- Joined
- Feb 27, 2018
- Messages
- 17,121
I have gone back and forth with this guy repeatedly about this. Situational defense and the fact that we have up a fourth quarter lead four times means nothing, because our stats over the course of an entire season against some basura opponents is more important. When you bring that up, the response is well the defense was tired. Then when you bring up the opponent’s TOP in the FIU game was 30:13, UNC had the ball for 24:37, GT had the ball for 32:24 and Duke has it for 26:41, they just say well whatever man the offense could have scored more. That is not untrue, but the offense sucking *** is not mutually exclusive to the defense being overrated and key in some losses.
You keep using the term situational football. How does that term fare when factoring these second half possessions by our historically bad offense in the Duke game as an example:
3 plays 5 yards :52 seconds
6 plays 13 yards 3:59
4 plays 4 yards 1:59
3 plays 5 yards 1:26
3 plays -3 yards 1:43
3 plays -2 yards 1:26
3 plays 1 yard 1:06
6 plays 32 yards 2:23
5 plays 6 yards 1:12
Is that a defense that's coughing up a lead late or a defense thats being asked to play perfect football while gassed from being on the field literally the entire second half? This game is a microcosm of the typical game for us offensively over the last two seasons.
It's not me saying the offense just needs to score more like some kind of simpleton. Its obvious situations where our offense put the defense in nearly impossible positions to win in a vast majority of our games.