For those who didn't like that comparison, here's the stats after their first 2 years:
Yearby - 291 carries, 1,511 yards, 5.2 ypc, 7 TD's
Cooper - 296 carries, 1,523 yards, 5.1 ypc, 8 TD's
Looks like a pretty good comparison to me.
For those who didn't like that comparison, here's the stats after their first 2 years:
Yearby - 291 carries, 1,511 yards, 5.2 ypc, 7 TD's
Cooper - 296 carries, 1,523 yards, 5.1 ypc, 8 TD's
Looks like a pretty good comparison to me.
For those who didn't like that comparison, here's the stats after their first 2 years:
Yearby - 291 carries, 1,511 yards, 5.2 ypc, 7 TD's
Cooper - 296 carries, 1,523 yards, 5.1 ypc, 8 TD's
Looks like a pretty good comparison to me.
For those who didn't like that comparison, here's the stats after their first 2 years:
Yearby - 291 carries, 1,511 yards, 5.2 ypc, 7 TD's
Cooper - 296 carries, 1,523 yards, 5.1 ypc, 8 TD's
Looks like a pretty good comparison to me.
For those who didn't like that comparison, here's the stats after their first 2 years:
Yearby - 291 carries, 1,511 yards, 5.2 ypc, 7 TD's
Cooper - 296 carries, 1,523 yards, 5.1 ypc, 8 TD's
Looks like a pretty good comparison to me.
You need to consider the suck aXX offensive line Yearby had to run behind.
For those who didn't like that comparison, here's the stats after their first 2 years:
Yearby - 291 carries, 1,511 yards, 5.2 ypc, 7 TD's
Cooper - 296 carries, 1,523 yards, 5.1 ypc, 8 TD's
Looks like a pretty good comparison to me.
Yea he's definitely not an elite Miami back. Thank James Coley. Bc of him, we "stole" Yearby from FSU, and lost out on the two significantly better backs of that season.
**** why all the hate for yearby?
he ran for a thousand yards this season on mainly stupid *** shotgun handoffs
For those who didn't like that comparison, here's the stats after their first 2 years:
Yearby - 291 carries, 1,511 yards, 5.2 ypc, 7 TD's
Cooper - 296 carries, 1,523 yards, 5.1 ypc, 8 TD's
Looks like a pretty good comparison to me.
Not even close... Coop was a home run threat when he touched the ball. Yd-by-yd is not.