Anyone who is as dumb as Brian Smith to think that UM recruiting will be hurt by Ed Reed calling out Del Rio's opinion really should not have a job writing about the Canes or sports because sports is clearly too complicated a subject for him. This not about censorship so much as the Peter principle. This guy Smith is clearly in way over his head. I think a position of assistant to the assistant editor maybe more suited to his level of competence.
He has no clue thinking that it would affect recruiting.
Anyone who is as dumb as Brian Smith to think that UM recruiting will be hurt by Ed Reed calling out Del Rio's opinion really should not have a job writing about the Canes or sports because sports is clearly too complicated a subject for him. This not about censorship so much as the Peter principle. This guy Smith is clearly in way over his head. I think a position of assistant to the assistant editor maybe more suited to his level of competence.
As always, the issue is not expressing an opinion. It’s expressing an opinion while representing a company that doesn’t want the attention. F*ck, let’s quit it with the “I can’t have an opinion” nonsense. You can have an opinion all you like, but your company can fire you’re *** if they don’t like it. That’s freedom of speech too.![]()
Getting tired of people not being allowed or blatantly being discouraged from expressing their opinions
Well, regarding that last sentence, they better be careful how they execute that decision or leave themselves vulnerable to a wrongful termination suit.As always, the issue is not expressing an opinion. It’s expressing an opinion while representing a company that doesn’t want the attention. F*ck, let’s quit it with the “I can’t have an opinion” nonsense. You can have an opinion all you like, but your company can fire you’re *** if they don’t like it. That’s freedom of speech too.
Yep. Fair or not, Del Rio is a representing the team 24/7 by virtue of his position in the organization. He can complain, but he can also resign from his job, forsake his likely $1M+ salary, and retire on his millions or take a position where he can freely speak his mind.I think you mean figuratively, not literally. No one has been physically slapped.
As I said, I don't see a first amendment issue because Washington ownership can make reasonable restrictions on what employees can say because it could affect the company's profits.
Now outside that employer restriction and just looking at content, I think there is interesting narrative control going on. If you look at history, disputing the results of elections goes back to the beginning of the country. It's happened many times, but the important difference is it was always non-violent b!tching about the results. Personally, I disagree that the election was fraudulent, but I don't think someone who claims it was fraudulent is automatically a racist. What is generally unprecedented is people trying to stop the transfer of power with violence.
I also don't think it is racist to hold the opinion that a thousand or so rioters didn't actually pose a serious threat to democracy and that claiming the country was on teetering on the edge of a coup is a bit of an exaggeration.
Unless he thinks it’s helping.He has no clue thinking that it would affect recruiting.
I assume most organizations have vaguely worded clauses in their contracts mentioning “conduct” that allow them to punish an employee for anything they think reflects poorly upon them. If not, they’ll soon find out.Well, regarding that last sentence, they better be careful how they execute that decision or leave themselves vulnerable to a wrongful termination suit.
FOS is from the govt. not your employer.As always, the issue is not expressing an opinion. It’s expressing an opinion while representing a company that doesn’t want the attention. F*ck, let’s quit it with the “I can’t have an opinion” nonsense. You can have an opinion all you like, but your company can fire you’re *** if they don’t like it. That’s freedom of speech too.
Exactly, that was a much simpler way of saying it.FOS is from the govt. not your employer.
Has an athlete ever been fined for sharing his opinion before?
Government may be corrupt. But he can say whatever tf he wants.Ed needs shut up on this one. All government is corrupt. Biben can't put his tighty whites on in the morning without help
Ed needs shut up on this one. All government is corrupt. Biben can't put his tighty whites on in the morning without help
Nobody but you brought the government into this.Ed needs shut up on this one. All government is corrupt. Biben can't put his tighty whites on in the morning without help
His comment has been deleted. Clearly he could not understand the side of the line we were all standing on and he went way, way, way overboard.Nobody but you brought the government into this.
I don't could you clarify?Well, some can and some can’t. I am sure you know who’s who.
One guy, can’t remember his name, was basically kicked out of the league. Even though nobody would admit it, he was blackballed to the point nobody would even give him a tryout. Fans would say “he’s still better than Player X”, but for some reason no team would pick him up. And all because he spoke his mind in a way that hurt some feelings.Has an athlete ever been fined for sharing his opinion before?
I remember that guy, his name escapes me though. I also remember another guy that played baseball that had his likely HOF career ended early because he spoke out about some things. Amazing how their names are lost to history.....One guy, can’t remember his name, was basically kicked out of the league. Even though nobody would admit it, he was blackballed to the point nobody would even give him a tryout. Fans would say “he’s still better than Player X”, but for some reason no team would pick him up. And all because he spoke his mind in a way that hurt some feelings.