UM (Michigan) in big trouble ?



This guy is toast lmao

It is one thing if you recruit a co-conspirator who snitches on you, it is another thing if you do not use basic easy precautions such as making all your transactions private. Could even go further and say no texting of pertinent details and keeping everything on the phone/in-person as well would make it easier to pull off
 
Advertisement
Two things I find interesting. It appears some other non BIG10 low level assistants with Michigan ties helped with that Michigan Manifesto. Lastly, his theory about low SAT/ACT scores paired with higher than expected GPA is a dang good one for my 2 cents.
 
Last edited:
This would not be as big of a deal without the COVID violation and the Matt Weiss investigation. Remember, both ASU coordinators were fired/resigned for a similar, albeit greater offense, COVID recruiting violation.
 
Advertisement
I guarantee NCAA will have absolutely no evidence of this guy doing anything wrong unless he confesses…then he’s an idiot. It’s not illegal to go buy tickets and attend other games. I seriously doubt the NCAA has recovered any videos he allegedly took stealing signals.

I’m sure the conspiracy is there; because where there is smoke, there is fire. however, NCAA will not have enough to prove anything.

With that being said, NCAA will still drop the hammer on Michigan.
 
I guarantee NCAA will have absolutely no evidence of this guy doing anything wrong unless he confesses…then he’s an idiot. It’s not illegal to go buy tickets and attend other games. I seriously doubt the NCAA has recovered any videos he allegedly took stealing signals.

I’m sure the conspiracy is there; because where there is smoke, there is fire. however, NCAA will not have enough to prove anything.

With that being said, NCAA will still drop the hammer on Michigan.


You can already see it with the legacy media and their narrative enforces on youtube. All they're doing is using circumstantial data points to paint a picture that Michigan is cheating. Not once have I seen anyone in media list a rule or bylaw stating that advanced scouting and/or sign stealing is not allowed.
 
You can already see it with the legacy media and their narrative enforces on youtube. All they're doing is using circumstantial data points to paint a picture that Michigan is cheating. Not once have I seen anyone in media list a rule or bylaw stating that advanced scouting and/or sign stealing is not allowed.
Yeah, but the NCAA makes it up as they go, so who knows what will happen. They're a vindictive group and I'm sure Jim has very few fans inside that organization.
 
Advertisement
Article 9, NFL constitution and bylaws:
View attachment 262879
View attachment 262880

President of Football Operations Ray Anderson memo in 2006:
"videotaping of any type, including but not limited to taping of an opponent's offensive or defensive signals, is prohibited on the sidelines, in the coaches' booth, in the locker room, or at any other locations accessible to club staff members during the game."
A September 6, 2006 memo from Ray Anderson, the NFL head of game operations, adds to this. However, the rules don’t support this belief. Anderson’s memo reads, “Videotaping of any type, including but not limited to taping of an opponent’s offensive or defensive signals, is prohibited on the sidelines, in the coaches’ booth, in the locker room, or at any other locations accessible to club staff members during the game.”

Unfortunately, the memo misquotes the rules, and Anderson can’t change the rules. Rule changes must be proposed to and voted on by the teams. The NFL cited the misquoted rules against the Patriots from pages A105-A106 of the league’s Policy Manual for Member Clubs Volume II: Game Operations 2007 edition.

Miscellaneous Rules and Regulations, Section A. reads, “No video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches’ booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game.”

The league also cited a portion of section D against the Patriots. Section D reads, “To ensure the protection of equipment and employees of the teams’ video departments, please follow the guidelines listed for the video shooting booths at your stadium.”

The league quoted the first guideline against the Patriots, “All video shooting locations must be enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead.” The rules never prohibit filming coaches. The sections used against the Patriots only concern camera locations.

 
Pretty sure teams had our signals last year too. I remember players saying the opposing teams knew what they were going to do.

I think it’s all fair play up until the videoing of the signaling…***** move but teams should be changing up signals bi weekly….we do that on the high school level.

So strange that it’s forbidden to scout in person. I would have never known that.
It’s been happening for years all over college football. It seems obvious at times. I remember a few years ago at the end of the game CMR confronted Holgerson. it looked like he was ****ed and rumor started circling after the game that it was because we thought they were stealing our signs.

Would not be surprised at all if there are people that actually do this that are not part of any team. In other words, there’s got to be several people who actually do this for a living that are not associated with any program per se, but actually do it for money.

and for anybody thinking that there’s no way that could actually happen, remember a few years ago when that dude was faking athletic profiles and having people take SATs in order for for a wealthy kid to get into an Ivy League school.
 
A September 6, 2006 memo from Ray Anderson, the NFL head of game operations, adds to this. However, the rules don’t support this belief. Anderson’s memo reads, “Videotaping of any type, including but not limited to taping of an opponent’s offensive or defensive signals, is prohibited on the sidelines, in the coaches’ booth, in the locker room, or at any other locations accessible to club staff members during the game.”

Unfortunately, the memo misquotes the rules, and Anderson can’t change the rules. Rule changes must be proposed to and voted on by the teams. The NFL cited the misquoted rules against the Patriots from pages A105-A106 of the league’s Policy Manual for Member Clubs Volume II: Game Operations 2007 edition.

Miscellaneous Rules and Regulations, Section A. reads, “No video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches’ booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game.”

The league also cited a portion of section D against the Patriots. Section D reads, “To ensure the protection of equipment and employees of the teams’ video departments, please follow the guidelines listed for the video shooting booths at your stadium.”

The league quoted the first guideline against the Patriots, “All video shooting locations must be enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead.” The rules never prohibit filming coaches. The sections used against the Patriots only concern camera locations.

Nope. Read the NFL Constitution and Bylaws. The policy manual you're speaking to lays out the policies for game-tape film, how to film, what film to use, when to send it to opponents/NFL films/officiating etc.

Do you really think they're referring rando dudes with camcorders on the sideline filming coaches? And that those tapes were being sent to opponents, officiating or NFL archives? Of course not, we know the Pats kept them.
 
Back
Top