Dwinstitles
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2011
- Messages
- 47,780
Fuq this staph
.imagine when our roster is mostly those types in three years....yikes
.imagine when our roster is mostly those types in three years....yikes
What kind of moronic logic is that? So because the kid just happened to not fvck up and allow a TD, we should be fine with a 3rd string walk on coming in during crunch time.
If the Pats are down by 6. 2 seconds left at the 40 yard line and the coach decides to take Brady out and put Josh Gordon in at QB and he just happens to throw a TD pass. Does that mean it was a wise decision?
You all are too young to remember Leon Redbone
leon redbone - Yahoo Video Search Results
The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.video.search.yahoo.com
What kind of moronic logic is that? So because the kid just happened to not fvck up and allow a TD, we should be fine with a 3rd string walk on coming in during crunch time.
If the Pats are down by 6. 2 seconds left at the 40 yard line and the coach decides to take Brady out and put Josh Gordon in at QB and he just happens to throw a TD pass. Does that mean it was a wise decision?
Yes.What kind of moronic logic is that? So because the kid just happened to not fvck up and allow a TD, we should be fine with a 3rd string walk on coming in during crunch time.
If the Pats are down by 6. 2 seconds left at the 40 yard line and the coach decides to take Brady out and put Josh Gordon in at QB and he just happens to throw a TD pass. Does that mean it was a wise decision?
What kind of moronic logic is that? So because the kid just happened to not fvck up and allow a TD, we should be fine with a 3rd string walk on coming in during crunch time.
If the Pats are down by 6. 2 seconds left at the 40 yard line and the coach decides to take Brady out and put Josh Gordon in at QB and he just happens to throw a TD pass. Does that mean it was a wise decision?
No need to ask him. The answer is obvious.
We only have two healthy backup LB’s. One is Brooks and the other is McCloud.
Brooks is a MLB and Pink got hurt so Brooks couldn’t replace because he doesn’t play that position. His normal backup McCloud is redshirting so the only available option was the walk on.
He’s played in 3 games at the Striker position. Guys need breathers and maybe he does a good job in practice. Sorry you think our coaches should be checking scholarship statuses on the sideline. If we have 3 strikers all of them will get on the field. If the coaches think he can get the job done fine. In three games we have no reason to think he can’t. Sorry you’re running out of things to complain about. You’ll have a new Saturday soon
Ideally they should be checking scholarship statuses in the offseason so they don't need to play walk-ons in games.
So that leaves the option of throwing a 3-star true freshman into the game.
Or recruit better so those aren't the two options.
Ideally they should be checking scholarship statuses in the offseason so they don't need to play walk-ons in games.
I was going by your words, which were really just a cute jab at the staff. Rational people know that you can't fix a position weakness in one offseason.