RiDLer80
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 20,295
Here are the offensive rankings for the four teams in the CFP this year:
Scoring Offense:
OSU-1
LSU-3
Clemson-4
OU-5
Miami-73
Total Offense:
LSU-1
OU-2
Clemson-3
OSU-5
Miami-90
Yards per play:
OU-1
LSU-3
Clemson-4
OSU-7
Miami-71
3rd down conversion %
OSU-1
OU-5
LSU-6
Clemson-14
Miami-Dead ******* last
Obviously stating the obvious here, but in today's day and age of college football you have to be able to score points. I don't know how Diaz can look at today's college landscape and continue to employ En_s. The leap we'd have to take to even be an average offense would be massive, and even that size of a leap wouldn't put us where we need to be. This offensive style of football isn't conducive to to winning at the highest level-ask Kirby Smart and UGA. We NEED to go spread in order to just be relevant again.
Scoring Offense:
OSU-1
LSU-3
Clemson-4
OU-5
Miami-73
Total Offense:
LSU-1
OU-2
Clemson-3
OSU-5
Miami-90
Yards per play:
OU-1
LSU-3
Clemson-4
OSU-7
Miami-71
3rd down conversion %
OSU-1
OU-5
LSU-6
Clemson-14
Miami-Dead ******* last
Obviously stating the obvious here, but in today's day and age of college football you have to be able to score points. I don't know how Diaz can look at today's college landscape and continue to employ En_s. The leap we'd have to take to even be an average offense would be massive, and even that size of a leap wouldn't put us where we need to be. This offensive style of football isn't conducive to to winning at the highest level-ask Kirby Smart and UGA. We NEED to go spread in order to just be relevant again.