• Attention: Register today to view CanesInSight Ad-Free for 7 days.

ACC Coastal Recruiting

Canes_

Sophomore
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
729
247 Composite Ranking (# of recruits 4 star or better):

11. Miami (10 of 24)
25. Virginia Tech (5 of 26)
27. UNC (5 of 21)
35. PITT (3 of 23)
44. Georgia Tech (1 of 24)
45. Duke (1 of 22)
54. Virginia (0 of 25)

The last two classes have widened our talent gap (2015 was a real down year). We need to start owning this division.

btw with FSU at #6 (11 of 23) we have the second ranked class in the conference. Clemson has a small class and is currently at #15 (11 of 14).
 

AllbouttheU

King Dingaling
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
7,380
No doubt we should start winning the Coastal. Hopefully Richt doesn't **** things up like last season.
 

jnf2257

Junior
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
1,852
And the margin between us and the top-10 is razor thin. Its a great class with a couple of small holes.
 

Bennubird

Senior
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
3,894
QB and OL play will be key. Our defense will help us get rolling early and should give our new QB plenty of opportunities.
 

streetja

Please fire me
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4,046
And the margin between us and the top-10 is razor thin. Its a great class with a couple of small holes.

Good/very good class but incomplete in respects to our roster needs and the amount of misses on hometown guys.

Nonetheless, there's a huge distance between us and the rest of the coastal. We've got to win it.
 

FyreHam

Freshman
Joined
Apr 27, 2016
Messages
663
247 Composite Ranking (# of recruits 4 star or better):

11. Miami (10 of 24)
25. Virginia Tech (5 of 26)
27. UNC (5 of 21)
35. PITT (3 of 23)
44. Georgia Tech (1 of 24)
45. Duke (1 of 22)
54. Virginia (0 of 25)

The last two classes have widened our talent gap (2015 was a real down year). We need to start owning this division.

btw with FSU at #6 (11 of 23) we have the second ranked class in the conference. Clemson has a small class and is currently at #15 (11 of 14).

Clemson and Miami's class are equal, can't say Miami's is better. It's deeper because Clemson doesn't have room, but they could have filled it out with 3-star prospects.
 

Tad Footeball

1996 Interim Big East Conference Commissioner
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
14,279
I guess Fedora has a "cloud" or whatever but VagTech has to be disappointed in Fuente's initial results- with Durkin at a completely junk Maryland program not too far away clo$ing on a few big name kids.
 

jnf2257

Junior
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
1,852
And the margin between us and the top-10 is razor thin. Its a great class with a couple of small holes.

Good/very good class but incomplete in respects to our roster needs and the amount of misses on hometown guys.

Nonetheless, there's a huge distance between us and the rest of the coastal. We've got to win it.

We can agree to disagree. i'm sticking with great class.

Our biggest roster needs were OL, DB, WR and QB. We got three out of four. If we had snagged Henderson and another great DB it would have been elite.
 
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
8,395
Y'all are stupid acting like we're better without Kaaya.

The only thing that's gunna keep us from winning the coastal is our ol. We got a lot of improving to do there.
 

kryptonite

AARP
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
11,260
247 Composite Ranking (# of recruits 4 star or better):

11. Miami (10 of 24)
25. Virginia Tech (5 of 26)
27. UNC (5 of 21)
35. PITT (3 of 23)
44. Georgia Tech (1 of 24)
45. Duke (1 of 22)
54. Virginia (0 of 25)

The last two classes have widened our talent gap (2015 was a real down year). We need to start owning this division.

btw with FSU at #6 (11 of 23) we have the second ranked class in the conference. Clemson has a small class and is currently at #15 (11 of 14).

Clemson and Miami's class are equal, can't say Miami's is better. It's deeper because Clemson doesn't have room, but they could have filled it out with 3-star prospects.

Looking at stars, you most certainly can say clem's is better. They took almost 78% blue chips, we were 42%. You can't penalize them for not taking a bigger class if they didn't need one. Quality and meeting needs should be the measure, so unless they whiffed at a position or two, that's a real good class. I like ours as well, but you can't **** with that quality level.
 

Canes_

Sophomore
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
729
247 Composite Ranking (# of recruits 4 star or better):

11. Miami (10 of 24)
25. Virginia Tech (5 of 26)
27. UNC (5 of 21)
35. PITT (3 of 23)
44. Georgia Tech (1 of 24)
45. Duke (1 of 22)
54. Virginia (0 of 25)

The last two classes have widened our talent gap (2015 was a real down year). We need to start owning this division.

btw with FSU at #6 (11 of 23) we have the second ranked class in the conference. Clemson has a small class and is currently at #15 (11 of 14).

Clemson and Miami's class are equal, can't say Miami's is better. It's deeper because Clemson doesn't have room, but they could have filled it out with 3-star prospects.

I never said our class was better, I said it was ranked higher by 247. They have a small class that's high on quality obviously.
 

FyreHam

Freshman
Joined
Apr 27, 2016
Messages
663
247 Composite Ranking (# of recruits 4 star or better):

11. Miami (10 of 24)
25. Virginia Tech (5 of 26)
27. UNC (5 of 21)
35. PITT (3 of 23)
44. Georgia Tech (1 of 24)
45. Duke (1 of 22)
54. Virginia (0 of 25)

The last two classes have widened our talent gap (2015 was a real down year). We need to start owning this division.

btw with FSU at #6 (11 of 23) we have the second ranked class in the conference. Clemson has a small class and is currently at #15 (11 of 14).

Clemson and Miami's class are equal, can't say Miami's is better. It's deeper because Clemson doesn't have room, but they could have filled it out with 3-star prospects.

Looking at stars, you most certainly can say clem's is better. They took almost 78% blue chips, we were 42%. You can't penalize them for not taking a bigger class if they didn't need one. Quality and meeting needs should be the measure, so unless they whiffed at a position or two, that's a real good class. I like ours as well, but you can't **** with that quality level.

That's completely fair. That's why I said Miami > Clemson wasn't true because the ratings favor volume.

I said it was equal in blue chips, but by ratio, yes, Clemson wins.
 
Top