Aranda To Lsu

[DuffleBagYoda]

Good

 

[CanesAreAble]

If we are talking current NFL asst coaches, my dream guy would have to be Jason Tarver from the 49ers.

That dude's resume is nastier than a West Virginian crack w4ore


He was part of Harbaugh's staff at Stanford and joined him in SF

San Francisco 49ers: Jason Tarver

He never coached under Harbaugh at Stanford or San Francisco.

 

[KANE]

Look down dude. There's a thread that says, Aranda To LSU. 6 pages!

 

[IndianaCane3]

Apologies to reposting this. I somehow didn't see it.

 

[GaCane1213]

If we are talking current NFL asst coaches, my dream guy would have to be Jason Tarver from the 49ers.

That dude's resume is nastier than a West Virginian crack w4ore


He was part of Harbaugh's staff at Stanford and joined him in SF

San Francisco 49ers: Jason Tarver

He never coached under Harbaugh at Stanford or San Francisco.

Tarver is nice. Don't see him coming

 

[MedleyCane]

He would have been amazing but never saw anything linking him here. Disappointing that another team outbid us. Understandable though, lsu has money to blow

You just wrote there was never anything linking him to us. So how are you to jumping to we were outbid?

Well maybe not outbid.. But apparently he was available and looking to leave Wisconsin, and another team bought him.

Idk if we contacted him but stinks that we couldn't close on him since he ended up being a possibility

You contradicted yourself 2-3 times in that sentence.
Cool stuff.
LOL.

That's not a contradiction. He was available. I said it sucks we couldn't get him. He was a "possibility" meaning that he wasn't staying at Wisconsin and was going to wind up somewhere

Yeah, and Kate Upton is available too.
Re-read what you wrote.
You, like the rest of us, have no idea what is going with regards to who Richt is interested and, more importantly
in this case, if Aranda was interested.

 

[accomadus]

If we are talking current NFL asst coaches, my dream guy would have to be Jason Tarver from the 49ers.

That dude's resume is nastier than a West Virginian crack w4ore


He was part of Harbaugh's staff at Stanford and joined him in SF

San Francisco 49ers: Jason Tarver

He never coached under Harbaugh at Stanford or San Francisco.

Tarver is nice. Don't see him coming

Hence, I called him a dream guy. Able is right - he never coached under Harbaugh - they JUST missed eachother - for some weird reason, each time.

None the less, Tarver's resume is awesome. Dream hire, for sure.

 

[FullyERicht]

If we are talking current NFL asst coaches, my dream guy would have to be Jason Tarver from the 49ers.

That dude's resume is nastier than a West Virginian crack w4ore


He was part of Harbaugh's staff at Stanford and joined him in SF

San Francisco 49ers: Jason Tarver

He never coached under Harbaugh at Stanford or San Francisco.

Tarver is nice. Don't see him coming

Hence, I called him a dream guy. Able is right - he never coached under Harbaugh - they JUST missed eachother - for some weird reason, each time.

None the less, Tarver's resume is awesome. Dream hire, for sure.

SF is *** now, and this guy has zero play calling experience. Don't see this at all.

 

[Hardcore Cane]

Looks like both Jancek and Martinez will be coaching in Miami this year and Tenn is going after Shoop

But that's just a big rumor atm

 

[GaCane1213]

Looks like both Jancek and Martinez will be coaching in Miami this year and Tenn is going after Shoop

But that's just a big rumor atm

That won't happen. Ill take Vangorder over either of those two

 

[ghost2]

Very good coach but LSU way overpaid if the $1.7 million rumor is true.

 

[fresssh]

Raymond is not worth $1 mill. As I mentioned that $1 mill was reportedly a max number for an elite proven DC to come Miami.

Go Canes

Why would they specifically give Richt 1 million dollar budget for DC? Im sure they gave him an overall budget to fill his staff. Makes no sense to me why they would say your allowed 1 million for your DC.

 

[fresssh]

Very good coach but LSU way overpaid if the $1.7 million rumor is true.

No idea what they paid him, but coaches on the hot seat either have to hire coaches nobody wants or overpay.

 

[GaCane1213]

Very good coach but LSU way overpaid if the $1.7 million rumor is true.

No idea what they paid him, but coaches on the hot seat either have to hire coaches nobody wants or overpay.

1.7???? Yeah, we weren't in that bidding war. Just hoping we can pluck Raymond.

 

[dedostheibis]

Who says they outbid us?

He would have been amazing but never saw anything linking him here. Disappointing that another team outbid us. Understandable though, lsu has money to blow

You think we could outbid lsu? Muahahahah we only have 10,000 paid fans going to games with what money? Lol

 

[KCcane]

Looks like both Jancek and Martinez will be coaching in Miami this year and Tenn is going after Shoop

But that's just a big rumor atm

That won't happen. Ill take Vangorder over either of those two

The same guy who just got destroyed by Ohio State and players complain his scheme is too complicated for college? No thanks.

 

[mhkemh]

Aranda first game for LSU will be against Wisconsin should be interesting.

 

[HighSeas]

LSU Hires Dave Aranda as Defensive Coordinator | Smart Football

Aranda is also at the forefront of defending both read-option plays and has developed some interesting answers for packaged plays/run pass options in recent years.

One way Aranda keeps his defense simple but reactive is by giving his linebackers several reads on each play that can evolve both pre- and post-snap that nevertheless are only based on a few key looks for the players. In a private whiteboard session he told some high school coaches that when teaching a defense a rival school’s coaches (I won’t name names) might might draw up 75 different looks for their players, but for his there’s only three looks. Some examples of these reads can be found in this excellent article with Aranda from Xs and Os Labs, where he talks about how he combines one-gapping and two-gapping principles to defend the spread run game.

But a bunch of porsters here assured me that Aranda is a 3-4 2 gap Golden clone who can't defend spread offense.

Aranda, who runs a 4-3 base quarters package used to play single-gap control defense and wind up getting gashed for big yardage on zone wind backs because of a numbers advantage on the offense because of his two-safety look.

“[On a “Zeer” or zone-read-veer run scheme, n]o matter how you draw it up, the offense will have four guys at the point of attack: the QB, the tackle, the guard and the running back. If you’re a one gap type team and you’re playing it that way, whether your have a five and a 1-tech or a 3- and a 5-tech it really doesn’t matter because it’s four on three,” says Aranda. “You have two DL and one LB. The DE gets the shaft because he has to play two aspects: the dive, the bend of the dive to the inside out to the QB. You’re cheating a guy. An easy answer is to use someone from outside the box and bring him inside the box. The problem with that is the bubble screens and the now screens that are thrown by these offenses. Teams will read the LB that is walked out. If that LB steps up and reads run on the play action to handle QB on zone read. Once the QB sees him step up, he disconnects from the RB and throws the slant over the top of his head. It’s a tough play. I found you needed to get four and four and equate the numbers post-snap.”

[…]

Aranda has a very simple philosophy when it comes to his second level players playing the read game: If you’re in the core [i.e., the box], you play in the core and if you’re outside the core you play outside the core. “This handles all of that fly sweep you may see out of unbalanced formations,” says Aranda. “There is no inside linebacker needed to run down sweep, or safeties negating force. Everything must be assignment football, particularly when playing the option.”

His Mike LB’s assignment pre-snap when playing the Zone or Zeer read is to sit in the A gap, but post-snap he has some key progressions to work through starting with his first step. . . .

Initially, Aranda tells his Mike LB’s to work to stack the 2-technique, but as the play bends back he must be ready to fall back. To do that, he must be at five-yards. “If it’s coming tight downhill, that 2-technique is going to clear out the A gap. There is no A gap so it’s already bending back to begin with. As the offensive tackle is coming down on the 2-technique, and our 2-technique is already squeezing the guard, the RB will bend back. The further he bends back, there is our 5-technique. For our Mike LB reads, we play clear or cloudy. If they zone it, the guard surges on the 2-technqiue, the tackle wipes out the 2, now Mike is already sitting in the gap so he plays the back. If the back bends it and it’s cloudy (the end is there) the Mike is over the top and will be a QB player inside out. If the Tackle works to surge on 2-technique, then turns back out on the 5- technique (to open up the B gap) it’s a clear read so the Mike hits it. Essentially, he plays clear to cloudy and dive to inside out on QB. But everything works off the defensive tackles.”

[…]

“The way we play quarters, the outside LB is the force defender. We play the safety as sky force but it’s a replacement force if the LB gets cracked. We used to put the safety as the pitch player, but he also has number two vertical so he’s in conflict. Teams could run the back-side number two in orbit and now they have a pitch player. The LB plays into the number two receiver man-to-man. He’ll play the QB if he comes out his way and he’ll also play pitch. The safety is sitting off of him. He plays the outside half of QB to pitch. We tell the safety if number two blocks he triggers off that LB so we can get those two involved (diagram 15). Whenever that safety has pitch responsibility in a quarter’s system where he has two vertical, there is a problem. We need to be tied with the LB. We play crack replace with the safety so the LB can be more aggressive. If they run a slant/bubble combination, the safety must see the block on that LB. The LB who is covered down can play the run aggressively through receiver. The safety is the protector.”

lol @ all that mumbo jumbo scheme talk...just let your savages get upfield and everything is solved! Right blackvern?!?!

 

[FullyERicht]

LSU Hires Dave Aranda as Defensive Coordinator | Smart Football

Aranda is also at the forefront of defending both read-option plays and has developed some interesting answers for packaged plays/run pass options in recent years.

One way Aranda keeps his defense simple but reactive is by giving his linebackers several reads on each play that can evolve both pre- and post-snap that nevertheless are only based on a few key looks for the players. In a private whiteboard session he told some high school coaches that when teaching a defense a rival school’s coaches (I won’t name names) might might draw up 75 different looks for their players, but for his there’s only three looks. Some examples of these reads can be found in this excellent article with Aranda from Xs and Os Labs, where he talks about how he combines one-gapping and two-gapping principles to defend the spread run game.

But a bunch of porsters here assured me that Aranda is a 3-4 2 gap Golden clone who can't defend spread offense.

Aranda, who runs a 4-3 base quarters package used to play single-gap control defense and wind up getting gashed for big yardage on zone wind backs because of a numbers advantage on the offense because of his two-safety look.

“[On a “Zeer” or zone-read-veer run scheme, n]o matter how you draw it up, the offense will have four guys at the point of attack: the QB, the tackle, the guard and the running back. If you’re a one gap type team and you’re playing it that way, whether your have a five and a 1-tech or a 3- and a 5-tech it really doesn’t matter because it’s four on three,” says Aranda. “You have two DL and one LB. The DE gets the shaft because he has to play two aspects: the dive, the bend of the dive to the inside out to the QB. You’re cheating a guy. An easy answer is to use someone from outside the box and bring him inside the box. The problem with that is the bubble screens and the now screens that are thrown by these offenses. Teams will read the LB that is walked out. If that LB steps up and reads run on the play action to handle QB on zone read. Once the QB sees him step up, he disconnects from the RB and throws the slant over the top of his head. It’s a tough play. I found you needed to get four and four and equate the numbers post-snap.”

[…]

Aranda has a very simple philosophy when it comes to his second level players playing the read game: If you’re in the core [i.e., the box], you play in the core and if you’re outside the core you play outside the core. “This handles all of that fly sweep you may see out of unbalanced formations,” says Aranda. “There is no inside linebacker needed to run down sweep, or safeties negating force. Everything must be assignment football, particularly when playing the option.”

His Mike LB’s assignment pre-snap when playing the Zone or Zeer read is to sit in the A gap, but post-snap he has some key progressions to work through starting with his first step. . . .

Initially, Aranda tells his Mike LB’s to work to stack the 2-technique, but as the play bends back he must be ready to fall back. To do that, he must be at five-yards. “If it’s coming tight downhill, that 2-technique is going to clear out the A gap. There is no A gap so it’s already bending back to begin with. As the offensive tackle is coming down on the 2-technique, and our 2-technique is already squeezing the guard, the RB will bend back. The further he bends back, there is our 5-technique. For our Mike LB reads, we play clear or cloudy. If they zone it, the guard surges on the 2-technqiue, the tackle wipes out the 2, now Mike is already sitting in the gap so he plays the back. If the back bends it and it’s cloudy (the end is there) the Mike is over the top and will be a QB player inside out. If the Tackle works to surge on 2-technique, then turns back out on the 5- technique (to open up the B gap) it’s a clear read so the Mike hits it. Essentially, he plays clear to cloudy and dive to inside out on QB. But everything works off the defensive tackles.”

[…]

“The way we play quarters, the outside LB is the force defender. We play the safety as sky force but it’s a replacement force if the LB gets cracked. We used to put the safety as the pitch player, but he also has number two vertical so he’s in conflict. Teams could run the back-side number two in orbit and now they have a pitch player. The LB plays into the number two receiver man-to-man. He’ll play the QB if he comes out his way and he’ll also play pitch. The safety is sitting off of him. He plays the outside half of QB to pitch. We tell the safety if number two blocks he triggers off that LB so we can get those two involved (diagram 15). Whenever that safety has pitch responsibility in a quarter’s system where he has two vertical, there is a problem. We need to be tied with the LB. We play crack replace with the safety so the LB can be more aggressive. If they run a slant/bubble combination, the safety must see the block on that LB. The LB who is covered down can play the run aggressively through receiver. The safety is the protector.”

lol @ all that mumbo jumbo scheme talk...just let your savages get upfield and everything is solved! Right blackvern?!?!

That article was ripped off from and X and Os labs article from when Aranda was at Hawaii. He neither runs a 4-3, and his "two gapping" consisted of asking his DTs to disrupt the guard blocking in zone option teams.

 

[blackvern]

LSU Hires Dave Aranda as Defensive Coordinator | Smart Football

Aranda is also at the forefront of defending both read-option plays and has developed some interesting answers for packaged plays/run pass options in recent years.

One way Aranda keeps his defense simple but reactive is by giving his linebackers several reads on each play that can evolve both pre- and post-snap that nevertheless are only based on a few key looks for the players. In a private whiteboard session he told some high school coaches that when teaching a defense a rival school’s coaches (I won’t name names) might might draw up 75 different looks for their players, but for his there’s only three looks. Some examples of these reads can be found in this excellent article with Aranda from Xs and Os Labs, where he talks about how he combines one-gapping and two-gapping principles to defend the spread run game.

But a bunch of porsters here assured me that Aranda is a 3-4 2 gap Golden clone who can't defend spread offense.

Aranda, who runs a 4-3 base quarters package used to play single-gap control defense and wind up getting gashed for big yardage on zone wind backs because of a numbers advantage on the offense because of his two-safety look.

“[On a “Zeer” or zone-read-veer run scheme, n]o matter how you draw it up, the offense will have four guys at the point of attack: the QB, the tackle, the guard and the running back. If you’re a one gap type team and you’re playing it that way, whether your have a five and a 1-tech or a 3- and a 5-tech it really doesn’t matter because it’s four on three,” says Aranda. “You have two DL and one LB. The DE gets the shaft because he has to play two aspects: the dive, the bend of the dive to the inside out to the QB. You’re cheating a guy. An easy answer is to use someone from outside the box and bring him inside the box. The problem with that is the bubble screens and the now screens that are thrown by these offenses. Teams will read the LB that is walked out. If that LB steps up and reads run on the play action to handle QB on zone read. Once the QB sees him step up, he disconnects from the RB and throws the slant over the top of his head. It’s a tough play. I found you needed to get four and four and equate the numbers post-snap.”

[…]

Aranda has a very simple philosophy when it comes to his second level players playing the read game: If you’re in the core [i.e., the box], you play in the core and if you’re outside the core you play outside the core. “This handles all of that fly sweep you may see out of unbalanced formations,” says Aranda. “There is no inside linebacker needed to run down sweep, or safeties negating force. Everything must be assignment football, particularly when playing the option.”

His Mike LB’s assignment pre-snap when playing the Zone or Zeer read is to sit in the A gap, but post-snap he has some key progressions to work through starting with his first step. . . .

Initially, Aranda tells his Mike LB’s to work to stack the 2-technique, but as the play bends back he must be ready to fall back. To do that, he must be at five-yards. “If it’s coming tight downhill, that 2-technique is going to clear out the A gap. There is no A gap so it’s already bending back to begin with. As the offensive tackle is coming down on the 2-technique, and our 2-technique is already squeezing the guard, the RB will bend back. The further he bends back, there is our 5-technique. For our Mike LB reads, we play clear or cloudy. If they zone it, the guard surges on the 2-technqiue, the tackle wipes out the 2, now Mike is already sitting in the gap so he plays the back. If the back bends it and it’s cloudy (the end is there) the Mike is over the top and will be a QB player inside out. If the Tackle works to surge on 2-technique, then turns back out on the 5- technique (to open up the B gap) it’s a clear read so the Mike hits it. Essentially, he plays clear to cloudy and dive to inside out on QB. But everything works off the defensive tackles.”

[…]

“The way we play quarters, the outside LB is the force defender. We play the safety as sky force but it’s a replacement force if the LB gets cracked. We used to put the safety as the pitch player, but he also has number two vertical so he’s in conflict. Teams could run the back-side number two in orbit and now they have a pitch player. The LB plays into the number two receiver man-to-man. He’ll play the QB if he comes out his way and he’ll also play pitch. The safety is sitting off of him. He plays the outside half of QB to pitch. We tell the safety if number two blocks he triggers off that LB so we can get those two involved (diagram 15). Whenever that safety has pitch responsibility in a quarter’s system where he has two vertical, there is a problem. We need to be tied with the LB. We play crack replace with the safety so the LB can be more aggressive. If they run a slant/bubble combination, the safety must see the block on that LB. The LB who is covered down can play the run aggressively through receiver. The safety is the protector.”

lol @ all that mumbo jumbo scheme talk...just let your savages get upfield and everything is solved! Right blackvern?!?!

never said he is a golden clome...didnt say it wasnt successful I just dont think its a great fit here..Georigia Techs option has been successfull in the ACC why dont you want that here? It could easily be stated with our better athletes we would steam roll the competetion.... but i dont want that, dont trust it even though its a succesful system....Its a preference that I have..Thats all it is. If we got him I'd be ok with it id rather another system that is all