Points win games, not time of possession
Going back to when Manny was hired, and fire the old offensive staff,
If he doesn’t totally revamp the offensive staff now he’s a farce, liar, used car salesman
Coley was running a pro style offense but out of spread formations. He went and visited the cowboys and came back with that dumb idea smh. Tempro ****Some posters think that any guy who runs a spread is going to bring success.
That’s not the case.
Coley went mostly spread in 2015 and we sucked.
You need a good OL to run any type of offense successfully.
Ours is horrible.
Coley was running a pro style offense put of spread formations. He went and visited the cowboys and came back with that smh.
No we want a spread offense. Not a pro style offense in the gun. Richt ran a pro style mostly out the gun here.Call it whatever you want, we were in Shotgun around 90% of the time that season.
That seems to be what most posters crave and we still sucked.
Being in the shotgun does not mean your offense is spread. That's just a formation. A spread offense is the play calling, blocking schemes, spacing, route combinations, tempo.Call it whatever you want, we were in Shotgun around 90% of the time that season.
That seems to be what most posters crave and we still sucked.
Exactly, its an aggressive mindset, that wants to spread the defense and make them defend the entire field.. That makes them have more defenders in one on one situations where they have to go against one of your better athletes. When you are milking clock, limiting number of plays, have everyone squeezed in box, play action 7 step drop, fb dive.. ugh..Being in the shotgun does not mean your offense is spread. That's just a formation. A spread offense is the play calling, blocking schemes, spacing, route combinations, tempo.
Coley is a pro-style guy that tried to do some spread concepts, like Richt, and those offenses looked disjointed because neither Coley nor Richt had intricate knowledge of the spread offense.
The good pro-style spread teams are concept based, like the Air Raid, and try to do a few things really well. The bad ones try to mix in spread formations and concepts with pro-style language and approaches, call themselves "multiple," and are inefficient at most everything.
It's very difficult for college teams to actually be really, really good at multiple comprehensive concepts. The amount of practice time and the versatility or roster depth necessary to be balanced between the run and pass is usually beyond most programs. You see this most prominently at tight end.
This is why its difficult to have discussions online because you can be wasting time going back n forth and the person isnt educated on whats goin on..Can you explain the difference between a pro style and a spread offense?
We need an OC who can adapt the scheme to the available roster to maximize their talent.
What we've got is one who has a scheme that will work for a precise combination of personnel that we don't have.
I'm reminded of the Simpsons episode when the town had a surplus and ****ed it away on a monorail.\There was a bunch of talk of being "multiple" before the season began, which obviously hasn't been substantiated, or at least to the level that is needed. A lot of people on here thought the offense would be getting a lot of new looks. Maybe Enos is the one who sold CMD a dream.
Our offensive is multiple-multiple pieces of sh't.\There was a bunch of talk of being "multiple" before the season began, which obviously hasn't been substantiated, or at least to the level that is needed. A lot of people on here thought the offense would be getting a lot of new looks. Maybe Enos is the one who sold CMD a dream.