People still read rivals?
Anyways, are you going to post any of use or help for a talented kid or did you think it’ll be cute to try and start a fight?
Btw if rivals actually had a grade then that composite box under player rating would have a star grade because FYI it’s used to measure every grade by a recruiting site to make it one and it starts when AT LEAST one site gives a player a ranking. Sooooooo no actually Rivals doesn’t have a grade.
As to your first reply, my response was based on incorrectly viewing the attachment to your initial post above as being from Rivals.
So, when I used language such as "at the time of this posting" and "maybe they read your post and got cracking" it was in a positive context and based on what I thought was your "Rivals" attachment not having any stars [3] or numerical rating [5.7], and Rivals subsequently providing this information.
It wasn't an attempt to take a shot at you,, but I could see where you might think so.
I have since seen that what you attached was actually from 247 whereas what I attached was from Rivals, so my comments above actually don't apply.
As to your second reply and as I understand it, you view a "star grade' as a number and are saying that because there are no numbers on Rivals for this player above the "natl," "pos" or "st" abbreviations (interesting how those numbers are generated) this kid does not have a "grade."
I see that Borrregales, Rodriguez, Curtis, Haye, McLaughlin, and Burns similarly do not have any numbers above those abbreviations or "grades" as you would view it on the Rivals website.
Irrespective of whether its characterized as a grade, star grade, rating, ranking, or something else, and although no website is the be-all end-all gospel, Rivals listing this kid as a 3 star with a 5.5 rating and Rivals listing varying number of stars and numerical ratings (and other information) for our commitments certainly provides some indicia as to this kid's and our above commitments talent, ability, etc.
247sports.com
