If we want 40k seats, and MLS wants 25k, I don't see why we could not build a 30k stadium with the option to add on an extra 10k for big games like Florida State. Miami does not need anything bigger than 40k, and soccer stadiums are built close to the field, meaning the atmosphere at those games would be crazy. It would be loud as ****, and it would look a lot better if we sold out every game, instead of 40 thousand seats being empty on national television.
The seats in soccer stadiums are built close to the soccer field. As a football field isn't nearly as wide, you're still going to end up with this no matter how close they build them:
Playing in a stadium that seats 30k also robs you of the other 42k seats that you can sell tickets for at SLS, and the revenue created from concessions, parking, merchandise etc (besides the ticket revenue that you get even if they don't show up) UM's football program is currently on life support and moving to some FCSesque stadium will be the death knell.
Did you really just post a picture of how terrible Sun Life is and then try to use that as justificiation for why we should stay in Sun Life?
Yeah buddy, we should stay in sun life because the new stadium might be as bad as Sun Life! Lulz.
Sun Life is so wide because it was built to house baseball. Not soccer. Look at your photo above. That's obvious to the untrained eye, the field is wide because you can fit a baseball diamond on it.
And that's why you can't really play football at Marlins Park. Too wide.
In 1994, the United States hosted the World Cup... international soccer matches were held in dozens of NFL and college football stadiums around the country.
Soldier Field, the Rose Bowl, Foxboro, Giants Stadium, RFK, the Cotton Bowl, etc all hosted World Cup matches.
Are they too wide like Sun Life, or how do you explain these stadiums hosting many World Cup and international soccer events?
Last edited: