Tired of making the same post

Tired of making the same post

DMoney
DMoney

Comments (1163)

We got up to the line and did the hard count every single play. A&M didn’t jump a single time. Then did check with me and drug the play clock down.

We could have really caught them off guard snapping it quickly a few times and probably could have pulled them offsides a few times after that and get a free play and maybe luck up and catch one downfield.

Didn’t even try.


Agree with you that we should have done it more but we did get them offsides twice. One was blown dead and the other was a big completion to Keyshawn on a deep comeback.
 
Agree with you that we should have done it more but we did get them offsides twice. One was blown dead and the other was a big completion to Keyshawn on a deep comeback.
I remember the one blown dead. Didn’t remember the comeback to Keyshawn. **** looked a lot different there than when I watched it back on the condensed version.
 
We muffed a punt which led to an A&M touchdown.

We had two missed/blocked field goals.

We had multiple dumb penalties in the red zone.

A&M played a clean game, we didn’t. That was the difference. Execution, execution, execution.

I get very sick and tired of you guys blaming “skeem” for EVERY loss. Hold our players accountable for once.

Two missed field goals and a gimme TD after a stupid decision to try to field a punt….that’s 13 points just on stupid mental errors alone. We lost by 8.
 
Advertisement
Uninspired. That’s the feeling I had leaving Kyle Field. It’s not the right thing to say as the owner of a fan website, but it’s the truth. It was a boring game with a familiar result. Let’s get the obvious out of the way: it's early, this is a building process, and it's way too early to make any sweeping observation about the Cristobal Era. But this was a major missed opportunity to build momentum in recruiting and within the fanbase. Some specific thoughts:

- We paid too much money for nine points. Gattis is accountable for the end result, no matter how fluky (first team since at least 2000 to have 27 first downs and zero touchdowns). Our pace was puzzling to me. Is there a distinct advantage to going no huddle when we move so slowly?

- The game was lost when we ran three times in the red zone and kicked a field goal down 17-3. You can’t say you have the best QB in the country and then show a complete lack of faith in him.

- The past few years, and this weekend in particular, really hammered a point home: WR has become a Top 3 important position in football. Look at the Dolphins on Sunday. Maybe someone who charted the game can correct me, but I can’t remember a single contested catch in 41 passes. “NFL open” does not exist in our passing game. We have body catchers, not snatchers. We should not miss guys like Rambo (undrafted), Harley (undrafted) and Restrepo as much as we do. This is Miami. The whiffs in the Transfer Portal really showed up on Saturday.

- Upon rewatch, I’m not as down on TVD. He played bad, but his degree of difficulty was off the charts. I thought back to my first time watching him at Paradise Camp. I expected a big, mechanical QB who would drive the ball but struggle to create. Instead, I saw an instinctive athlete who changed speeds and arm angles and thrived with a fast tempo. It feels like we are trying to put him back in that box with the slow-developing plays.

TVD is tough and will hang in until the last second to make the throw, but he should have more quick-hitting options to get in rhythm. It reminds me of Kaaya under Richt. There was a regression (and four losses) followed by schematic adjustment to get the ball out of his hands quicker. Those changes were in response to poor OL play, which isn’t really our problem. But they got results. I hope we see similar adjustments before the losses pile up.

- Some of our recruiting victories over the SEC showed up on Saturday. Jalen Rivers was moving people and is a huge reason for our improved running game. Leonard Taylor brings special interior rush ability, which is the best way to disrupt a passing game. James Williams missed a key tackle on the Achane TD, but otherwise was everywhere as a versatile weapon. We need more like those guys.

- The running backs ran hard and finished above their weight class. I was disappointed we didn’t have anything special cooked up for Jaylan Knighton in the passing game. He is our most explosive player and we need everything we can get.

- Happy for DJ Ivey. His game elevates when he tackles with physicality. The more he plays with a confident edge, the more he will finish at the catch point with length and timing.

- In general, this game looked very much like what we saw on Greentree. Struggles with downfield passing game, improved OL, strong DL, elevated DB play. For all the talk about Greentree All-Americans, the players generally play like they practice.

- Jacolby George needs to lock in. He’s clearly the most talented pure WR, but when Joe Rose asked Mario about him this AM the first thing Mario talked about was off-field reliability. This is a huge opportunity for George and he needs to seize it.

- Kamren Kinchens is playing faster every game. His football IQ is as good as it gets, and he is really starting to trust his instincts and pull the trigger.

- I like the way the pass rush is trending. We are 5th in the nation in sack percentage and a lot of people are contributing. That rush will lead to wins in ACC play.

- The most encouraging long-term sign is the OL. We looked strong against an SEC team and Mario is recruiting behemoths. If Miami becomes an OL program, it will raise our floor.

Overall, the improvements in physicality were apparent but we gave away a winnable game. Muffed punts, drops, penalties, missed kicks. Before the season, I expected a year like Mario’s first at Oregon or Richt’s first at Miami. That’s still the projection. This offense and pace will lead to a lot of close games where anything can happen. Time for the coaches to earn their money and make the necessary adjustments.

Fair assessment.

"The game was lost when we ran three times in the red zone and kicked a field goal down 17-3"

Yeah we were not going to walk it into the end zone. You had to throw it in there to have a chance.

Hoping this year he can keep building the lines and the overall talent level. If he doesn't eventually evolve to have an offense that is as physical as what he wants on the OL but also dynamic passing the ball his tenure ultimately will not be successful.
 
Advertisement
Lol we had the argument in the off-season amongst the common posters bro @DMoney but I firmly believe WR is the SECOND most important position in todays game
Some have been preaching for yearssss on this, I know you been in same about recruiting a legit 6'1 wr who got 10.6 speed here SOPHMORE year in high school.. Like we NEED that.. People dont understand the implications.. I hope when they watch dolphins after watching us back 2 back the lightbulb comes on in more heads.. They not paying them boys 100 milli for nothing and top schools not stockpiling them for no reason either.. We behind the curve still..
 
I agree. But I asked for a player.

I didn't think anyone was uninspired. The OL played the best game we've played against an SEC-type team in 10+ years. Just fantastic overall.

The backs were excellent, except for the Parrish drop (which was an absolute killer, by the way).

TVD isn't as good as people here thought he was for beating up on a bunch of terrible teams last year. He's a good player, a good college QB, he's not great.

The WR's are who we thought they were. Can't separate, and can't catch. Not a single one of these kids will get a sniff on Sundays.

The good news? With an OL this good, we should be able to have much more success against weaker teams, which is what we play the rest of the season until we get to Clemson. It's also Game 3, so I expect the execution to improve as we move forward.

The bad news? The ceiling on this offense is very limited with the lack of playmakers on the outside and with the conservative nature of our staff. So, in weeks where the defense doesn't play its best, and/or when we face above-average offenses (UNC will be the first test), and we have to score to win, there's a good possibility we're going to be in dogfights because the offense just doesn't have the ability to pull away from people.

I still feel good about 9-3, but I wouldn't be shocked if we lost 2 games, aside from Clemson, that we really shouldn't, simply because the defense has a down day or we face a QB who gets hot, and we just can't keep up. I know I already mentioned it, but UNC in 3 weeks scares the **** out of me with this exact scenario playing out. If we win that game, I think 9-3 is probably the worst we finish. Luckily for us, I don't see very many explosive offenses on the schedule going forward.
 
On the field? Idk.

Off the field - Thad Franklin. His sideline demeanor wasn’t good. One drive in the red zone or close to it.. I assume he was supposed to be beside Kevin Smith and he was sitting on the bench. They were looking for him to send him in the game and couldn’t find him and scrambled and they eventually ran Parrish back out there. Thad got lit into during the FG attempt a few plays later.
I was sitting right behind them. for most of the night, Thad WAS standing right next to SMith. cooney was also around. I didn't notice when he sat down.
I will say I wondered all night why they didn't put him in more on those late down, short yardage situations.
 
Advertisement
Perhaps someone can explain this to me. In the 4th quarter when we had 4th down at the 3 yard line, the HC decided to kick a field goal rather than use that one play to try to score a TD. Apparently, he reasoned that we had a better chance of making that kick and then later scoring a TD AND thereafter making a 2 point conversion from the 2 yard line to tie the game. If you do not trust the team to score in one play from the 3 [earning at least 6 points so that another TD wins the game] how do you play for a tie game by stopping TAM and then scoring on our next possession AND then scoring 2 on one play from the 2? This felt very corch-like to me.
 
I didn't expect to win, and I am not upset.

I wish we had won, but we were playing a desperate talented team in their building in front of over 100K.

This was an absolute must win for Jimbo. Year 5 for him, game 3 for Mario. Jimbo had the better roster.

We made special team miscues that cost us the game. Miami looked better in a lot of areas than past years.
 
Advertisement
Great post D Money!

My two main offensive concerns are TVD locking in on his primary receiver allows the defense to better prepare for our meh passing game and still little to no throws to the TEs. If we are going to have a short to medium passing game we need the TEs to be relevant.

My other concern is Special Teams. Wow. Did not expect to worry about this. We are suspect on Punt Return and FG. 13 points we either allowed or ****ed away that cost us a very winnable game.
 
Last edited:
I was sitting right behind them. for most of the night, Thad WAS standing right next to SMith. cooney was also around. I didn't notice when he sat down.
I will say I wondered all night why they didn't put him in more on those late down, short yardage situations.
I was right there too. Pretty sure it was the 4th quarter on the drive where we made it 17-9
 
The backs were excellent, except for the Parrish drop (which was an absolute killer, by the way).

TVD isn't as good as people here thought he was for beating up on a bunch of terrible teams last year. He's a good player, a good college QB, he's not great.

The WR's are who we thought they were. Can't separate, and can't catch. Not a single one of these kids will get a sniff on Sundays.

The good news? With an OL this good, we should be able to have much more success against weaker teams, which is what we play the rest of the season until we get to Clemson. It's also Game 3, so I expect the execution to improve as we move forward.

The bad news? The ceiling on this offense is very limited with the lack of playmakers on the outside and with the conservative nature of our staff. So, in weeks where the defense doesn't play its best, and/or when we face above-average offenses (UNC will be the first test), and we have to score to win, there's a good possibility we're going to be in dogfights because the offense just doesn't have the ability to pull away from people.

I still feel good about 9-3, but I wouldn't be shocked if we lost 2 games, aside from Clemson, that we really shouldn't, simply because the defense has a down day or we face a QB who gets hot, and we just can't keep up. I know I already mentioned it, but UNC in 3 weeks scares the **** out of me with this exact scenario playing out. If we win that game, I think 9-3 is probably the worst we finish. Luckily for us, I don't see very many explosive offenses on the schedule going forward.
that Parrish drop was the worst of the game.. with the way he moves.. he likely scores
 
Last edited:
Been tryna hammer it home on the WR point on here for awhile, I saw it when OSU could have a bilitnekoff finalist sit bench and watch him walk because they were stockpiling WRs, made post about it years ago that OSU, Okla, LSU, Bama, Clemson were stockpiling WR at an incredible rate and something changed. Obviously they still take care of the lines but the emphasis of not just having one guy but multiple to attack teams was definitely a change.

And you better be able to ATTACK them with some type of advantage, Clemson used size but the game seem to have gone to SPEEEEED, you better be able to zooom to stress a defense, others also get mad when I mention track times but its not a coincidence after Gattis was around Ruggs 10.5 (4.25 forty), Waddle 10.6, Smith 10.6, Juedy 4.4 speeed, he seen how that track speed stress a defense and he said that was the next thing he looks for after football skills. Bama was down here snatching our top kids, now OSU seem to want to line them up, ugh..

I need to find that 247 article talking about this years ago
The problem is no stud wrs are going to want to play in this offense anfter watching it and I don’t blame them. However We do have SIX 4 Star WRs on this team currently and everyone is just acting like everyone of them is a lost cause. A lot of teams do much more with less than we have at wr. How about we coach up the six blue chippers we have on the roster. 1 or 2 of them should be able to consistently catch a football
 
Back
Top