forums

MEGA Conference Realignment and lawsuits Megathread(Its still personal)

Rellyrell said:
Can u provide the platform or site where that 5th point u listed is found at? I’ve literally seen the CPF committee’s statement found here:


& a SI article found here:


that does not state that criteria. In fact, no where have I seen that bolded bullet point 5 that you included.

So if u can you show us where u obtained that info, that would be great.
Click to expand...
It's in the principles section of the first website.
 
Advertisement
FSU has ****ed and moaned about the ACC and rattled their saber about leaving, then got snubbed for the CFP and has been vocal about it. At what point do the Big 10 and SEC see that and start thinking they might be a bit too high maintenance?
 
CaneinBroward said:
Nothing says completely wrong like name-calling. Now go back to Warchant for the weekly circle jerk. 🤣 🤣 🤣


Mad Kicking And Screaming GIF by MOODMAN
Tantrum Crying GIF
Click to expand...


Hilarious.

You don't deny that you misread the CFP criteria and that you misunderstand the CFP Committee voting process that they just went through. You just deflect because I called you and your post stupid.

WAAAAAAHHH.

Look, little snowflake, if you had any testicular fortitude, you'd try to counter with facts or logic. But because you have none, you won't.
 
every ACC team should be Looking to leave. There’s no way in **** a team going 13-0 conference champion should not make it. That’s a slap in the face to the conference and its perception no matter how many ACC teams **** on the SEC.

The Acc is dead and also **** the refs
 
Advertisement
Dear God.

Genetics has now stolen his posting style from Gaby.

I also like how he belatedly addresses the SEC points I've raised (and which he has clearly read). He doesn't know **** about the SEC, it's intentions, or the intentions of F$U/Clemson towards the SEC, but he knows Big 10 people who talk to the SEC people, so all is good.

Whatever. Maybe F$U will end up in the Big 10. But if all things were equal and they had the same timeline and monetary assistance from the SEC, it wouldn't even be a close call.

The SEC is the most fascinating part of this, because their past expansion efforts have been both stealthy and rapid.

So we shall see. I actually think that it is quite possible for F$U to misplay its hand (yet again) by ending up in the Big 10 due to its impatience and petulance.
 
It’s in some ways a game of Chicken. The SEC does not want FSU and Miami in the Big 10 and the Big 10 knows this may be the last way to capture Florida and get Notre Dame to move. Nobody blinks until the contractual issues are on the table for revision and that is the mountain that needs to be climbed. Delay is to our advantage. A top 10 Miami in the playoffs and on the move is worth many multiples more than a 7-5 Miami in the Pinstripe. Finish recruiting and the portal strong and get in the playoffs. Hope nothing happens for a year or so.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
Dear God.

Genetics has now stolen his posting style from Gaby.

I also like how he belatedly addresses the SEC points I've raised (and which he has clearly read). He doesn't know **** about the SEC, it's intentions, or the intentions of F$U/Clemson towards the SEC, but he knows Big 10 people who talk to the SEC people, so all is good.

Whatever. Maybe F$U will end up in the Big 10. But if all things were equal and they had the same timeline and monetary assistance from the SEC, it wouldn't even be a close call.

The SEC is the most fascinating part of this, because their past expansion efforts have been both stealthy and rapid.

So we shall see. I actually think that it is quite possible for F$U to misplay its hand (yet again) by ending up in the Big 10 due to its impatience and petulance.
Click to expand...
..bless your heart
 
Rellyrell said:
Can u provide the platform or site where that 5th point u listed is found at? I’ve literally seen the CPF committee’s statement found here:


& a SI article found here:


that does not state that criteria. In fact, no where have I seen that bolded bullet point 5 that you included.

So if u can you show us where u obtained that info, that would be great.
Click to expand...
It's on the playoff's website. It's titled "CFP Selection Committee Protocol" and states it was adopted back on 6/20/12.

https://collegefootballplayoff.com/sports/2016/10/24/selection-committee-protocol

On the right hand side of the page it gives a listing of descriptions of the selection process. If you click "1. Mission", it states the mission is to select the best teams, not most deserving.

Under "2. Principles", it lists what will be considered when selecting teams, this includes unavailability of key players and coaches.
 
Advertisement
canesmang1 said:
every ACC team should be Looking to leave. There’s no way in **** a team going 13-0 conference champion should not make it. That’s a slap in the face to the conference and its perception no matter how many ACC teams **** on the SEC.

The Acc is dead and also **** the refs
Click to expand...
Here We Go Again GIF
 
Advertisement
CaneinBroward said:
It's on the playoff's website. It's titled "CFP Selection Committee Protocol" and states it was adopted back on 6/20/12.

https://collegefootballplayoff.com/sports/2016/10/24/selection-committee-protocol

On the right hand side of the page it gives a listing of descriptions of the selection process. If you click "1. Mission", it states the mission is to select the best teams, not most deserving.

Under "2. Principles", it lists what will be considered when selecting teams, this includes unavailability of key players and coaches.
Click to expand...


Again, you have chosen to ignore THEIR OWN WORDS and THEIR OWN ACTIONS in creating pools of "otherwise comparable teams".

They do not rank all 25 teams at once. They create groups of teams, and then apply the criteria to each group in turn.

The first tier that the CFP Committee evaluated this year was Michigan/Washington/Texas. They even said so. Once they had THOSE THREE TEAMS, they applied the criteria to rank Michigan 1, Washington 2, and Texas 3.

The second tier was F$U-Alabama. They even said so.

And those tiers were WRONG on their face. Just WRONG. The CFP Committee confessed to putting a 1-loss team (that had the WORST loss in the Top 7, to a 2-loss Oklahoma team ranked #12) on the same level as undefeated Michigan and Washington. That is just wrong. Michigan, Washington, and TEXAS are not "otherwise comparable teams".

You can't look at the evidence and criteria selectively, and cherrypick only the bits that you want to consider to reach your predetermined outcome.
 
Advertisement
Gi0logy said:
It’s official. Genetics is hands down, the biggest joke. He’s now resorting to posting 15k word essays without actually saying anything of substance.

How embarrassing is this guy?
Click to expand...
Flanderization in action but in real life.
 
CaneinBroward said:
It's on the playoff's website. It's titled "CFP Selection Committee Protocol" and states it was adopted back on 6/20/12.

https://collegefootballplayoff.com/sports/2016/10/24/selection-committee-protocol

On the right hand side of the page it gives a listing of descriptions of the selection process. If you click "1. Mission", it states the mission is to select the best teams, not most deserving.

Under "2. Principles", it lists what will be considered when selecting teams, this includes unavailability of key players and coaches.
Click to expand...

Didn’t click the principals drop down list. Thank u for that.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
Dear God.

Genetics has now stolen his posting style from Gaby.

I also like how he belatedly addresses the SEC points I've raised (and which he has clearly read). He doesn't know **** about the SEC, it's intentions, or the intentions of F$U/Clemson towards the SEC, but he knows Big 10 people who talk to the SEC people, so all is good.

Whatever. Maybe F$U will end up in the Big 10. But if all things were equal and they had the same timeline and monetary assistance from the SEC, it wouldn't even be a close call.

The SEC is the most fascinating part of this, because their past expansion efforts have been both stealthy and rapid.

So we shall see. I actually think that it is quite possible for F$U to misplay its hand (yet again) by ending up in the Big 10 due to its impatience and petulance.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't it be more lucking into their own impatience to end up in the B1G as the better overall conference of the Power 2 across academics and athletics?
 
Advertisement
Back
Top