My favorite part about Feuntes' play calling was having his backup QB run the ball into the defense on 3rd down with 27 seconds left when Pitt had no more timeouts.
My favorite part is he has put up 500+ yards in back to back games vs Power 5 opponents. Outside a game played in a monsoon, he's broke 400 every game.
Richt and Miami have yet to break 365 yards and is averaging 339 ypg. Even with the monsoon game VT is at 447 ypg
Cool. Brady Hoke was lights out in his first year, too. Now he's the DC for possibly the worst defensive team in America.
80 year old women were wondering why he had his QB actually running plays. But since he is infallible, we just don't understand his reasoning and logic.
Lmao the flawless logic continues. So Fuentes deserves to be questioned despite his RECENT success but Richt deserves to go unquestioned, why? I presume his track record? I guess not winning a conference title in 11 years, making it to two two conference titles in the 11 years since despite UT, Florida and South Carolina all being **** for the past 5 years, going 14-23 against ranked opponents, and 5-11 against his top rival, merit him infallibility in your brain dead eyes.
Jon Richt, what are you doing on a message board. Don't get too comfortable, your dad won't have a job for much longer...