No it doesn’t take 5-10 years to build a program. Sit your *** down.Our problem is we want to fire everyone that does not win a conference title or a Natty in 2-3 years. We are so short sighted it is not funny. It takes 5-10 years to build a program, yet we want to fire everyone after a bad loss. Some are warranted (DC), be cautious about this as it only decays the program. Boy, I can sure speak out of both sides of my mouth, eh? DC is the only change I would make right now.
There are levels to this tho, it takes 5/10 to build Clemson, OSU and Alabama, but it should be year one to build a program that doesn't lose to Duke, FIU and CMU in the same season. Diaz defense is in year 6 so there's no reason to be embarassed like last saturdayOur problem is we want to fire everyone that does not win a conference title or a Natty in 2-3 years. We are so short sighted it is not funny. It takes 5-10 years to build a program, yet we want to fire everyone after a bad loss. Some are warranted (DC), be cautious about this as it only decays the program. Boy, I can sure speak out of both sides of my mouth, eh? DC is the only change I would make right now.
Cmon dude. You know **** well “hasn’t won a title” isn’t on anyone’s list of reasons to fire manny.Our problem is we want to fire everyone that does not win a conference title or a Natty in 2-3 years. We are so short sighted it is not funny. It takes 5-10 years to build a program, yet we want to fire everyone after a bad loss. Some are warranted (DC), be cautious about this as it only decays the program. Boy, I can sure speak out of both sides of my mouth, eh? DC is the only change I would make right now.
I saw the talk about culture on the board - you think we can ever be a place like this?
How long did it take Clemson to build a program?No it doesn’t take 5-10 years to build a program. Sit your *** down.
Didn’t he have to share the DC role with Bob Stoops’ brother Mike at OU?Oklahoma got that boy jaded, years later still taking shots?
Only two reasons:
1) He is smart enough to know his role is destined as DC and not successful HC
2) See #1.
Kudos to him, far too many executives "succeed" at being surbordinates, but when they get their time in the seat, flame out miserably.
He likely enjoys the stability of being in the #2 slot and pays the qualitative and quantitative premium to stay in that lane.
Good for him.
Oklahoma got that boy jaded, years later still taking shots?
How closely does that align with pre- and post- Watson-Sunshine? I’d say having two generational QBs back-to-back had a little more to do with that record.Saw some stat today.
Pre-Venables, Dabo was was 29-19.
Post-Venables, Dabo has been 112-10 (something along those lines).