CFP Offensive Statistics

How do you recruit offensive players with the type of output we have had? Honestly, amazing anyone would want to be in this system.
 
Advertisement

giphy.gif
 
Points win games, not time of possession

Going back to when Manny was hired, and fire the old offensive staff,

If he doesn’t totally revamp the offensive staff now he’s a farce, liar, used car salesman

Scoring more points than the other team wins games.

Show me a team, college or pro, in the past 20 years that won a championship without a stout defense. Better yet, go back 50 years, it a pretty short list.

Our problem is we suck offensively and defensively combined with playing stupidly at the most inopportune times. Don't fall for the banana in the tailpipe (aka tackles for lost). When another teams has to move down the field to win the game, they've done it.
 
Some posters think that any guy who runs a spread is going to bring success.

That’s not the case.

Coley went mostly spread in 2015 and we sucked.

You need a good OL to run any type of offense successfully.

Ours is horrible.
Coley was running a pro style offense but out of spread formations. He went and visited the cowboys and came back with that dumb idea smh. Tempro ****
 
Advertisement
Coley was running a pro style offense put of spread formations. He went and visited the cowboys and came back with that smh.

Call it whatever you want, we were in Shotgun around 90% of the time that season.

That seems to be what most posters crave and we still sucked.
 
In fact when Richt was hired, many on here were happy we were finally going to line up under center again and use a fullback.

How times change.
 
Call it whatever you want, we were in Shotgun around 90% of the time that season.

That seems to be what most posters crave and we still sucked.
No we want a spread offense. Not a pro style offense in the gun. Richt ran a pro style mostly out the gun here.
 
Advertisement
Call it whatever you want, we were in Shotgun around 90% of the time that season.

That seems to be what most posters crave and we still sucked.
Being in the shotgun does not mean your offense is spread. That's just a formation. A spread offense is the play calling, blocking schemes, spacing, route combinations, tempo.

Coley is a pro-style guy that tried to do some spread concepts, like Richt, and those offenses looked disjointed because neither Coley nor Richt had intricate knowledge of the spread offense.
 
Being in the shotgun does not mean your offense is spread. That's just a formation. A spread offense is the play calling, blocking schemes, spacing, route combinations, tempo.

Coley is a pro-style guy that tried to do some spread concepts, like Richt, and those offenses looked disjointed because neither Coley nor Richt had intricate knowledge of the spread offense.
Exactly, its an aggressive mindset, that wants to spread the defense and make them defend the entire field.. That makes them have more defenders in one on one situations where they have to go against one of your better athletes. When you are milking clock, limiting number of plays, have everyone squeezed in box, play action 7 step drop, fb dive.. ugh..

Every coach now takes from spread concepts, the worst are old coaches who cant adapt and they try to do some type of mix and teach their players multiple things on limited practice time.


The good pro-style spread teams are concept based, like the Air Raid, and try to do a few things really well. The bad ones try to mix in spread formations and concepts with pro-style language and approaches, call themselves "multiple," and are inefficient at most everything.



It's very difficult for college teams to actually be really, really good at multiple comprehensive concepts. The amount of practice time and the versatility or roster depth necessary to be balanced between the run and pass is usually beyond most programs. You see this most prominently at tight end.

https://www.footballstudyhall.com/2...-offense-smashmouth-option-air-raid-pro-style
 
Beyond those stats look at the style of play. We might not see more than 10 snaps under center in these games combined.

All aggressive coaches who know no lead is safe.
 
Can you explain the difference between a pro style and a spread offense?
This is why its difficult to have discussions online because you can be wasting time going back n forth and the person isnt educated on whats goin on..

Urban does a good job on breaking it down, even though he gets his kstate years mixed up..

 
Advertisement
Again, Diaz ISN'T about the offense scoring in the thirty point range. Let alone the forty-point range.

For instance, in his post game presser after the unthinkable lost to Carolina Blue, he said " TWENTY-FIVE POINTS " were enough to win the ball game!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ouch.

The bottom line is Diaz simply CONNED the vast majority of Cane fans nation wide, into believing the offense would be geared for the 21st Century. After all, scoring 17 points against Central Michigan is all Cane fan needs to know about Diaz and Enos!! Albeit, CM finished with a winning record ( 8-4 ) and lost their game in the M.A.C. championship game.
 
We need an OC who can adapt the scheme to the available roster to maximize their talent.

What we've got is one who has a scheme that will work for a precise combination of personnel that we don't have.

\There was a bunch of talk of being "multiple" before the season began, which obviously hasn't been substantiated, or at least to the level that is needed. A lot of people on here thought the offense would be getting a lot of new looks. Maybe Enos is the one who sold CMD a dream.
 
\There was a bunch of talk of being "multiple" before the season began, which obviously hasn't been substantiated, or at least to the level that is needed. A lot of people on here thought the offense would be getting a lot of new looks. Maybe Enos is the one who sold CMD a dream.
I'm reminded of the Simpsons episode when the town had a surplus and ****ed it away on a monorail.
 
Advertisement
\There was a bunch of talk of being "multiple" before the season began, which obviously hasn't been substantiated, or at least to the level that is needed. A lot of people on here thought the offense would be getting a lot of new looks. Maybe Enos is the one who sold CMD a dream.
Our offensive is multiple-multiple pieces of sh't.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top