forums

MEGA Conference Realignment and lawsuits Megathread: Stories, Tales, Lies, and Exaggerations

Hurracanes said:
Canesrule230 said:
Maybe you've already said this before but do you think we're a package deal with the noles?
Click to expand...
I think so. Miami to Big X more of a sure thing than FSU, though. FSU has embarrassed themselves with their execution to leave ACC. But $ talks and BS walks.
Click to expand...
So FSU is staying in ACC then because they are broke and always fill of bs?

Not sure why everyone thinks we need the rivalry with FSU? It’s working pretty awesome this last couple of years in recruiting and transfers.
 
rascon said:
So FSU is staying in ACC then because they are broke and always fill of bs?

Not sure why everyone thinks we need the rivalry with FSU? It’s working pretty awesome this last couple of years in recruiting and transfers.
Click to expand...
Nobody worth a **** is staying in the ACC. You don’t file a lawsuit and risk all that to not leave the ACC sooner than later.
 
5NC4 said:
Flugaur is long winded and hand to listen to……but this is directly related to Miami

Click to expand...

Boy, kind of a tough listen because guy takes 3 business days in between sentences, so I had to take break about quarter of the way through to let my frustration subside a bit. Going back in about 10 minutes to try to get through some more of the video
 
Canesrule230 said:
Got the cliff notes? Flugaur is plugged in but my Lord does he take forever to get to the point. May have to get chatgpt to summarize this
Click to expand...

a) No assurances have been made to Echevarria from his sources, but obviously may have have been made because of Echevarria’s comments.
b) Michigan and Penn State want Miami in
c) Flugaur does have Miami (Duke as well) on his “quick strike” list from one of his previous YouTube videos.
d) Miami and Duke are private universities with nothing holding them back. Both are big time research universities and AAU as well.
e) Miami is a brand on the rise with TV ratings and Duke big time basketball.
f) The passage of the bill could result in the quick strike, but is this bill retroactive and will it force Miami and others to stay in their current conferences
g) Something changed 2 weeks ago
h) The university gave Joe Rose the questions ahead of time for the Echevarria interview
i) Miami knows they will not getting a full share
j) Bezos is in contact with Echevarria…something to do with streaming giants
k) University about to have a new apparel deal

All I got this far
 
5NC4 said:
a) No assurances have been made to Echevarria from his sources, but obviously may have have been made because of Echevarria’s comments.
b) Michigan and Penn State want Miami in
c) Flugaur does have Miami (Duke as well) on his “quick strike” list from one of his previous YouTube videos.
d) Miami and Duke are private universities with nothing holding them back. Both are big time research universities and AAU as well.
e) Miami is a brand on the rise with TV ratings and Duke big time basketball.
f) The passage of the bill could result in the quick strike, but is this bill retroactive and will it force Miami and others to stay in their current conferences
g) Something changed 2 weeks ago
h) The university gave Joe Rose the questions ahead of time for the Echevarria interview
i) Miami knows they will not getting a full share
j) Bezos is in contact with Echevarria…something to do with streaming giants
k) University about to have a new apparel deal

All I got this far
Click to expand...
Thank you for doing the heavy lifting of listening sir
 
Hurracanes said:
Nobody worth a **** is staying in the ACC. You don’t file a lawsuit and risk all that to not leave the ACC sooner than later.
Click to expand...
I imagine it's one of the reasons they didn't fire Norvell. They very well may have said To leave and fire him costs $220M... Waiting a year to do both costs $160M (this upcoming yr)... Waiting another yr would cost like $130M... Type thing

Just making up numbers mostly I don't remember his buyouts
 
5NC4 said:
a) No assurances have been made to Echevarria from his sources, but obviously may have have been made because of Echevarria’s comments.
b) Michigan and Penn State want Miami in
c) Flugaur does have Miami (Duke as well) on his “quick strike” list from one of his previous YouTube videos.
d) Miami and Duke are private universities with nothing holding them back. Both are big time research universities and AAU as well.
e) Miami is a brand on the rise with TV ratings and Duke big time basketball.
f) The passage of the bill could result in the quick strike, but is this bill retroactive and will it force Miami and others to stay in their current conferences
g) Something changed 2 weeks ago
h) The university gave Joe Rose the questions ahead of time for the Echevarria interview
i) Miami knows they will not getting a full share
j) Bezos is in contact with Echevarria…something to do with streaming giants
k) University about to have a new apparel deal

All I got this far
Click to expand...
We boutta go independent and be on Amazon and have our Hard Knocks show every summer and have scheduling agreement along with ND with the B1G? Lol
 
5NC4 said:
a) No assurances have been made to Echevarria from his sources, but obviously may have have been made because of Echevarria’s comments.
b) Michigan and Penn State want Miami in
c) Flugaur does have Miami (Duke as well) on his “quick strike” list from one of his previous YouTube videos.
d) Miami and Duke are private universities with nothing holding them back. Both are big time research universities and AAU as well.
e) Miami is a brand on the rise with TV ratings and Duke big time basketball.
f) The passage of the bill could result in the quick strike, but is this bill retroactive and will it force Miami and others to stay in their current conferences
g) Something changed 2 weeks ago
h) The university gave Joe Rose the questions ahead of time for the Echevarria interview
i) Miami knows they will not getting a full share
j) Bezos is in contact with Echevarria…something to do with streaming giants
k) University about to have a new apparel deal

All I got this far
Click to expand...
👀

That bill is such horse **** and no way it holds water long term. ***** about to get ugly.
 
Canesrule230 said:
Thank you for doing the heavy lifting of listening sir
Click to expand...
You guys know after a couple hours on YouTube you can get an ai summary or you can drop a link into several ai sites of the YouTube video and get a fuller summary like notegpt:

#

### Highlights
- 🏈 University of Miami's football president drops a bombshell about playing for *next* contracts, stirring realignment rumors.
- 🔔 Social media blitz by Miami coordinated to send signals—did they get Big 10 assurances or not? No one knows for sure!
- ⚖️ The Protecting College Sports Act threatens to freeze all realignment moves but may unintentionally trigger a “nuclear option.”
- 🐅 Clemson Tigers 2026 spotlight: Backup QB drama, running back readiness, and defensive stars to watch.
- 💰 Big 10 network’s media rights battles: private $$$ clashing with government legislation.
- 🕵️ Insider talk about schools signing NDAs; the real game is behind closed doors.
- 🤯 The college football landscape is a mix of politics, media power plays, and passionate fan tribalism—all wrapped in confusion and excitement.

### Key Insights
- 💼 **Miami’s "Next Contract" Comment is a Signal, Not a Guarantee:** When the University of Miami president said they’re "playing for the next contract," it’s like a Vegas poker tell—he’s not revealing the whole hand but trying to psych out opponents and rally supporters simultaneously. Realistically, Miami hasn’t received formal assurances but confidence in their candidacy is oddly high. Allegedly, Penn State is backing them as a sponsor inside the Big 10, which adds some serious clout behind the scenes.

- 🎭 **The Real Audience Isn’t the Big 10 or SEC:** Greg theorizes that Miami’s message wasn’t directed at the Big 10 or SEC—they already know where things stand. Instead, the president is sending a message to internal stakeholders, boosters, and the regional fanbase to manage expectations and build momentum. In PR wars, this kind of leak is surgical.

- 🧨 **Protecting College Sports Act: A Bill That Could Backfire Spectacularly:** The bill aims to freeze conference expansion to “save” college football, but it might just accelerate a breakaway move by the SEC or Big 10—the “nuclear option.” The act threatens private market freedoms and could lead to government micromanagement of everything from media rights to scheduling. It’s like trying to put a lid on a boiling pot with duct tape; the stew might just explode.

- 🤖 **Media Rights Mega-Deals = The New Frontline of College Football Warfare:** The money wars are intense, with Big 10 network making mountains of cash and big streaming platforms (Amazon, Netflix) circling like sharks. Politicians want to “regulate” to redistribute the cash but risk erasing innovation and private investment that have fueled the sport’s growth. The real battle is for control, not just who wins on Saturdays.

- 🔎 **Clemson’s 2026 Season: Talent vs. Uncertainty:** Despite some roster concerns, Clemson has star power in Will Helt (defense), Sammy Brown (linebacker), and returning wide receivers. The QB is a known wildcard, and the running back room is a “show me” situation. LSU vs. Clemson to kick the season? Buckle your helmets. Clemson could shine or stumble—it’s a classic tale of talent and coaching chemistry.

- 🕵️‍♂️ **Realignment Is a High-Stakes, Cloak-and-Dagger Operation:** NDAs, coordination with media interviews, and controlled social media drops show this is less about public knowledge and more about strategic signaling. Schools play poker with the national audience, while quietly negotiating with Big 10 and SEC under the radar. The old saying “discretion is the better part of valor” has never been more true.

- 🧢 **Fan Tribalism and Media Narratives Shape Perception More Than Facts:** From furious Alabama fans to casual followers who watch for commercials only, the landscape is fragmented. Tribal allegiances lead to narratives that can overshadow the intricate business dealings behind the scenes. This can create bizarre situations where everybody is "angry" but very few understand the mechanics behind the scenes—classic sports soap opera stuff!

### Keywords
- University of Miami
- Big 10 Expansion
- Protecting College Sports Act
- Conference Realignment
- Clemson Tigers 2026
- Media Rights
- College Football Politics
 
Ispyin said:
You guys know after a couple hours on YouTube you can get an ai summary or you can drop a link into several ai sites of the YouTube video and get a fuller summary like notegpt:

#

### Highlights
- 🏈 University of Miami's football president drops a bombshell about playing for *next* contracts, stirring realignment rumors.
- 🔔 Social media blitz by Miami coordinated to send signals—did they get Big 10 assurances or not? No one knows for sure!
- ⚖️ The Protecting College Sports Act threatens to freeze all realignment moves but may unintentionally trigger a “nuclear option.”
- 🐅 Clemson Tigers 2026 spotlight: Backup QB drama, running back readiness, and defensive stars to watch.
- 💰 Big 10 network’s media rights battles: private $$$ clashing with government legislation.
- 🕵️ Insider talk about schools signing NDAs; the real game is behind closed doors.
- 🤯 The college football landscape is a mix of politics, media power plays, and passionate fan tribalism—all wrapped in confusion and excitement.

### Key Insights
- 💼 **Miami’s "Next Contract" Comment is a Signal, Not a Guarantee:** When the University of Miami president said they’re "playing for the next contract," it’s like a Vegas poker tell—he’s not revealing the whole hand but trying to psych out opponents and rally supporters simultaneously. Realistically, Miami hasn’t received formal assurances but confidence in their candidacy is oddly high. Allegedly, Penn State is backing them as a sponsor inside the Big 10, which adds some serious clout behind the scenes.

- 🎭 **The Real Audience Isn’t the Big 10 or SEC:** Greg theorizes that Miami’s message wasn’t directed at the Big 10 or SEC—they already know where things stand. Instead, the president is sending a message to internal stakeholders, boosters, and the regional fanbase to manage expectations and build momentum. In PR wars, this kind of leak is surgical.

- 🧨 **Protecting College Sports Act: A Bill That Could Backfire Spectacularly:** The bill aims to freeze conference expansion to “save” college football, but it might just accelerate a breakaway move by the SEC or Big 10—the “nuclear option.” The act threatens private market freedoms and could lead to government micromanagement of everything from media rights to scheduling. It’s like trying to put a lid on a boiling pot with duct tape; the stew might just explode.

- 🤖 **Media Rights Mega-Deals = The New Frontline of College Football Warfare:** The money wars are intense, with Big 10 network making mountains of cash and big streaming platforms (Amazon, Netflix) circling like sharks. Politicians want to “regulate” to redistribute the cash but risk erasing innovation and private investment that have fueled the sport’s growth. The real battle is for control, not just who wins on Saturdays.

- 🔎 **Clemson’s 2026 Season: Talent vs. Uncertainty:** Despite some roster concerns, Clemson has star power in Will Helt (defense), Sammy Brown (linebacker), and returning wide receivers. The QB is a known wildcard, and the running back room is a “show me” situation. LSU vs. Clemson to kick the season? Buckle your helmets. Clemson could shine or stumble—it’s a classic tale of talent and coaching chemistry.

- 🕵️‍♂️ **Realignment Is a High-Stakes, Cloak-and-Dagger Operation:** NDAs, coordination with media interviews, and controlled social media drops show this is less about public knowledge and more about strategic signaling. Schools play poker with the national audience, while quietly negotiating with Big 10 and SEC under the radar. The old saying “discretion is the better part of valor” has never been more true.

- 🧢 **Fan Tribalism and Media Narratives Shape Perception More Than Facts:** From furious Alabama fans to casual followers who watch for commercials only, the landscape is fragmented. Tribal allegiances lead to narratives that can overshadow the intricate business dealings behind the scenes. This can create bizarre situations where everybody is "angry" but very few understand the mechanics behind the scenes—classic sports soap opera stuff!

### Keywords
- University of Miami
- Big 10 Expansion
- Protecting College Sports Act
- Conference Realignment
- Clemson Tigers 2026
- Media Rights
- College Football Politics
Click to expand...
Thanks
 
IMG_8524.jpeg

The fact that the university itself has been posting this across its social media accounts is something to keep an eye on. People are being cautious for good reason, but I also think that a lot of talking heads are underestimating the B10’s interest in us.

At this point in time, for CFB, Miami is the biggest prize in realignment. FSU is a ruin, Clemson is on the downtrend. UNC and Duke are massive CBB adds, but no one is under the impression that they’ll be year to year football contenders.
 
Ispyin said:
You guys know after a couple hours on YouTube you can get an ai summary or you can drop a link into several ai sites of the YouTube video and get a fuller summary like notegpt:

#

### Highlights
- 🏈 University of Miami's football president drops a bombshell about playing for *next* contracts, stirring realignment rumors.
- 🔔 Social media blitz by Miami coordinated to send signals—did they get Big 10 assurances or not? No one knows for sure!
- ⚖️ The Protecting College Sports Act threatens to freeze all realignment moves but may unintentionally trigger a “nuclear option.”
- 🐅 Clemson Tigers 2026 spotlight: Backup QB drama, running back readiness, and defensive stars to watch.
- 💰 Big 10 network’s media rights battles: private $$$ clashing with government legislation.
- 🕵️ Insider talk about schools signing NDAs; the real game is behind closed doors.
- 🤯 The college football landscape is a mix of politics, media power plays, and passionate fan tribalism—all wrapped in confusion and excitement.

### Key Insights
- 💼 **Miami’s "Next Contract" Comment is a Signal, Not a Guarantee:** When the University of Miami president said they’re "playing for the next contract," it’s like a Vegas poker tell—he’s not revealing the whole hand but trying to psych out opponents and rally supporters simultaneously. Realistically, Miami hasn’t received formal assurances but confidence in their candidacy is oddly high. Allegedly, Penn State is backing them as a sponsor inside the Big 10, which adds some serious clout behind the scenes.

- 🎭 **The Real Audience Isn’t the Big 10 or SEC:** Greg theorizes that Miami’s message wasn’t directed at the Big 10 or SEC—they already know where things stand. Instead, the president is sending a message to internal stakeholders, boosters, and the regional fanbase to manage expectations and build momentum. In PR wars, this kind of leak is surgical.

- 🧨 **Protecting College Sports Act: A Bill That Could Backfire Spectacularly:** The bill aims to freeze conference expansion to “save” college football, but it might just accelerate a breakaway move by the SEC or Big 10—the “nuclear option.” The act threatens private market freedoms and could lead to government micromanagement of everything from media rights to scheduling. It’s like trying to put a lid on a boiling pot with duct tape; the stew might just explode.

- 🤖 **Media Rights Mega-Deals = The New Frontline of College Football Warfare:** The money wars are intense, with Big 10 network making mountains of cash and big streaming platforms (Amazon, Netflix) circling like sharks. Politicians want to “regulate” to redistribute the cash but risk erasing innovation and private investment that have fueled the sport’s growth. The real battle is for control, not just who wins on Saturdays.

- 🔎 **Clemson’s 2026 Season: Talent vs. Uncertainty:** Despite some roster concerns, Clemson has star power in Will Helt (defense), Sammy Brown (linebacker), and returning wide receivers. The QB is a known wildcard, and the running back room is a “show me” situation. LSU vs. Clemson to kick the season? Buckle your helmets. Clemson could shine or stumble—it’s a classic tale of talent and coaching chemistry.

- 🕵️‍♂️ **Realignment Is a High-Stakes, Cloak-and-Dagger Operation:** NDAs, coordination with media interviews, and controlled social media drops show this is less about public knowledge and more about strategic signaling. Schools play poker with the national audience, while quietly negotiating with Big 10 and SEC under the radar. The old saying “discretion is the better part of valor” has never been more true.

- 🧢 **Fan Tribalism and Media Narratives Shape Perception More Than Facts:** From furious Alabama fans to casual followers who watch for commercials only, the landscape is fragmented. Tribal allegiances lead to narratives that can overshadow the intricate business dealings behind the scenes. This can create bizarre situations where everybody is "angry" but very few understand the mechanics behind the scenes—classic sports soap opera stuff!

### Keywords
- University of Miami
- Big 10 Expansion
- Protecting College Sports Act
- Conference Realignment
- Clemson Tigers 2026
- Media Rights
- College Football Politics
Click to expand...
****, even the Flugaur's AI summary is long winded.
 
Hold My Beer said:
If so, wouldn't it make sense for both ESPN and the SEC to want the Canes?

Why would entities all about making money pass on something so valuable?
Click to expand...
ESPN yes.

SEC is stubborn and thinks they're above letting others dictate terms.

They'll be making a strategic mistake if they let both FSU and Miami go to the B1G without a fight (a fight would be good for us). With Florida, especially the big cities, being so transient, the state is up for grabs when it comes to conference loyalty. Miami and FSU leaving would effectively be giving the B1G a greater foothold in Florida than the SEC.
 
Back
Top