. We will obviously never ever agree on anything.

I HATE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nice Butch quote, by the way.
 
Lane Kiffin=Satan incarnate. Probably clubs baby seals in his spare time while making terrorist plots. But really he had spectacular players and athletes and failed with them. Badly. Talent went up and wins went down. Got a raw deal at USC but he did not help himself. He's not even two years removed from being fired so I don't know how much better he can be now by learning under Saban so I'll pass. He's probably a part time **** too.

Literally, made me laugh out loud.

Thanks for that!

And thanks for the debate!

Go Canes!

That's what I was going for and my pleasure.

I'm glad there was some real at least resembling football analysis and debate. I'll confess that I STILL don't want him as head coach BUT, you did make cut him a little bit more slack. Still don't want him.

Go 'Canes!
 
Advertisement
Lane Kiffin=Satan incarnate. Probably clubs baby seals in his spare time while making terrorist plots. But really he had spectacular players and athletes and failed with them. Badly. Talent went up and wins went down. Got a raw deal at USC but he did not help himself. He's not even two years removed from being fired so I don't know how much better he can be now by learning under Saban so I'll pass. He's probably a part time **** too.

Literally, made me laugh out loud.

Thanks for that!

And thanks for the debate!

Go Canes!

That's what I was going for and my pleasure.

I'm glad there was some real at least resembling football analysis and debate. I'll confess that I STILL don't want him as head coach BUT, you did make cut him a little bit more slack. Still don't want him.

Go 'Canes!


Step Brothers - Did We Just Become Best Friends? - YouTube
 
At this point we need a miracle.

We need to get absurdly lucky with an up-and-coming coach, or have someone like Chip Kelly fall into our lap because they imploded in the NFL.

Here's hoping the Iggles go 3-13.
 
I don't think Kiffin was ready to be a head coach, and he showed it, but he was operating with extreme sanctions and fielded a couple teams with less than 60 guys on the roster.

I live in LA, and I found it funny that while Al was constantly bringing up losing 9 scholarships, the cloud and all these sanctions, nobody in LA gave a **** about what Kiffin was dealing with in terms of sanctions. ****, compared to how often Folden brought it up, you'd have thought USC had gotten a slap on the wrist and had a full team. Kiffin would lose a class of 20 or so upperclassman and have to fill it with a max of 15 freshmen. Every year his roster got smaller, younger and less experienced. He wasn't a very good HC, but he actually dealt with debilitating sanctions and got better results than Folden.

I'm curious to see what he does at his next HC gig, after experiencing failure and getting a chance to learn under Saban. I wouldn't be opposed to Kiffin at Miami, but he wouldn't be choice number one. At this point, anyone is going to be better than Folden. An empty beer can could coach better than him.

Yes to all of this.

Kiffin is the kind of hire we would have made 20 years ago, when we didn't give a **** about anything except trying to win big with a hotshot 'under the radar' coach. Now obviously, Lane has a different level of exposure and notoriety given his employment history compared to guys like JJ, Erickson and Butch, but look... if Nick Saban can find a way to have this guy on his staff, and he obviously recruits at a high level, then he would be better than what we have right now.

I think he's too "toxic" for our current AD and Board of Trustees to seriously consider, but he would be an interesting choice. Guy could sell ice to eskimos, would love to see him get a crack at putting up a fence around South Florida again, instead of opening the gates for one and all like AG has done.
 
Advertisement
Thank you for pointing out their respective ages. I invalidate that argument as Butch did grow and develop from DL, to DC, to HC under a great coach while Kiffin also learned under a great coach and is a good position coach, OC, but has failed as HC at three places. That's just the smudge of a difference. So the age of failing seems like a minute point. But Butch did develop. If only Kiffin had completed the evolution.

That's the point! The guy is STILL young enough to be evolving as an HC.

He's 40 ... The same age Mike Gundy was when he was figuring out how to win at Oklahoma State, but before he became the guy anyone would be interested in hiring at Miami.

When Chip Kelly was 40, he was the OC at New Hampshire!

Kiffin is not a finished product ... And some of the people writing him off today will be the same people griping about why/how Miami "missed" hiring him if he goes someplace else, and blows up.

The same way folks were knocking the gimmicky spread offense Oregon runs, and had to have a "pro-style" HC at Miami.

Now, folks are throwing our Scott Frost and Lincoln Riley as "guys to watch".

Seriously, I don't care if we hire Kiffin. I don't think he would be a bad hire, but I'm saying he's "can't miss", either.

But I'm not accepting that what Butch did 20 years, that he hasn't replicated since, is any more likely to occur than Kiffin coming to Miami and being our next "right coach".

And I'd probably take Dana Holgorsen and Chad Morris, too ...

..... 2 MORE WEEKS UNTIL THE FOOTBALL SEASON STARTS

People are interested in hiring Mike Gundy? After last season?


I would take him. OSU looked great against FSU and then the QB went down and the team kind of circled the drain. I think this year is the rubber year.

My issue with Gundy is that he's at his alma mater with an open checkbook from T Boone and still hasn't had that program take the next step. I think he could definitely have success if he moved to another school in that geographical region or the $EC but I'm not sure he'd be a fit here. That said, his resume prior to last season is pretty solid. I'd just have about 10 guys in college ahead of him on my list of possible replacements for us.
 
great thread. best one on here in months. actually learned.
strong
kelly
Chud
Morris
???

I could get excited for BBB...but I don't see it happening. would be a huge gamble in every sense for the admin. if he came and wrecked shop, big payoff. if he was struggling by y3, ooof.
don't see bot going for it, but I have no problem with butch.
 
Thank you for pointing out their respective ages. I invalidate that argument as Butch did grow and develop from DL, to DC, to HC under a great coach while Kiffin also learned under a great coach and is a good position coach, OC, but has failed as HC at three places. That's just the smudge of a difference. So the age of failing seems like a minute point. But Butch did develop. If only Kiffin had completed the evolution.

That's the point! The guy is STILL young enough to be evolving as an HC.

He's 40 ... The same age Mike Gundy was when he was figuring out how to win at Oklahoma State, but before he became the guy anyone would be interested in hiring at Miami.

When Chip Kelly was 40, he was the OC at New Hampshire!

Kiffin is not a finished product ... And some of the people writing him off today will be the same people griping about why/how Miami "missed" hiring him if he goes someplace else, and blows up.

The same way folks were knocking the gimmicky spread offense Oregon runs, and had to have a "pro-style" HC at Miami.

Now, folks are throwing our Scott Frost and Lincoln Riley as "guys to watch".

Seriously, I don't care if we hire Kiffin. I don't think he would be a bad hire, but I'm saying he's "can't miss", either.

But I'm not accepting that what Butch did 20 years, that he hasn't replicated since, is any more likely to occur than Kiffin coming to Miami and being our next "right coach".

And I'd probably take Dana Holgorsen and Chad Morris, too ...

..... 2 MORE WEEKS UNTIL THE FOOTBALL SEASON STARTS

People are interested in hiring Mike Gundy? After last season?


I would take him. OSU looked great against FSU and then the QB went down and the team kind of circled the drain. I think this year is the rubber year.

My issue with Gundy is that he's at his alma mater with an open checkbook from T Boone and still hasn't had that program take the next step. I think he could definitely have success if he moved to another school in that geographical region or the $EC but I'm not sure he'd be a fit here. That said, his resume prior to last season is pretty solid. I'd just have about 10 guys in college ahead of him on my list of possible replacements for us.

Do you think the reason he hasn't taken that next step is because there's only so much forward progress he can make at OSU ala Jimmy Johnson? I mean he's 84-44 in 10 years there and that's while playing against really good Texas and Oklahoma teams up until 2011 and now very good TCU and Baylor teams and probably getting the 7th best recruits in the conference.

In fairness, he'd probably be my 8th phone call on the list mainly because I think T. Boone would shell out boatloads of money and I don't think Gundy even really wants to leave.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top