articles
Comments (254)
I think that winning is very overrated in recruiting but end of the day it does matter when you’re splitting hairs
Looking back at the top 10 teams in recruiting since Mario got here there’s one team that really doesn’t belong and that’s us
I don’t want to say it’s that simple because it’s not, but kids are front runners and they’re growing up thinking of us as a joke of a program that was good before they were born
Sometimes tough to out-recruit that when you are still struggling to win meaningful games
So on one hand I agree we’ve done far better in recruiting than we probably should have, but still a long ways to go
You make a good point about us often being part of a relatively small group that by many other metrics we shouldn’t be. And that has to be a credit to this staff and overall recent trajectory of the program. It’s a good (and necessary) sign.
Let’s hope we can keep things moving in the right direction. Because it’s harder to snag those elite guys, and because we’re still trying to scrap our way into that group that regularly gets them, our margin for error is pretty thin.
I also agree winning generally doesn’t seem to be a huge deal, especially these days, but we need every feather in our cap we can get. We really can’t afford a bad season while we’re trying to build this thing back up. Better take care of business this fall.
We get in a little vacuum here from time to time but knowing people at other programs they do look at us like we must be buying all of our recruits or Mario is just elite
We really have no business beating the Ohio State/UGAs of the world for players although people do acknowledge Miami would be a **** of a fun place for a kid to go to college
But even if that is true it’s important we don’t set the bar too low as fans and settle for things just because they should/could be worse
Feels like this is the first time where the program is really interested in investing and going all in so we can’t waste it
Good point. Not sure how that’s gonna shake out over time, but we’re clearly fighting with one arm tied behind our back on the conference front right now.
Coach O's head always looks shopped in pictures!
I know you're (probably?) busting balls, but getting that accurate reflection in the sun glasses would be a helluva photo-shop.
Last edited:
Ya that's what I mean… How many WR does he think we are supposed to carry?
Don't get me wrong, but 4 sounds better than 3. And I expect to lose at least 1 to portal… But even then 3 in 24, 3 in 25, 3 in 26…If we lose one to portal that's 8, then you hit the portal for 1 or 2.
Oh let me guess WR4 on this situation is going to be Jeremiah Smith portalling in!? Lol.
Taking 3 HS WRs is literally dumb as **** planning, plain and simple.
We have literally 6 guys we should be putting any weight at all on them returning - Trader, Carr, Chance, Toney, Moore, Upshaw. And Chance has never stayed healthy more than a week...
Imagine not taking a 4th WR out of HS because you have Ray Ray entering his final yr of eligibility next yr lol. What are the actual odds he doesn't transfer out?
And to make it worse even if Ray Ray does return and wasn't completely beat out by Toney this season, you still only would have 10 WRs and still NEED another 2+ portal WRs. If we are moving to 105 scholarships there is no reason whatsoever we should ever have less than 12 WRs on this roster. Id prefer the strategy of loading up on HS assuming you eventually lose a couple every year or other year and only going for 1 portal Piece when necessary - and that being a top player not having to get guys like Anthony Johnson.
Ok, and I can't go into the future and get this classes post season rankings now can I?
The point is showing exactly how these services are currently rating these WRs right now. You can read into it whatever you like.
It's stupid.
I highly doubt that teams are going to bring in 40ish just to get up to 105
There will be 2-4 walk-ons awarded schollies, and we'll likely play in the low 90s-mid 90s for a year, a little higher next year, etc…JMO
Well I'd assume how it usually works is they watch some film, look at them perform during camps, and gather their Intel from Hs/college coaches and then assign a number.
Regardless @DMoney reported they view the class as weaker, and I think showing a top 10 or 20 average rating with substantially lower ratings proves his point. Tbh if their ratings are correct, but when he says that's how they view it he's stating a fact. Not some made up perception. And then he has our coaches with their evaluation agreeing. Now maybe our coaches are only grading it based on WRs we have any even minute shot at, and those guys as a whole aren't viewed as highly? Idk.
Excepts even at 85 scholarships at least 10 WRs is still entirely reasonable lol. NFL teams carry 6 WRs usually with a 53 man roster. That would translate to 10 WRs. And with even 95 scholarships 11 is the number. And they don't have players who can portal out literally anytime they want... So again only going into next season with likely 4 WRs you actually expect any production from next yr returning - Trader, Carr, Toney, Moore... And you only plan on signing 3? That is straight dumb.
Yes I agree
We are set to have 9…I'd say we lose 1 to the portal, so add 2 from the portal next year
And I agree with you I think 4 is a better number than 3, no doubt. And I would welcome as many as we can get. BUT…To go ape**** because we aren't adding 6-7 like you said is a bit of an overreaction. 3 + 1-2 portal isn't the end of the world.
Please stop crying.
Who said we would "not" take a 4th HS WR "because we have Ray Ray entering his final year of eligibility next year"? Seriously, who said that?
I'd also point out that you are ignoring the Portal. We just took 3 Portal WRs in the last 6 months. Why can't we do that again next year if we need to do so?
And why do you think a FOURTH high school wide receiver is our make-or-break player? Particularly with all the snaps that JoJo and Ny and Chance got last year.
I get it, you don't know the plan, you don't know what we might do. So settle down, sport, and be patient.
You can't put 12 WRs on the field at the same time. Stop acting like some hypothetical 4th high school wide receiver recruit is going to transform the team in his first year.
No clue what we are doing at receiver and the last bank sounded bad too. We were banking on a legacy and a five star from Mississippi. And then Lopez. Not to mention Lopez and Russell both want to play hoops and what coach Lucas supposed to do? Keep tossing charity to Kevin beard? Get outta here. It sucks hating on a former player but we destroyed rumph so here we go again. And rumph wasn’t recruiting with the top offense in the country in his holster
No the 4th wr isn’t going to be what makes us a national champion or not. But imagine using our current portal wr class as the proof that that strategy works lol. What if Chance and Ray Ray portal put? What if Carr does given he literally already entered his name in portal before? What if one of the guys in the 25 class left cause they felt they got beat out? That is why it would be dumb as **** planning to PLAN to only take 3 HS WRs. We need to take 4 absolute bare minimum, but 5 would be much better.
Not planning for attrition when we are moving to 105 scholarships would be brain dead, and just put us in this same position next yr or year after where we NEED to get 3 portal WRs and 1 or 2 aren’t the quality we want
Don't. you think the staff has a better pulse on the likelihood of this than you and will also hit portal harder if these things happen?
No. Because they literally failed at it last year. How can anyone look at our WR room and think 3 HS WRs is enough. You’d have to be dumb and give absolutely zero thought to any of the guys with remaining eligibility portalling out. Same thing at RB. We needed 2. Then what was the situation? Puts you in a box where you MUST land in portal and when you miss your ****ed
No they didn't…They added 3 from the portal
And Imagine you calling someone dumb…That would be almost as bad as you accusing them of being overly dramatic.
And again I don't think anyone is disagreeing with you that they we'd like more than 3 and I'm sure the staff wouldn't turn down a talented 4th. The point being as long as they hit portal and go into next season with somewhere around 9-10, it's not as dire as you are making it out to be.
