CMR Spotting GT 7 free points

and LOL at saying it was a bad call because the field was wet. that variable is actually in our favor. a wet, bouncing football is much more difficult to hold onto. if anything, that made the call better not worse

Except that the ball hardly bounced. The water softens the turf, play some golf, so the ball didn't carry to Berrios. If the turf is dry, the ball gets to Berrios and is either Miami's or GT's at that spot. A wet ball is in our favor if he linedrive kicks it vs. loops it with very little speed.

so when i show you clips of onside kicks hardly bouncing on dry fields, then what?

what that ball did had everything to do with the way it was kicked and the completely unpredictable way it landed due to it being football shaped.
 
Advertisement
Stop drinking that Flint water.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7DTNEa2E7w

Sorry, had to post it! Split hairs as to why the ball didn't bounce when the real issue was the execution was really BAD. Think it was Dean or Carter who went for the wrong GT player. The first few Miami guys ran to a man not in front of them but closer to Berrios. The last one (#6 or #5 ) ran straight up field leaving the GT player free to make the play. If the kid hits the GT player, Berrios gets the ball.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top