Xavier Lucas

[simplycanes]

They need an appeal process.

 

[3rd-43]

I said out loud when there’s was reversed that I was good with it as long as the same courtesy was shown to us cause we are beyond more physical. **** I regret that statement

 

[caneingville]

I clarified it for you.

Good call!

 

[PRcane787]

 

[HurricanesR1]

Bruh WTF was Xavier Lucas supposed to do there? The people responsible for confirming that flag deserve 25 years in a cell with Diddy and NO baby oil.

 

[OldhamA]

Led with his shoulder too. What a stupid penalty/rule. I was actually sure they’d overturn it after review. The head to head hit on Toney was significantly more violent (though reversing it was right).

Surprised they didn't call targeting on the hit on Lofton tbh.

 

[Hufftwoseven]

Such a terrible call. A lot of bad calls and we persevered

 

[BeastMode]

Can we appeal this or something

I don’t know but I think you have to look at all options. Bring in some lawyers and big money and see if they will make a change for this one game. It’s only right by the sport and the kid.

It’s a dumbass rule anyways. Give the Newley but no one should be kicked out of the game. Who th **** approved that garbage

 

[goblin deez nuts]

Can we appeal this or something

Yes

 

[Mr. Dynasty1]

Hilarious

 

[Hoyacane1620]

 

[CreativeCane]

This tweet by this officiating expert should absolutely be used in the appeal.

 

[Zombie-Cane]

Yes. Put him in Dylan Days jersey for first half. Was a ridiculous call

How do you call targeting when the guy goes low to make the tackle but the receiver trips over his own feet and falls basically into where Lucas was hitting low?!?!

 

[Zombie-Cane]

I don’t agree with the call, but shoulder is included in the rule.

It is indeed, so then my question is, where was the targeting on the hit that took Lofton out?!?!

 

[mosthated305]

Gemini

“Yes, a college football team can appeal a targeting ejection, but only if the foul occurred in the second half of the game.
The NCAA updated its rules in 2022 to address the "carryover" penalty, where a player ejected in the second half of a game must also sit out the first half of the next game.
How the Appeal Process Works
* The "Carryover" Only: You cannot appeal the ejection from the game in which the hit occurred. The appeal is specifically to waive the suspension for the first half of the next game.
* Initiated by the Conference: The team’s conference must submit a request to the NCAA National Coordinator of Officials.
* The Standard: The National Coordinator reviews the video. The suspension is only overturned if it is "clearly obvious" that the player should not have been penalized for targeting.
* First Half Ejections: If a player is ejected in the first half, there is no post-game appeal process because there is no carryover suspension. The in-game booth review is considered the final word for those cases.
Summary Table: Targeting Penalties
| Time of Foul | Immediate Penalty | Carryover Penalty
Yes, a college football team can appeal a targeting ejection, but only if the foul occurred in the second half of the game.
The NCAA updated its rules in 2022 to address the "carryover" penalty, where a player ejected in the second half of a game must also sit out the first half of the next game.
How the Appeal Process Works
* The "Carryover" Only: You cannot appeal the ejection from the game in which the hit occurred. The appeal is specifically to waive the suspension for the first half of the next game.
* Initiated by the Conference: The team’s conference must submit a request to the NCAA National Coordinator of Officials.
* The Standard: The National Coordinator reviews the video. The suspension is only overturned if it is "clearly obvious" that the player should not have been penalized for targeting.
* First Half Ejections: If a player is ejected in the first half, there is no post-game appeal process because there is no carryover suspension. The in-game booth review is considered the final word for those cases.

So its up to the ACC to initiate it? We're ****ed lol

 

[Empirical Cane]

Gemini

“Yes, a college football team can appeal a targeting ejection, but only if the foul occurred in the second half of the game.
The NCAA updated its rules in 2022 to address the "carryover" penalty, where a player ejected in the second half of a game must also sit out the first half of the next game.
How the Appeal Process Works
* The "Carryover" Only: You cannot appeal the ejection from the game in which the hit occurred. The appeal is specifically to waive the suspension for the first half of the next game.
* Initiated by the Conference: The team’s conference must submit a request to the NCAA National Coordinator of Officials.
* The Standard: The National Coordinator reviews the video. The suspension is only overturned if it is "clearly obvious" that the player should not have been penalized for targeting.
* First Half Ejections: If a player is ejected in the first half, there is no post-game appeal process because there is no carryover suspension. The in-game booth review is considered the final word for those cases.
Summary Table: Targeting Penalties
| Time of Foul | Immediate Penalty | Carryover Penalty
Yes, a college football team can appeal a targeting ejection, but only if the foul occurred in the second half of the game.
The NCAA updated its rules in 2022 to address the "carryover" penalty, where a player ejected in the second half of a game must also sit out the first half of the next game.
How the Appeal Process Works
* The "Carryover" Only: You cannot appeal the ejection from the game in which the hit occurred. The appeal is specifically to waive the suspension for the first half of the next game.
* Initiated by the Conference: The team’s conference must submit a request to the NCAA National Coordinator of Officials.
* The Standard: The National Coordinator reviews the video. The suspension is only overturned if it is "clearly obvious" that the player should not have been penalized for targeting.
* First Half Ejections: If a player is ejected in the first half, there is no post-game appeal process because there is no carryover suspension. The in-game booth review is considered the final word for those cases.

So Miami fycked.

 

[Distructobot3000]

Wild that they upheld this targeting after pulling back the one where Toney got hit.

Ole Miss player literally knocked himself woozy after hitting Toney helmet to helmet and then had to go to the medical tent to check for a concussion.

 

[johnumcanes]

I wonder if somehow we can appeal the call. We have a little over a week.

 

[L A M P]

I am good with the targeting rules. it helps both players in the long run. I just want it evenly applied. *I don't believe either of those hits should have been targeting. The first because it was just a collision that happened to involve the heads and second because he got low and hit with his shoulder to the body. just my opinion.

*Then you aren’t good with the targeting rules.

There needs to be some common sense adjustments to the rule. I think Flagrant I & II is easiest to adapt. (Or ️ yellow/red cards) Allow intent to be part of it.

Two yellow penalties, you’re toast. See you next week. Red card (intent)… Bye see you in 2 weeks dirt bag

 

[CityboyCanes4life82]

Whatever happened to OJ?

My friend at the game said that he was throwing up. I didn’t realize that a lot of players had the flu until after the game so I don’t think he was re-injured.