@Lance Roffers
What concerns you about our Miami Hurricanes?
Perhaps stated another way, where would you like to see improvement?
It was targeting. I saw it live and thought that will get called. We don't like the rule, we don't like the way it's called, but with the way the rule is written it was targeting.Would like your take on the target call on Day, on the punt. Also, FSU had a drive that started inside there 5, they were passing out of there end zone, and it looked like our defensive end had split the double team, and both of the o linemen held him. I thought it should have been hold + safety. Getting to the point, that no one understand what a hold is.
Excellent observations as always."...Offense sits 36th in Points/Drive (OPD) and 50th in Drive Success Rate, with Offensive Available Yards ranking 55th. This team has not been the dominant force on offense that last year's was and relies a bit too much on explosives. Teams scoring TD's outside of the red zone is volatile and Miami ranked near the top of those numbers..."
Explain the team going into lulls and letting 3 rivals back into games. That is a pattern.So many great plays, but so much to improve upon, too.
Am I crazy to believe we are going to be more dominant in ACC play now that Beck and his receivers have had camp and several games to work on their timing, and we start folding in the younger playmakers?
I know most Miami teams over the past 2 decades and even in the Butch years would play down to lesser competition. But this team is built different, made of winners who want to ball out. Helps that a lot of talented guys in the 2/3-deep are battling for more snaps.
FIFYThe "run game against better teams" topic is an entire thread onto itself.
We're not going to effectively "grind it out" (our coaches' words) for the remainder of the season. Yes, it worked against some solid teams early this season. No, it's not sustainable as a framework.
It's time for Mario, Mirabal, Dawson and Beck to tear off the next layer of our offense.
Explain the team going into lulls and letting 3 rivals back into games. That is a pattern.
Try harder. It is a legit question mark that numerous posters have brought up while watching, rewatching and reviewing the game. Throughout this thread, including from the OP, trying to grind it out against better defenses may not be sustainable.They stink. You should find something different to do with your time on Saturday. Is there a Painting With a Twist near you?

This x10000000The "run game against better teams" topic is an entire thread onto itself.
We're not going to effectively "grind it out" (our coaches' words) for the remainder of the season. Yes, it worked against some solid teams early this season. No, it's not sustainable as a framework.
It's time for Dawson and Beck to tear off the next layer of our offense.
Agreed.The "run game against better teams" topic is an entire thread onto itself.
We're not going to effectively "grind it out" (our coaches' words) for the remainder of the season. Yes, it worked against some solid teams early this season. No, it's not sustainable as a framework.
It's time for Dawson and Beck to tear off the next layer of our offense.
The "run game against better teams" topic is an entire thread onto itself.
We're not going to effectively "grind it out" (our coaches' words) for the remainder of the season. Yes, it worked against some solid teams early this season. No, it's not sustainable as a framework.
It's time for Dawson and Beck to tear off the next layer of our offense.
The "run game against better teams" topic is an entire thread onto itself.
We're not going to effectively "grind it out" (our coaches' words) for the remainder of the season. Yes, it worked against some solid teams early this season. No, it's not sustainable as a framework.
It's time for Dawson and Beck to tear off the next layer of our offense.
FIFY
Agreed.
It's time for Dawson and Beck to tear off the next layer of our offense.
I am old enough to remember when Mario went for it on two fourth downs at Florida State.
Agreed.
One of my favorite things about football is there is ALWAYS something fresh coming down the pike. Coaches do cool stuff every single week.What kind of run aspects, given our o-lines attributes/techniques would you realistically, add in if-any? I know you mentioned seeing more of what we've already implemented -- orbit/jet motions, duo and counter* (which off the top of my head has been decently succesful for us so far). I have noticed some pin and pull as well. But is there anywhere to go from here sprinkling in anything fresh?
The "run game against better teams" topic is an entire thread onto itself.
We're not going to effectively "grind it out" (our coaches' words) for the remainder of the season. Yes, it worked against some solid teams early this season. No, it's not sustainable as a framework.
It's time for Dawson and Beck to tear off the next layer of our offense.