- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 3,240
Golden today "Not having Duke Johnson is presenting a great challenge to us" per CaneSport.
No kidding moron, you've had 4 years to bring in talent to replace him but lost them to other schools.
That quote is a bit out of context. Here is more of that exchange, which appears to be a fair answer:
Life after Duke Johnson?
Golden: “I think it’s a great challenge for our guys. Gus Edwards had a really good spring. He’s got to continue to show the responsibility and accountability to be that guy. I think Joe Yearby is also a guy that’s competing for that, although he’s markedly different than Gus. Trayone Gray, Mark Walton and Walter Tucker will also be in that battle come the summer. Again, I’m anxious to see how it plays out. I’m happy with the direction that group is going, but obviously, they have a great challenge and hopefully they have something to prove here over the next four months.”
Staff kind of looked at the season moving forward, knowing you don’t have a weapon like Duke. What have you kind of done throughout the spring to make up for that?
Golden: “We really haven’t changed who we are, philosophically. We’re very excited about Gus and Joe and Trayone Gray is very talented. He’s still learning the position but very talented. Mark Walton is certainly a talented young man coming in. So, we’re going to have the guys there. It may not be just one, it may be more of getting several guys the same amount of touches. But again, if one of those guys separates themselves as Duke did, then he’ll get the majority of the touches. But right now, we’re still in that phase of waiting to see one of them break out. If not, we’ll do it by committee. Either way, we’re fine with it. We’re excited about the direction that group is going.”
Well, there goes this thread and the OP's post.
Lesson to be learned here, you don't need to make up crap to put Al down, he gives you enough ammo as it is.
Still, you can make up quotes and the usual crowd will jump on it rather than make sure what they're talking about is accurate. Bunch of the usual suspects with egg all over their face.
As I guessed, he didn't say anything any other coach in the country wouldn't say. Typical comments, much ado about nothing, regarding a departed player of Duke's calibre. If he had said player x was filling the shoes quite well, we'd have the usuals saying how he's handed the job to player x rather than making them all compete for it.
Damned if you do and damned if you don't.