I'm just excited to have a physical runner again. Can't remember the last time we had that.
Probably not since Mike james or Coop
Damian Berry was more physical than both of those guys.
I'm just excited to have a physical runner again. Can't remember the last time we had that.
Probably not since Mike james or Coop
Walton had 130yds from scrimmage vs Duke.Because people need a reason to justify that an injured, unproductive Walton was playing over a healthy, productive Homer.
I hate that Walton got hurt. It's a terrible, and unfair way for him to go out. Despite my criticisms of Walton, he always gave 100% and didn't deserve this.
But there has been a narrative since Spring practice to find ways to create a gap between Walton & Homer as a means of making Walton look better. The pass blocking argument is really a reach.
Go watch that fsu game and watch how walton picked up blitzes.
I'm not saying Walton wasn't great in pass protection. But there isn't a glaring difference in Walton's pass protection vs. Homer.
But there was a glaring difference in Walton's running vs. Homer.
So the justification for Walton's poor rushing performance and Richt's poor decision to keep playing him over Homer becomes to overstate Walton's value in pass protection.
Fück is you talking about? Walton was injured thats why he couldnt run. If homer was better than walton then richt would have started him. Homer is a solid back but dont act like he is elite all of a sudden. He wasn't even elite in high school.
Right - Walton was injured, and therefore has been ineffective the last 2 games.
Walton had 29-76 yds the last 2 games. Homer was 6-72 yds.
I'm not calling Homer elite - but I am saying he's been more effective than Walton the last 2 games, and the decision by Richt to keep riding Walton vs. giving Homer more carries was a poor decision.
And the justification for that poor decision is made by inflating Walton's pass blocking.
[video=youtube_share;EjfOTymu4os]https://youtu.be/EjfOTymu4os[/video]
Go to @ 3:12, the fans didn't make it up, it came directly from the Coaches mouth back in the Spring.
Does that mean it hasn't improved sense then, no, not at all, in fact it has drastically.
But there are several interviews dating back months ago in which both Coach Brown & Richt have noted that Homer needed to improve his pass blocking.
I still believe he'll be just fine at it, nothing to worry about. I'm only dispelling the idea that the fans made it up.
But do you think there's been a noticeable difference in Walton's pass blocking vs Homers this season?
If so, why hasn't it been mentioned until now?
Walton had 130yds from scrimmage vs Duke.Go watch that fsu game and watch how walton picked up blitzes.
I'm not saying Walton wasn't great in pass protection. But there isn't a glaring difference in Walton's pass protection vs. Homer.
But there was a glaring difference in Walton's running vs. Homer.
So the justification for Walton's poor rushing performance and Richt's poor decision to keep playing him over Homer becomes to overstate Walton's value in pass protection.
Fück is you talking about? Walton was injured thats why he couldnt run. If homer was better than walton then richt would have started him. Homer is a solid back but dont act like he is elite all of a sudden. He wasn't even elite in high school.
Right - Walton was injured, and therefore has been ineffective the last 2 games.
Walton had 29-76 yds the last 2 games. Homer was 6-72 yds.
I'm not calling Homer elite - but I am saying he's been more effective than Walton the last 2 games, and the decision by Richt to keep riding Walton vs. giving Homer more carries was a poor decision.
And the justification for that poor decision is made by inflating Walton's pass blocking.
He was only ineffective vs FSU.
Walton had 130yds from scrimmage vs Duke.I'm not saying Walton wasn't great in pass protection. But there isn't a glaring difference in Walton's pass protection vs. Homer.
But there was a glaring difference in Walton's running vs. Homer.
So the justification for Walton's poor rushing performance and Richt's poor decision to keep playing him over Homer becomes to overstate Walton's value in pass protection.
Fück is you talking about? Walton was injured thats why he couldnt run. If homer was better than walton then richt would have started him. Homer is a solid back but dont act like he is elite all of a sudden. He wasn't even elite in high school.
Right - Walton was injured, and therefore has been ineffective the last 2 games.
Walton had 29-76 yds the last 2 games. Homer was 6-72 yds.
I'm not calling Homer elite - but I am saying he's been more effective than Walton the last 2 games, and the decision by Richt to keep riding Walton vs. giving Homer more carries was a poor decision.
And the justification for that poor decision is made by inflating Walton's pass blocking.
He was only ineffective vs FSU.
Walton was 17-51 yds, 3.0 ypc vs. Duke. He was ineffective running the ball. I understand that Walton's injury played into that.
But are you agreeing with Richt's decision to break the carries 29 for Walton, 6 for Homer over the last 2 games?
I don't. I think most people don't, and are looking for a reason why, and bringing down Homer's pass blocking is the justification they're using.
Homer had carries of 10 & 14 yds on that last drive. Walton hasn't had a carry of 10 or more yards vs. FSU ever. I don't think we win if Homer isn't in there at the end.
https://www.canesinsight.com/thread...ctice-10-a/118805?highlight=Coach+Brown+Homer
For anybody wondering where the "narrative" came from, read this ^
I'm just excited to have a physical runner again. Can't remember the last time we had that.
Probably not since Mike james or Coop
Damian Berry was more physical than both of those guys.
James was a beast of a blocker and a complete back.I'm just excited to have a physical runner again. Can't remember the last time we had that.
Probably not since Mike james or Coop
He looked fine in pass protection against FSU, but as Pentagon said, it is an experience thing and Walton was terrific.
There is another consistant false narrative on these boards - that mentioning an area of concern or an attribute of an injured/former player means that you are knocking the current guy, and that simply isn't the case. Saying losing Walton, the best RB in the ACC, is not banging on Homer at all. It is saying we would rather the 1-2 punch.
You said it. Walton is a certified beast. He’s got all the skills and is a freak that doesn’t come around often. I’m just talking about hammering a guy and making sh&t up for no reason. This wasn’t about Walton. Sucks *** to lose him.
Agreed.
Honestly I am much more concerned about who replaces Homer on special teams. He has been the best Special Teams defender since Matt Bosher.
Because people need a reason to justify that an injured, unproductive Walton was playing over a healthy, productive Homer.
I hate that Walton got hurt. It's a terrible, and unfair way for him to go out. Despite my criticisms of Walton, he always gave 100% and didn't deserve this.
But there has been a narrative since Spring practice to find ways to create a gap between Walton & Homer as a means of making Walton look better. The pass blocking argument is really a reach.
Go watch that fsu game and watch how walton picked up blitzes.
I'm not saying Walton wasn't great in pass protection. But there isn't a glaring difference in Walton's pass protection vs. Homer.
But there was a glaring difference in Walton's running vs. Homer.
So the justification for Walton's poor rushing performance and Richt's poor decision to keep playing him over Homer becomes to overstate Walton's value in pass protection.
Fück is you talking about? Walton was injured thats why he couldnt run. If homer was better than walton then richt would have started him. Homer is a solid back but dont act like he is elite all of a sudden. He wasn't even elite in high school.
Right - Walton was injured, and therefore has been ineffective the last 2 games.
Walton had 29-76 yds the last 2 games. Homer was 6-72 yds.
I'm not calling Homer elite - but I am saying he's been more effective than Walton the last 2 games, and the decision by Richt to keep riding Walton vs. giving Homer more carries was a poor decision.
And the justification for that poor decision is made by inflating Walton's pass blocking.
What is the agenda with people saying Homer can't pass block? The season is over because he can't pass block? First of all, even if it was a weak link of his wouldn't you rather have a guy who can actually run the ball instead of a glorified pass blocker who plods into his blockers? Couple things on noticed on him. He runs ****ed. His legs are explosive. Without him running like a beast on that last drive he doesn't break those tackles and we don't get in position. That's all will. Second, his pass blocking was fine. FSU was attacking the ends and I noticed Walton struggling at times to catch up to the weakside as well. Third, Homer isn't afraid to get dirty. Go back and watch him on special teams. He is like a missile coming down field. Where people come up with these ideas is beyond me.