Which users generate the most views? -answers inside

[OBLIVION]

At this very moment @Andrew is checking his threads status

 

[reg]

Is it possible to get the data regarding the number of reactions per post?

 

[Empirical Cane]

I’m trying to re-brand BNN

View attachment 112381

I think you need to go with something like this...

"Bring'n the rough and tough meat...Now sit your soy *** down..."

Something like that...

Maybe run a focus group.

 

[RVACane]

Is it possible to get the data regarding the number of reactions per post?

Basically what some raised. There are sub 10,000 post posters with high reaction percentages. It gets harder as the post count climbs. LCE is an outlier. I think Brock is a little more than double - reaction score to post count.

 

[brock]

Here is total reactions
View attachment 112368

 

[reg]

Basically what some raised. There are sub 10,000 post posters with high reaction percentages. It gets harder as the post count climbs. LCE is an outlier. I think Brock is a little more than double - reaction score to post count.

So, its not as simple as taking the number of reactions and dividing that number by the number of post?

For instance, your reaction score is 39,025 and you've posted 18,193 which yields an average of 2.14 reactions for every post. Is that not how it works?

 

[jackbenimble71]

How tf did Brock edge him out though?

when he is away from his mommas basement and has got to work to make that latte, he has bots that auto click on his threads

 

[RVACane]

So, its not as simple as taking the number of reactions and dividing that number by the number of post?

It is

 

[jackbenimble71]

The 3 at the top are a legit reflection of top posters, each in their own way.

cause they have been here for a long time

 

[reg]

It is

Thanks. I would love to see the top 20 for that list. I would imagine people like @Roman Marciante would be pretty high.

FYI: I edited my previous post but it looks like you responded before it saved.

 

[brock]

just a suggestion but It would be great if y’all brought back the reaction meter under the name of each poster on here

 

[JD08]

Where is @Lance Roffers? He's the stats guy.

 

[duke4heisman]

just a suggestion but It would be great if y’all brought back the reaction meter under the name of each poster on here

This. @Andrew made a thread and a majority voted for it. He brought it back and then the next time he updated the site, it was gone. What gives, millennials crying about cyber bullying?

 

[BeastMode]

In some cases, would the number of threads started inflate the number of views?

for sure.

 

[OBLIVION]

View attachment 112385

No Brambo. You have to come harder into threads.

 

[RVACane]

cause they have been here for a long time

Don’t be hatin

 

[423Hurricane]

So, its not as simple as taking the number of reactions and dividing that number by the number of post?

For instance, your reaction score is 39,025 and you've posted 18,193 which yields an average of 2.14 reactions for every post. Is that not how it works?

I'm a numbers geek. Always been fascinated with crunching numbers. Not a bean counter though. There could be a plethora of stats that could be derived from Andrews data bank.

I think this average is a cool one. Shows the impact a certain poster has on the board regardless of longevity.

 

[OBLIVION]

I'm a numbers geek. Always been fascinated with crunching numbers. Not a bean counter though. There could be a plethora of stats that could be derived from Andrews data bank.

I think this average is a cool one. Shows the impact a certain poster has on the board regardless of longevity.

Yeah, like how the rookie @D RevLee is about to be the all time active ignore leader.

 

[RVACane]

Thanks. I would love to see the top 20 for that list. I would imagine people like @Roman Marciante would be pretty high.

FYI: I edited my previous post but it looks like you responded before it saved.

As I was essentially saying, there’s a balance. It gets harder as your count climbs. LCE is an outlier and I think the clear number one when you factor post count and balance it with the reaction score. By a straight calculation, with less than 4,000 posts, you rank higher than LCE. I think you’re a great poster but the count has to factor into it because every additional post is a risk.There needs to be a weighted average of things.

 

[OBLIVION]

This. @Andrew made a thread and a majority voted for it. He brought it back and then the next time he updated the site, it was gone. What gives, millennials crying about cyber bullying?

We had to restrain members like @RVACane with pepper spray because he hunted down those that downvoted him.