Think this proves how outdated evaluating offense is by total offense numbers, though.You haven't provided anything here that supports your opinion.
You can have a top 60 offense and still have a QB that completes 51% of their passes..
Getting all worked up because his results matched his talent at garbage school.... that’s ridiculous. And even more typical of this board.This is ridiculous and typical of this board.
He had middling results with middling talent...period.
Hope he's learned enough to really light it up.
I see this and f-ing want to throw up...We were in the 110s, top 60 is a massive improvement over that and would have easily netted at LEAST 3 wins. Don’t forget Miami loss 3 games by 1 possession scores or less. No motions, predictability in playcalling, no scheming players to get open. Jeff Thomas having only 1 catch in 4 games. All of that sh*t adds up
View attachment 83151
Agreed. Any new coach is going to have a large element of unknown, and shouldn't be looked at as a savior until he's proven himself with that new team. At the same time, just looking at past numbers doesn't provide enough reason to be worried and negative about it either. There must be some reason that Enos was valued by Saban and by some accounts left Saban quite upset when he decided to come to UM instead of sticking around for the OC job at Bama.I think people are going too far on both ends of the spectrum. There is nothing wrong with being optimistic that Enos will put up better numbers now that the level of talent has gone up for him. However, it is also fine to look at those numbers and say "I'm goin to take a wait and see approach."
It also helps that our defense feasts on some of the worst offenses in the nation here in the Coastal and it seems like every time we step up against equal talent...his defense gets handed to him
So what you're saying is the defense is more successful against bad teams than good ones?
Please name one defense that was as good against their best opponents as it was against their worst. I saw Clemson light up Alabama's defense. I saw Ohio State light up Michigan's defense. Go down the list of the top 25 defenses in the nation and find me one that shut down every team they played.
Only two teams gained more than 400 yards of offense against Miami last year. One was Boston College where they admittedly got beat down and run over. The other was Wisconsin who managed 402 yards.
Besides, my point was that before he got hired at Miami, Diaz had a lot of mixed results at previous stops. There were quite a few members here who were rightfully questioning the hire when it was announced. He's been an unquestioned success here while continuing to fine tune and adjust his defense into one of the nation's best.
Tee3000 makes a valid point. There is nothing in the statistics of any Enos coached offense that should provide comfort or confidence that we will put up lofty numbers. However, that does not mean we cannot be reasonably optimistic that Enos will have success at Miami. I for one am cautiously optimistic. Why?
It also helps that our defense feasts on some of the worst offenses in the nation here in the Coastal and it seems like every time we step up against equal talent...his defense gets handed to him
Getting all worked up because his results matched his talent at garbage school.... that’s ridiculous. And even more typical of this board.
My point exactlyI don't know WTF you're talking about...my point remains........go down the list of the top 25 defenses and see how many top 50 offenses they played vs how many played.
Thank you
That's not true.
His time at CMU is concerning.
His Arkansas offenses either outperformed where one would expect or performed right at where one would expect. They were never "disappointing" though. If Enos is able to come to Miami and perform on offense where the recruiting class rankings say he should be at relative to the talent we play, you can just pencil us into the ACCCG every single year with a chance to make the playoffs with a win.
The biggest concern with Enos isn't really his history of success per se, which is more than good enough at the P5 level.
But instead: can it work here at Miami? I think a lot of people are pointing to the Alabama offense and hoping he brings more of that because it lends itself more to continual success here compared to what he ran at Arkansas. But the jury is still out on that.
If Enos wants to go under center, run a huge playbook, and rely on an OL that just whips the man in front of them, I think there is a ceiling on the offense when looked at over a lot of years time.
My point exactly
I don’t think anyone was offended by what I said. For some reason you were, tho. Why?Here we go..you just called people on this board idiots but now I'm getting all worked up right?
You are a CLOWN.
You're just staying stupid **** and doubling down with even dumber ****.
I really believe he has evolved as coach...working under Sabin seems to have a positive mental effect...I hope he uses the bag game here that he learned at Bama....
That's not true.
His time at CMU is concerning.
His Arkansas offenses either outperformed where one would expect or performed right at where one would expect. They were never "disappointing" though. If Enos is able to come to Miami and perform on offense where the recruiting class rankings say he should be at relative to the talent we play, you can just pencil us into the ACCCG every single year with a chance to make the playoffs with a win.
The biggest concern with Enos isn't really his history of success per se, which is more than good enough at the P5 level.
But instead: can it work here at Miami? I think a lot of people are pointing to the Alabama offense and hoping he brings more of that because it lends itself more to continual success here compared to what he ran at Arkansas. But the jury is still out on that.
If Enos wants to go under center, run a huge playbook, and rely on an OL that just whips the man in front of them, I think there is a ceiling on the offense when looked at over a lot of years time.