Does anyone know the current statuts of the Arky State vs. The U litigation?

TpaBayFlyFisher

World Class Angler
Premium
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
5,072
I did a quick search and it seems that there has been little written about this since the suits were filed. Any lawyers know?
 
Advertisement
Yea, they sent me and I presented a nice powerpoint showing them where they can go and **** themselves...
 
The entire state of Arkansas went into a diabetic coma a little while back and forgot about this entire fiasco. Here's to them staying on the Mountain Dew, Pringles, Walmart rotisserie chicken and opioid/methamphetamine diet and never remembering.
 
The entire state of Arkansas went into a diabetic coma a little while back and forgot about this entire fiasco. Here's to them staying on the Mountain Dew, Pringles, Walmart rotisserie chicken and opioid/methamphetamine diet and never remembering.

"You know why they call it a tooth brush..."
 
1. In the Miami state court case, Arkansas State's Motion to Dismiss is set to be heard on September 12, 2018; i.e this Wednesday at 11:00 am.

2. In the Craighead County, Arkansas state court case, there does not presently appear to be a hearing set on or any ruling on UM's Motion to Dismiss.
 
Last edited:
We gave them $45 dollars & they shut the f*ck up about it.
 
1. In the Miami state court case, Arkansas State's Motion to Dismiss is set to be heard on September 12, 2018; i.e this Wednesday at 11:00 am.

2. In the Craighead County, Arkansas state court case, there does not presently appear to be a hearing set on or any ruling on UM's Motion to Dismiss.
September 12. The day a king was born....
 
Advertisement
1. In the Miami state court case, Arkansas State's Motion to Dismiss is set to be heard on September 12, 2018; i.e this Wednesday at 11:00 am.

2. In the Craighead County, Arkansas state court case, there does not presently appear to be a hearing set on or any ruling on UM's Motion to Dismiss.

What a coincidence that this thread appeared........
 
1. In the Miami state court case, Arkansas State's Motion to Dismiss is set to be heard on September 12, 2018; i.e this Wednesday at 11:00 am.

2. In the Craighead County, Arkansas state court case, there does not presently appear to be a hearing set on or any ruling on UM's Motion to Dismiss.

If it’s a motion to dismiss by Arkansas State, then what is it a motion to dismiss for? A counter suit by Miami? Arkansas state would not be entertaining a motion to dismiss its own case.

Or did I read that correctly? To all the lawyers on this site.
 
If it’s a motion to dismiss by Arkansas State, then what is it a motion to dismiss for? A counter suit by Miami? Arkansas state would not be entertaining a motion to dismiss its own case.

Or did I read that correctly? To all the lawyers on this site.


Because the Arky-State hillbillies couldn't keep their mouths shut about how they were gonna sue us on a particular day, Miami was first to file suit in Dade County. Thus, the hillbillies are trying to get our first-to-file case dismissed so that their case in Deliverance-land can proceed.

.
 
If it’s a motion to dismiss by Arkansas State, then what is it a motion to dismiss for? A counter suit by Miami? Arkansas state would not be entertaining a motion to dismiss its own case.

Or did I read that correctly? To all the lawyers on this site.

I did not read the motion but I am sure it is likely a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction/venue. i.e. they want the case heard in Arkansas not Miami.
 
Advertisement
Just read the motion (53 pages with exhibits) and yes all deals with lack of personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and/or improper venue.... Also a firm out of Coral Gables is representing Arky State in the action...
 
If it’s a motion to dismiss by Arkansas State, then what is it a motion to dismiss for? A counter suit by Miami? Arkansas state would not be entertaining a motion to dismiss its own case.

Or did I read that correctly? To all the lawyers on this site.
Probably because there was no choice of venue in the contract. Choice of venue is in what court this case is heard. Arkansas wants to argue it in their state to be on its home turf. Miami could of course move it to federal court. This case would meet the requirements for moving to federal court.
 
Just read the motion (53 pages with exhibits) and yes all deals with lack of personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and/or improper venue.... Also a firm out of Coral Gables is representing Arky State in the action...

Does it mention anything about a forum selection clause or are you aware of any in the original agreement?
 
Back
Top