DerekDohrman
Senior
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
- Messages
- 2,772
and LOL at saying it was a bad call because the field was wet. that variable is actually in our favor. a wet, bouncing football is much more difficult to hold onto. if anything, that made the call better not worse
Except that the ball hardly bounced. The water softens the turf, play some golf, so the ball didn't carry to Berrios. If the turf is dry, the ball gets to Berrios and is either Miami's or GT's at that spot. A wet ball is in our favor if he linedrive kicks it vs. loops it with very little speed.
so when i show you clips of onside kicks hardly bouncing on dry fields, then what?
what that ball did had everything to do with the way it was kicked and the completely unpredictable way it landed due to it being football shaped.