forums

Xavier Lucas

Advertisement
Tempest said:
Led with his shoulder too. What a stupid penalty/rule. I was actually sure they’d overturn it after review. The head to head hit on Toney was significantly more violent (though reversing it was right).
Click to expand...
Surprised they didn't call targeting on the hit on Lofton tbh.
 
Glow said:
Can we appeal this or something
Click to expand...

I don’t know but I think you have to look at all options. Bring in some lawyers and big money and see if they will make a change for this one game. It’s only right by the sport and the kid.

It’s a dumbass rule anyways. Give the Newley but no one should be kicked out of the game. Who th **** approved that garbage
 
Advertisement
Handsome Squidbum said:
Gemini

“Yes, a college football team can appeal a targeting ejection, but only if the foul occurred in the second half of the game.
The NCAA updated its rules in 2022 to address the "carryover" penalty, where a player ejected in the second half of a game must also sit out the first half of the next game.
How the Appeal Process Works
* The "Carryover" Only: You cannot appeal the ejection from the game in which the hit occurred. The appeal is specifically to waive the suspension for the first half of the next game.
* Initiated by the Conference: The team’s conference must submit a request to the NCAA National Coordinator of Officials.
* The Standard: The National Coordinator reviews the video. The suspension is only overturned if it is "clearly obvious" that the player should not have been penalized for targeting.
* First Half Ejections: If a player is ejected in the first half, there is no post-game appeal process because there is no carryover suspension. The in-game booth review is considered the final word for those cases.
Summary Table: Targeting Penalties
| Time of Foul | Immediate Penalty | Carryover Penalty
Yes, a college football team can appeal a targeting ejection, but only if the foul occurred in the second half of the game.
The NCAA updated its rules in 2022 to address the "carryover" penalty, where a player ejected in the second half of a game must also sit out the first half of the next game.
How the Appeal Process Works
* The "Carryover" Only: You cannot appeal the ejection from the game in which the hit occurred. The appeal is specifically to waive the suspension for the first half of the next game.
* Initiated by the Conference: The team’s conference must submit a request to the NCAA National Coordinator of Officials.
* The Standard: The National Coordinator reviews the video. The suspension is only overturned if it is "clearly obvious" that the player should not have been penalized for targeting.
* First Half Ejections: If a player is ejected in the first half, there is no post-game appeal process because there is no carryover suspension. The in-game booth review is considered the final word for those cases.
Click to expand...
So its up to the ACC to initiate it? We're ****ed lol
 
Handsome Squidbum said:
Gemini

“Yes, a college football team can appeal a targeting ejection, but only if the foul occurred in the second half of the game.
The NCAA updated its rules in 2022 to address the "carryover" penalty, where a player ejected in the second half of a game must also sit out the first half of the next game.
How the Appeal Process Works
* The "Carryover" Only: You cannot appeal the ejection from the game in which the hit occurred. The appeal is specifically to waive the suspension for the first half of the next game.
* Initiated by the Conference: The team’s conference must submit a request to the NCAA National Coordinator of Officials.
* The Standard: The National Coordinator reviews the video. The suspension is only overturned if it is "clearly obvious" that the player should not have been penalized for targeting.
* First Half Ejections: If a player is ejected in the first half, there is no post-game appeal process because there is no carryover suspension. The in-game booth review is considered the final word for those cases.
Summary Table: Targeting Penalties
| Time of Foul | Immediate Penalty | Carryover Penalty
Yes, a college football team can appeal a targeting ejection, but only if the foul occurred in the second half of the game.
The NCAA updated its rules in 2022 to address the "carryover" penalty, where a player ejected in the second half of a game must also sit out the first half of the next game.
How the Appeal Process Works
* The "Carryover" Only: You cannot appeal the ejection from the game in which the hit occurred. The appeal is specifically to waive the suspension for the first half of the next game.
* Initiated by the Conference: The team’s conference must submit a request to the NCAA National Coordinator of Officials.
* The Standard: The National Coordinator reviews the video. The suspension is only overturned if it is "clearly obvious" that the player should not have been penalized for targeting.
* First Half Ejections: If a player is ejected in the first half, there is no post-game appeal process because there is no carryover suspension. The in-game booth review is considered the final word for those cases.
Click to expand...
So Miami fycked.
 
Advertisement
xbobdog said:
I am good with the targeting rules. it helps both players in the long run. I just want it evenly applied. *I don't believe either of those hits should have been targeting. The first because it was just a collision that happened to involve the heads and second because he got low and hit with his shoulder to the body. just my opinion.
Click to expand...
*Then you aren’t good with the targeting rules.

There needs to be some common sense adjustments to the rule. I think 🏀 Flagrant I & II is easiest to adapt. (Or ⚽️ yellow/red cards) Allow intent to be part of it.

Two yellow penalties, you’re toast. See you next week. Red card (intent)… Bye see you in 2 weeks dirt bag ✌🏽
 
Back
Top