- Joined
- Jan 12, 2014
- Messages
- 53,224
What's the difference, seriously?
"Isn't as good" means he's good or ok but not at the high level people are claiming he's at. "Isn't that good" means he kinda sucks.
Ok, kudos.
But I said "isn't THAT good"
So what's the difference now?
Lol. Dude, why are you getting so mad over this? I'm glad that Richt is the leader but Richt's play calling and adjustments have not been a winner this year and Louisville is tearing it up.
We are doing far less with equal talent to last year on offense. If Richt had his type of players I'm sure that the execution of his system would be better but I am still troubled by his inability to asjust, in the interim, to the skill levels of the personnel he has to work with. Doesn't it trouble you that Coley's check with me offense produced far better results with virtually the same personnel???
Lmao. I'm not mad. I just type angry/assholeish. I never ever get emotional about texts.
I'm not going to lie. The entire RPO offense troubles me. I still don't know why, for the life of me, Richt isn't running his shallow cross concepts that made him bank over his career.
Why adapt the RPO with this team?
I think he has out thought himself but I don't think he should give up playcalling. I need to see one more year before I see that. Richt has earned that much from me; especially seeing that he has shown he we will change and try new things.
My biggest qualm is with Searels, tbh.
I don't like his track record and I don't like his technique.
The offense looks worse because the lineman have totally regressed.
They weren't good last year, I know. But to already give up just as many sacks as the year before only 7 games in to the new season after being in the best shape of your life just SCREAMS bad technique/ coaching.
I agree mostly. I'm perplexed at us not running the slanting underneath stuff. I'm also hugely disappointed in our O Line play and Searles certainly hasn't elevated that group to even mediocre.