forums

MEGA Conference Realignment and lawsuits Megathread(Its still personal)

Advertisement
Bigdaddycane44 said:
I don’t. I think they’re flirting with the BIG to make the SEC jealous. They want to be in the SEC and the SEC wants them. I’d be shocked if they weren’t the next two programs taken by the SEC.
Click to expand...
They both want the Big Ten and not the SEC.
 
DualThreat said:
Y’all are delusional talking about Miami’s “brand.” We have been completely irrelevant for 20 years (aside from our 2017 campaign where we ended up losing 3 games). We were a dominant force 40 years ago. Yale was pretty nasty in the early 1900s. They going SEC too? As much as it hurts me to say it, college football is a big money business and results matter. We gonna bring our Champs Sports Bowl trophy from 2016 to our meeting with Fox?

I’m trying to remain optimistic that our leadership can find a way to keep the program afloat but our collective decision making has been so bad and spanned across many different ADs and sports.
Click to expand...
Your mistake is thinking the team’s record is the same thing as its brand. The conferences want to expand for television markets plain and simple. They want television markets and they want to prevent their competition from gaining a foothold in those markets too. There’s a reason the Big 10 took USC and UCLA. Because Fox wants the WHOLE Southern California market. UCLA hasn’t done anything worthwhile in football since the 90’s. Doesn’t matter. ESPN now has no teams in the nation’s largest TV market.
 
Cajuncane said:
Mario needs to worry about recruiting and getting the team better so he can recruit better….this is Rads job not Mario’s.
Click to expand...
tenor.gif
 
Advertisement
FL Cane said:
Don’t tell the mopes that. Everything’s always bad all the time. Remember, the golden rule with them is that they want us to suck. They need something in their lives that’s more miserable than they are .
Click to expand...
You’re not wrong but @JayCane20 has been pretty reliable in the past. Are you saying that nothing in his post has you concerned in any way?
 
Advertisement
FL Cane said:
Don’t tell the mopes that. Everything’s always bad all the time. Remember, the golden rule with them is that they want us to suck. They need something in their lives that’s more miserable than they are .
Click to expand...
Everything has been bad every time……..I kid
 
DTP said:
Your mistake is thinking the team’s record is the same thing as its brand. The conferences want to expand for television markets plain and simple. They want television markets and they want to prevent their competition from gaining a foothold in those markets too. There’s a reason the Big 10 took USC and UCLA. Because Fox wants the WHOLE Southern California market. UCLA hasn’t done anything worthwhile in football since the 90’s. Doesn’t matter. ESPN now has no teams in the nation’s largest TV market.
Click to expand...
Right, and while we haven’t been competing for Championships over the last 15-20 years, we’ve still had a lot of great players come through here and get drafted. That’s important and we’re right up there with FSU, Clemson and other top programs in that regard. Numerous recent pro-bowl caliber NFL players who were part of Golden/Richt’s teams between 2011-2018. Denzel, Oliver Vernon, Brandon Linder, etc. And dudes like Jimmy G and Sam Shields from the Randy era. Someone else shared a statistic showing we have a top 25 overall win percentage over the last 10 years. Again, not what we strive to be, but it’s not as bad as some people think, and certainly better than terrible programs like Rutgers, Purdue, UCLA, Vanderbilt, and a whole lot of other bad programs currently occupying the SEC/BIG.

But you’re right, it’s more about the brand. I also don’t think we’ve been as bad or irrelevant as some fans think. The majority of the current BIG has been worse in the same timeframe. Up until 2021, all they had was Ohio State. Michigan was garbage until Harbaugh took over, and it took him 6 years to finally beat the Buckeys.
 
Advertisement
Empirical Cane said:
I believe Stanford won't be sad if they drop in level or close up the team alltogether.
Click to expand...
They won't shut down football. People act like Stanford is Vanderbilt. They've been a Pac-12 top program for the better part of a decade. Yeah they've slipped a little bit in recent years, but they've had some players come through there and their players have had success in the NFL.
 
Dude said:
The Big East used to be considered a power conference (albeit a weaker one) before Miami & VT ripped its heart out. We started this.
Click to expand...
But Texas A&M ended the idea of regionality. aTm is not in the South East. Miami and Virginia Tech are in Atlantic states. Big 10 said, OK…
 
Advertisement
Alex Del Piero said:
And I don’t think SEC will simply just watch B1G become the most prominent conference in all CFB.
Click to expand...
I hope not ... Sankey in his comment today didn't sound like they were interested in expansion ... but some of that is legalese to to a point "not actively recruiting" to avoid potential litigation perhaps.
 
Gsugradcanefan said:
They won't shut down football. People act like Stanford is Vanderbilt. They've been a Pac-12 top program for the better part of a decade. Yeah they've slipped a little bit in recent years, but they've had some players come through there and their players have had success in the NFL.
Click to expand...
Friend, I stand by my comment. Stanford cares as much about athletics as Harvard does.
 
Gsugradcanefan said:
They won't shut down football. People act like Stanford is Vanderbilt. They've been a Pac-12 top program for the better part of a decade. Yeah they've slipped a little bit in recent years, but they've had some players come through there and their players have had success in the NFL.
Click to expand...

John Elway went to Stanford. Greatest quarterback of all time IMO, so that's saying something
 
Advertisement
Back
Top