ThomasM
Retired from college football
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 17,552
It means something if you beat a team way worse than someone else. For example, if Miami loses a tight game to someone and finishes with the same record as Alabama, anyone with any common sense would look at the common opponent, FSU, and say, "Alabama got whooped by FSU, while Miami rolled them."Again, I call it the "look test", you call it the "transitive property", whatever you want to call it, it's all we have as there are too many teams, too few games, and non-uniformity in scheduling so it can't be determined on the field unfortunately. It's why there is a playoff committee, why there are multiple votes for rankings, etc.
And frankly, looking at your ranking, wins and losses must not work in college football either, but like I said, great job being the contrarian and making an interesting convo.
![]()
I look at Texas this way. They are not that good. Why did Ohio State, if they are the best team in the country, struggle with them so badly? Comparisons are ALL we have in college football. I see what Florida did to Texas and ask, "Why couldn't Ohio State do that?" Then I ask myself, "How did Miami hold UF to 141 total yards, and no one else can?" We compare results, period. We have to. How else can we come to a logical conclusion?