Da_Lucky_One
All ACC
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2018
- Messages
- 7,093
The Women's team is built to make another deep run in the Tournament.
Winning the ACC is not unrealistic but it will have its challenges.
ND and Duke are slightly better.
You would think or hope that the results this year translates to some high school recruiting push......lets see.Need to bring in at least 1 three point shooter and maybe 2. They lost 7 players and as far as Ive seen they replaced 2 so far. Anybody know if they have any high school recruits signed ? I didn’t see anyone in the top 100 signed with Miami.
Absolutely, the twins only brought out the perverts.Now that the Cavender twins are gone, is it still appropriate to be starting threads about chick hoops???
Absolutely, the twins only brought out the perverts.
This proves I care about the women's basketball program and that I am not in that group.
Just saying.
I dont share your opinion that the Cavinder twins only brought out the perverts. They brought legitimate attention to the women's hoops program. I consider myself among that crowd. I watched two full women's basketball games this season because of Haley Cavinder. The first time I've ever watched a chick hoops game in my life.
I have a theory that women's sports are only marketable to the wider male audience if the women are attractive. There's a reason why the WNBA has no marketability. College chick hoops isnt far behind. The Cavinder gals made UM chick hoops watchable. Now that they're gone, Im not so sure it is. This does not make anyone a pervert. Its just a component of natural law.
To be fair, Hylton got nothing on the Cavender twins! She good looking AF!I dont share your opinion that the Cavinder twins only brought out the perverts. They brought legitimate attention to the women's hoops program. I consider myself among that crowd. I watched two full women's basketball games this season because of Haley Cavinder. The first time I've ever watched a chick hoops game in my life.
I have a theory that women's sports are only marketable to the wider male audience if the women are attractive. There's a reason why the WNBA has no marketability. College chick hoops isnt far behind. The Cavinder gals made UM chick hoops watchable. Now that they're gone, Im not so sure it is. This does not make anyone a pervert. Its just a component of natural law.
I dont share your opinion that the Cavinder twins only brought out the perverts. They brought legitimate attention to the women's hoops program. I consider myself among that crowd. I watched two full women's basketball games this season because of Haley Cavinder. The first time I've ever watched a chick hoops game in my life.
I have a theory that women's sports are only marketable to the wider male audience if the women are attractive. There's a reason why the WNBA has no marketability. College chick hoops isnt far behind. The Cavinder gals made UM chick hoops watchable. Now that they're gone, Im not so sure it is. This does not make anyone a pervert. Its just a component of natural law.
To be fair, Hylton got nothing on the Cavender twins! She good looking AF!
100% agree with you tho, woman’s skills in the 4 big North American sports is so far from the men, it’s unwatchable. Woman’s basketball is legit mid HS level. If you watch the highlights of the N1 pick of the WNBA from South Carolina, it’s just a bunch of lay ups. A kid with theses highlights don’t even get offered a D1 scholly…
The best woman’s hockey teams in the world get wrecked by 16 years old male.
I came for the Cavinders (not in a perv way). I stayed for Destiny Harden and the rest of the program.
I can't say I will watch too often, but consider me a bandwagon Miami women's hoop fan now. Which is a big upgrade from crickets.