Usc fans on chip kelly....

[Cats3x]

If Kelly would come here Miami would be stupid to interview anyone else. He would be awesome at the U. Love Butch, but Kelly is the best coach on the market IMO.

 

[Dwinstitles]

If Kelly would come here Miami would be stupid to interview anyone else. He would be awesome at the U. Love Butch, but Kelly is the best coach on the market IMO.

Based off what oregon? They still have a mean o without him i wouldnt be so mad but imma wait and se dude i aint wearing butch shirts or whoever. Tbey gotta show me on the trail first on the field after, i trust butch the most best resume. Kelly roster management is fkin awful horrible talent evaluator chasing off shady and jackaon hes is weird as ***.

 

[Cane Dynasty]

who gives a **** what fans think. you think if it were up to our fans we would have hired a guy with a head coaching record of 28-29-1 before his tenure at um.. or a guy, whos head coaching record was 50-31 at schools like wyoming, idaho, and washington state???? ****, same fans who paid to fly banners for butch now have the biggest hardon for him lol smh

Can you actually prove this claim or are you just pulling **** out of your *** because you think it makes you sound smart?

 

[OBLIVION]

I don't see USC going with Kelly.

 

[kccanefan]

I would be happy with Kelly. Don't see it happening though.

 

[poncho0091]

Chip took over Oregon when it was already great.

Butch > Chip

It isn't really close if you look at their resumes.

We are gonna fck around and end up w Skrong as Head CoRch

Just fcking hire Butch and spend money on coordinators

Already great....I wouldn't say Oregon was great. You could say improving.

Oregon's last Pac-10 title was 2001. Chip won the Pac-10 in year #1 .
Oregon's last BCS appearance was 2001. Chip made the BCS his first season.
In the four years prior to his arrival, Oregon was averaging 9 wins per season. In Chips 4 years, Oregon averaged 11.5 wins per season.

Performance....

Chip (Oregon) v. Butch (Miami)

Conference Titles: 3 Each
Ten Win Seasons: Chip (4) and Butch (1)
Elite Bowls aka BCS Appearances: Chip (4) and Butch (1)
Elite Bowl wins aka BCS Wins: Chip (2) and Butch (1)
Top 10 Teams: Chip (3) and Butch (1)
Bowl Wins: Chip (2) and Butch (4)
Average Wins Per Season: Chip (11.5) and Butch (8.5)

Chip v. Butch NFL

Playoff Appearances: Chip (1) and Butch (1)
Average Wins/season: Chip (10) and Butch (6)
Win Percentage: Chip (60%) and Butch (40%)
Winning Seasons: Chip (2) and Butch (1)


Chip v. Butch Total College and General Tidbits

Averaged Wins Per Season: Chip (11.5) and Butch (7.9)
Bowl Record: Chip (2-2) and Butch (5-2)
Total BCS Games/Seasons: Chip (4/4) and Butch (1/10)
Top 10 Teams/Seasons: Chip (3/4) and Butch (1/10)
Age: Chip (51) and Butch (64)
HC Seasons: Chip (7) and Butch (14)
Last Season Coached: Chip (Current) and Butch (2010)

I'd take Chip Kelly over Butch in a heartbeat, but you aren't exactly comparing apples to apples here. The Eagles historically and recently have been a much better run organization than the Browns and Oregon was a solid team with records of 11-1 and 10-2 the two years before Kelly took over.

That being said, I am still taking Kelly if given the option.

You can never compare apples to apples. No 2 coaches have the same EXACT experience.

Yea, especially when one plays 1 less game per year than the other. Can we get off the 10 thing? 9 wins then was like 10 wins now. That's like trying to compare modern NFL team records to a team back in the day when they were only playing 14 games. But, but, but, today's team is better, because they were 14-2 instead of 12-2. It amazes me that people continuously choose to ignore this fact.

 

[UMFarArcher]

Chip took over Oregon when it was already great.

Butch > Chip

It isn't really close if you look at their resumes.

We are gonna fck around and end up w Skrong as Head CoRch

Just fcking hire Butch and spend money on coordinators

Already great....I wouldn't say Oregon was great. You could say improving.

Oregon's last Pac-10 title was 2001. Chip won the Pac-10 in year #1 .
Oregon's last BCS appearance was 2001. Chip made the BCS his first season.
In the four years prior to his arrival, Oregon was averaging 9 wins per season. In Chips 4 years, Oregon averaged 11.5 wins per season.

Performance....

Chip (Oregon) v. Butch (Miami)

Conference Titles: 3 Each
Ten Win Seasons: Chip (4) and Butch (1)
Elite Bowls aka BCS Appearances: Chip (4) and Butch (1)
Elite Bowl wins aka BCS Wins: Chip (2) and Butch (1)
Top 10 Teams: Chip (3) and Butch (1)
Bowl Wins: Chip (2) and Butch (4)
Average Wins Per Season: Chip (11.5) and Butch (8.5)

Chip v. Butch NFL

Playoff Appearances: Chip (1) and Butch (1)
Average Wins/season: Chip (10) and Butch (6)
Win Percentage: Chip (60%) and Butch (40%)
Winning Seasons: Chip (2) and Butch (1)


Chip v. Butch Total College and General Tidbits

Averaged Wins Per Season: Chip (11.5) and Butch (7.9)
Bowl Record: Chip (2-2) and Butch (5-2)
Total BCS Games/Seasons: Chip (4/4) and Butch (1/10)
Top 10 Teams/Seasons: Chip (3/4) and Butch (1/10)
Age: Chip (51) and Butch (64)
HC Seasons: Chip (7) and Butch (14)
Last Season Coached: Chip (Current) and Butch (2010)

I'd take Chip Kelly over Butch in a heartbeat, but you aren't exactly comparing apples to apples here. The Eagles historically and recently have been a much better run organization than the Browns and Oregon was a solid team with records of 11-1 and 10-2 the two years before Kelly took over.

That being said, I am still taking Kelly if given the option.

You can never compare apples to apples. No 2 coaches have the same EXACT experience.

Yea, especially when one plays 1 less game per year than the other. Can we get off the 10 thing? 9 wins then was like 10 wins now. That's like trying to compare modern NFL team records to a team back in the day when they were only playing 14 games. But, but, but, today's team is better, because they were 14-2 instead of 12-2. It amazes me that people continuously choose to ignore this fact.

They're just that dumb.

 

[Consigliere]

Chip took over Oregon when it was already great.

Butch > Chip

It isn't really close if you look at their resumes.

We are gonna fck around and end up w Skrong as Head CoRch

Just fcking hire Butch and spend money on coordinators

Already great....I wouldn't say Oregon was great. You could say improving.

Oregon's last Pac-10 title was 2001. Chip won the Pac-10 in year #1 .
Oregon's last BCS appearance was 2001. Chip made the BCS his first season.
In the four years prior to his arrival, Oregon was averaging 9 wins per season. In Chips 4 years, Oregon averaged 11.5 wins per season.

Performance....

Chip (Oregon) v. Butch (Miami)

Conference Titles: 3 Each
Ten Win Seasons: Chip (4) and Butch (1)
Elite Bowls aka BCS Appearances: Chip (4) and Butch (1)
Elite Bowl wins aka BCS Wins: Chip (2) and Butch (1)
Top 10 Teams: Chip (3) and Butch (1)
Bowl Wins: Chip (2) and Butch (4)
Average Wins Per Season: Chip (11.5) and Butch (8.5)

Chip v. Butch NFL

Playoff Appearances: Chip (1) and Butch (1)
Average Wins/season: Chip (10) and Butch (6)
Win Percentage: Chip (60%) and Butch (40%)
Winning Seasons: Chip (2) and Butch (1)


Chip v. Butch Total College and General Tidbits

Averaged Wins Per Season: Chip (11.5) and Butch (7.9)
Bowl Record: Chip (2-2) and Butch (5-2)
Total BCS Games/Seasons: Chip (4/4) and Butch (1/10)
Top 10 Teams/Seasons: Chip (3/4) and Butch (1/10)
Age: Chip (51) and Butch (64)
HC Seasons: Chip (7) and Butch (14)
Last Season Coached: Chip (Current) and Butch (2010)

I'd take Chip Kelly over Butch in a heartbeat, but you aren't exactly comparing apples to apples here. The Eagles historically and recently have been a much better run organization than the Browns and Oregon was a solid team with records of 11-1 and 10-2 the two years before Kelly took over.

That being said, I am still taking Kelly if given the option.

You can never compare apples to apples. No 2 coaches have the same EXACT experience.

Yea, especially when one plays 1 less game per year than the other. Can we get off the 10 thing? 9 wins then was like 10 wins now. That's like trying to compare modern NFL team records to a team back in the day when they were only playing 14 games. But, but, but, today's team is better, because they were 14-2 instead of 12-2. It amazes me that people continuously choose to ignore this fact.

How about winning percentage? Do the math and let me know who did better. You can throw out Butch's worst season too. Is that cool?

 

[arwinga]

I completely agree. I'm a huge Butch guy but you do whatever is necessary if you can get Kelly.

 

[deleted3746]

The BBB crew is still shook.

Want to know what's dumb? Losing to an inferior Washington team in 2000. Losing to unranked ECU twice with Miami athletes.

Want to know what's even dumber? Having a losing record to FSU, VT, ECU, UVA, NC ST., and GT.

 

[poncho0091]

Already great....I wouldn't say Oregon was great. You could say improving.

Oregon's last Pac-10 title was 2001. Chip won the Pac-10 in year #1 .
Oregon's last BCS appearance was 2001. Chip made the BCS his first season.
In the four years prior to his arrival, Oregon was averaging 9 wins per season. In Chips 4 years, Oregon averaged 11.5 wins per season.

Performance....

Chip (Oregon) v. Butch (Miami)

Conference Titles: 3 Each
Ten Win Seasons: Chip (4) and Butch (1)
Elite Bowls aka BCS Appearances: Chip (4) and Butch (1)
Elite Bowl wins aka BCS Wins: Chip (2) and Butch (1)
Top 10 Teams: Chip (3) and Butch (1)
Bowl Wins: Chip (2) and Butch (4)
Average Wins Per Season: Chip (11.5) and Butch (8.5)

Chip v. Butch NFL

Playoff Appearances: Chip (1) and Butch (1)
Average Wins/season: Chip (10) and Butch (6)
Win Percentage: Chip (60%) and Butch (40%)
Winning Seasons: Chip (2) and Butch (1)


Chip v. Butch Total College and General Tidbits

Averaged Wins Per Season: Chip (11.5) and Butch (7.9)
Bowl Record: Chip (2-2) and Butch (5-2)
Total BCS Games/Seasons: Chip (4/4) and Butch (1/10)
Top 10 Teams/Seasons: Chip (3/4) and Butch (1/10)
Age: Chip (51) and Butch (64)
HC Seasons: Chip (7) and Butch (14)
Last Season Coached: Chip (Current) and Butch (2010)

I'd take Chip Kelly over Butch in a heartbeat, but you aren't exactly comparing apples to apples here. The Eagles historically and recently have been a much better run organization than the Browns and Oregon was a solid team with records of 11-1 and 10-2 the two years before Kelly took over.

That being said, I am still taking Kelly if given the option.

You can never compare apples to apples. No 2 coaches have the same EXACT experience.

Yea, especially when one plays 1 less game per year than the other. Can we get off the 10 thing? 9 wins then was like 10 wins now. That's like trying to compare modern NFL team records to a team back in the day when they were only playing 14 games. But, but, but, today's team is better, because they were 14-2 instead of 12-2. It amazes me that people continuously choose to ignore this fact.

How about winning percentage? Do the math and let me know who did better. You can throw out Butch's worst season too. Is that cool?

Yes it is. While you're at it, why don't you count how many seasons Chip spent under sanctions or rebuilding dead programs.

Seriously though, the 10 win thing is so ignorant. I would be just fine with Chip, so the Butch factor is not even an issue here, but if you're going to make comparisons, they have to be even comparisons.

 

[poncho0091]

The BBB crew is still shook.

Want to know what's dumb? Losing to an inferior Washington team in 2000. Losing to unranked ECU twice with Miami athletes.

Want to know what's even dumber? Having a losing record to FSU, VT, ECU, UVA, NS ST., and GT.

The only one shook is you. That's why you feel the need to post 15 anti Butch threads per day with a new poll every couple hours. "Well, too many people wanted Butch in this poll. I'll just post another in a couple hours, because those guys will probably be busy for the next one".

 

[deleted3746]

The BBB crew is still shook.

Want to know what's dumb? Losing to an inferior Washington team in 2000. Losing to unranked ECU twice with Miami athletes.

Want to know what's even dumber? Having a losing record to FSU, VT, ECU, UVA, NS ST., and GT.

The only one shook is you. That's why you feel the need to post 15 anti Butch threads per day with a new poll every couple hours. "Well, too many people wanted Butch in this poll. I'll just post another in a couple hours, because those guys will probably be busy for the next one".

Stay shook.

#BringBackCorchButch

 

[Consigliere]

I'd take Chip Kelly over Butch in a heartbeat, but you aren't exactly comparing apples to apples here. The Eagles historically and recently have been a much better run organization than the Browns and Oregon was a solid team with records of 11-1 and 10-2 the two years before Kelly took over.

That being said, I am still taking Kelly if given the option.

You can never compare apples to apples. No 2 coaches have the same EXACT experience.

Yea, especially when one plays 1 less game per year than the other. Can we get off the 10 thing? 9 wins then was like 10 wins now. That's like trying to compare modern NFL team records to a team back in the day when they were only playing 14 games. But, but, but, today's team is better, because they were 14-2 instead of 12-2. It amazes me that people continuously choose to ignore this fact.

How about winning percentage? Do the math and let me know who did better. You can throw out Butch's worst season too. Is that cool?

Yes it is. While you're at it, why don't you count how many seasons Chip spent under sanctions or rebuilding dead programs.

Seriously though, the 10 win thing is so ignorant. I would be just fine with Chip, so the Butch factor is not even an issue here, but if you're going to make comparisons, they have to be even comparisons.

So how about the NFL part?

There will never be an even comparison because no two coaches have identical variables. You do what you want.

 

[The Iceman]

Look, he's light years ahead of the slop that we've put up since Butch Davis left but there are legitimate questions about Chip's ability to take it all the way. First, I recall his offense was shut down against stout defenses (Stanford under Harbaugh for example). Second, he hasn't shown the ability to put together a competent defense either in college or the pros. I would be all in for Chip but to pretend like he doesn't have a downside is silly as well.

Chip Kelly was 46-7 during his only stint as a head coach in college, at a program that is not in a fertile recruiting area.

Whatever downside he has is pretty minuscule.

Didn't he get in trouble with the NCAA before leaving Oregon.

 

[FullyERicht]

Look, he's light years ahead of the slop that we've put up since Butch Davis left but there are legitimate questions about Chip's ability to take it all the way. First, I recall his offense was shut down against stout defenses (Stanford under Harbaugh for example). Second, he hasn't shown the ability to put together a competent defense either in college or the pros. I would be all in for Chip but to pretend like he doesn't have a downside is silly as well.

Chip Kelly was 46-7 during his only stint as a head coach in college, at a program that is not in a fertile recruiting area.

Whatever downside he has is pretty minuscule.

Didn't he get in trouble with the NCAA before leaving Oregon. Would UM BOT take on that risk?

Another troll who is more interested in bringing in a coach he likes than Miami winning. Where do these people come from.

 

[omaha]

Has Butch ever mentioned who he would want as an OC and DC? Would take Butch if Herman and Kelly said get lost.

So right on the Roy Williams posts. The guy played his guys SOooo tight when it mattered at KU. Got a team at UNC with like 4 first round draft picks that he could only try and control them. Got another group of studs behind the UNC brand but has clearly shown he can not win without 3 first round draft picks on the floor at once. And he is not recruiting the first round guys. The word is out how he is controlling and will not let them play the way they need to during March Madness.

 

[poncho0091]

You can never compare apples to apples. No 2 coaches have the same EXACT experience.

Yea, especially when one plays 1 less game per year than the other. Can we get off the 10 thing? 9 wins then was like 10 wins now. That's like trying to compare modern NFL team records to a team back in the day when they were only playing 14 games. But, but, but, today's team is better, because they were 14-2 instead of 12-2. It amazes me that people continuously choose to ignore this fact.

How about winning percentage? Do the math and let me know who did better. You can throw out Butch's worst season too. Is that cool?

Yes it is. While you're at it, why don't you count how many seasons Chip spent under sanctions or rebuilding dead programs.

Seriously though, the 10 win thing is so ignorant. I would be just fine with Chip, so the Butch factor is not even an issue here, but if you're going to make comparisons, they have to be even comparisons.

So how about the NFL part?

There will never be an even comparison because no two coaches have identical variables. You do what you want.

Again, you're talking about an expansion team vs a well established eagles team that had stars.

You're absolutely right that you cannot make a proper comparison here, because their paths have been too different.

 

[CaneInTheBrain]

I once saw a study showing that Californians have, on average, among the lowest IQ's in the nation. I believe they showed the California average to be 5 points lower than the national average.

If I remember correctly, I also believe they are also some of the shortest people in the country.

 

[Cane Dynasty]

The BBB crew is still shook.

Want to know what's dumb? Losing to an inferior Washington team in 2000. Losing to unranked ECU twice with Miami athletes.

Want to know what's even dumber? Having a losing record to FSU, VT, ECU, UVA, NC ST., and GT.

It's just like when Durban Meyers lost to New Mexico. What a bum!!!

It's just like when Chip Kelly lost to not only Boise St., but also lost to a Stanford team led by prolific QB Josh Nunes in 2009, and then lost to a Todd Boeckman led OSUk team to finish off the season. What bum!!!

Anyone remember when Nick Saban lost to Utah? WHAT A ******* BUM!!!!!

I'm ******* shook!!!!! Shook I tell ya!!!